Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory最新文献_第5页

Collaboration of Firms With New Forms of Organizing: Extending the Relational View 新型组织形式下的企业合作:关系视角的扩展

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221131586

Deniz Philipp Kruse, Golo Rövekamp, Christiana Weber

{"title":"Collaboration of Firms With New Forms of Organizing: Extending the Relational View","authors":"Deniz Philipp Kruse, Golo Rövekamp, Christiana Weber","doi":"10.1177/26317877221131586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221131586","url":null,"abstract":"New forms of organizing (NFOs) such as crowds and communities are increasingly relevant as novel collaboration partners for organizations. Although the motivations and goals that prompt organizations to collaborate (the why) have not changed over time, the way they collaborate (the how) seems to have changed significantly. Surprisingly, research to theorize these new forms of collaboration is still sparse. This conceptual paper investigates the extent to which a widely established theoretical framework—the relational view—can capture this new and mostly undertheorized setting of firm–NFO collaborations. More precisely, we ask whether and how the relational view also applies to this new context of interaction between firms and NFOs. Adopting the relational view’s four determinants as a framework, we systematically analyse and disentangle firms’ collaborations with NFOs. We ground this investigation in two analytical dimensions, the degree of NFO self-organizing and the degree of firm-relatedness. They enable us to exemplify the variety of new forms of collaboration and, most important, to delineate clear differences between firm–NFO collaboration and traditional interorganizational collaboration. We stress the boundaries of the relational view, suggest expanding its scope to capture the variety of firm–NFO collaborations, and propose ways of doing so.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89734663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Expert Authority in Crisis: Making Authority Real Through Struggle 危机中的权威专家:通过斗争使权威成为现实

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221131587

Cara Reed, M. Reed

{"title":"Expert Authority in Crisis: Making Authority Real Through Struggle","authors":"Cara Reed, M. Reed","doi":"10.1177/26317877221131587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221131587","url":null,"abstract":"There is an emerging consensus both within the social scientific research community and more widely in the public domain that expert authority is “in trouble.” However, there is much greater disagreement over the scope and scale of this trouble and what it might mean for the nature, status, and significance of expert authority in the 21st century. This paper identifies and assesses three different narratives concerning the crisis in expert authority. These constitute the delegitimation narrative, the demystification narrative, and the decomposition narrative. They can be seen as responses to the breakdown in the implicit social contract between experts, publics, and states under the extreme and continuous pressures exerted on expert authority by disjunctive change. We evaluate these various interpretations of the crisis in expert authority, particularly in terms of what they suggest about the future potency and stability of the concept of expert authority. In this process of evaluation, we also highlight the emergence of reflexive expert authority and its implications for organizational governance as potential outcomes of this ongoing crisis in the legitimacy and status of expert workers. Consequently, the paper provides a general analytical framework for understanding the emergent narratives around expert authority in democracies and highlights how all three narratives point to serious problems in sustaining this authority in the face of destabilizing change. Furthermore, in developing the notion of reflexive expert authority, we contend that theorization of expert authority needs to privilege the deeper dynamics of trust and control at the core of its analytical focus within organization theory.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87044158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Temporal Narrative View of Sensemaking 意义建构的时间叙事观

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221131585

T. Hernes, David Obstfeld

引用次数: 3

‘Un-responsible’ Organization: How More Organization Produces Less Responsibility “不负责任”的组织:组织越多责任越少

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221131582

Nils Brunsson, Ingrid Gustafsson Nordin, Kristina Tamm Hallström

引用次数: 4

Impactful Theory: Pathways to Mattering 有影响力的理论:通往重要的道路

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221131061

Juliane Reinecke, Eva Boxenbaum, Joel Gehman

引用次数: 9

Approaching (super)human intent recognition in stag hunt with the Naïve Utility Calculus generative model 用朴素效用演算生成模型探讨猎鹿中的（超）人类意图识别

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-022-09367-y

Lux Miranda, Ozlem Ozmen Garibary

引用次数: 1

Drone strikes and radicalization: an exploration utilizing agent-based modeling and data applied to Pakistan 无人机袭击和激进化:利用基于代理的建模和数据应用于巴基斯坦的探索

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-022-09364-1

B. Shapiro, A. Crooks

引用次数: 0

Arrested Sensemaking: Typified Suppositions Sink the El Faro 逮捕意义制造:典型的假设击沉埃尔法罗号

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221109280

K. Weick

引用次数: 1

Must I Grow a Pair of Balls to Theorize about Theory in Organization and Management Studies? 我必须长出一副蛋蛋来把组织管理学理论理论化吗?

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221109277

A. Cunliffe

{"title":"Must I Grow a Pair of Balls to Theorize about Theory in Organization and Management Studies?","authors":"A. Cunliffe","doi":"10.1177/26317877221109277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221109277","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a provocation to debate. I argue that work in organization and management studies addressing how to theorize and construct ‘good’ theory is inherently masculinized and embraces a limited pluralism that ignores alternative, reflexive and more human ways of theorizing. As I will illustrate, most of the articles on the topic of theorizing about theory are written by men, and espouse forms of theorizing that are based on a masculinized rationality that privileges abstraction, a logic of objectivity and proceduralization. And while journal editors espouse theoretical pluralism, we are often exhorted to develop ‘theoretical balls’ by conforming to limited definitions of theory that privilege particular ways of knowing and theorizing which are considered imperative to getting published. I argue that there are other equally compelling ways of ‘theorizing’ that focus on who we are as human beings and how we experience self, life and work. I begin with a critique of the literature on theorizing theory, moving on to argue that this currently limits theorizing more humanly and imaginatively, due to ontological blindness, epistemological defensiveness, hegemonic masculinity and myopic self-referentiality. Finally, I offer alternative ways of theorizing and interpreting theory from a more human and reflexive perspective.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"33 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75992541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 33

When Practices Control Practitioners: Integrating self-reinforcing dynamics into practice-based accounts of managing and organizing 当实践控制实践者:将自我强化的动态整合到基于实践的管理和组织账户中

IF 1.8 4区管理学

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221109275

Waldemar Kremser, J. Sydow

{"title":"When Practices Control Practitioners: Integrating self-reinforcing dynamics into practice-based accounts of managing and organizing","authors":"Waldemar Kremser, J. Sydow","doi":"10.1177/26317877221109275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221109275","url":null,"abstract":"Practice theories inform much of current organization and management research by focusing on social practices “in vivo and in situ,” helping us understand how they are produced, reproduced, connected, and eventually transformed by practitioners. Despite the explicit focus of these theories on process, some important dynamics within and across organizations remain undertheorized. This is particularly true for self-reinforcing processes like escalating commitment or path dependence. While such dynamics have been studied quite extensively with the help of other theories, this work often lacks a clear relation or relevance to lived life in organizations. This paper offers an integration of self-reinforcing dynamics into practice-based theorizing, and thereby outlines a new way of understanding self-reinforcement “in vivo and in situ.” By discussing the role and relevance of specific performative linkages as being “weak signals” for self-reinforcement, we provide a new way of analysing this important process phenomenon that is closer to life lived forward, where outcomes are necessarily uncertain, and practitioners can always choose to act differently.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87198522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1