Current Treatment Options in Oncology最新文献

{"title":"Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Andrew M Fang, Jamaal Jackson, Justin R Gregg, Lisly Chery, Chad Tang, Devaki Shilpa Surasi, Bilal A Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Tharakeswara Bathala, Brian F Chapin","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01162-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01162-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Localized high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogenous disease state with a wide range of presentations and outcomes. Historically, non-surgical management with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy was the treatment option of choice. However, surgical resection with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is increasingly utilized as a primary treatment modality for patients with HRPCa. Recent studies have demonstrated that surgery is an equivalent treatment option in select patients with the potential to avoid the side effects from androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy combined. Advances in imaging techniques and biomarkers have also improved staging and patient selection for surgical resection. Advances in robotic surgical technology grant surgeons various techniques to perform RP, even in patients with HR disease, which can reduce the morbidity of the procedure without sacrificing oncologic outcomes. Clinical trials are not only being performed to assess the safety and oncologic outcomes of these surgical techniques, but to also evaluate the role of surgical resection as a part of a multimodal treatment plan. Further research is needed to determine the ideal role of surgery to potentially provide a more personalized and tailored treatment plan for patients with localized HR PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"66-83"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer.","authors":"Courtney A Penn, Mali K Schneiter, Catherine H Watson","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01165-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01165-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and dissection (SLND) should be used as an alternative to full inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFLND) in select patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. IFLND is associated with high postoperative complications such as wound breakdown, lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection. SLND in select patients offers a safe, effective, and less morbid alternative. Candidates for SLND include patients with a unifocal vulvar tumor less than four centimeters, clinically negative lymph nodes, and no prior inguinofemoral surgeries. SLND should ideally be performed by a high-volume SLN surgeon. Most commonly, SLND is performed using both radiocolloid lymphoscintigraphy (e.g., Technetium-99) and a visual tracer such as blue dye; however, near infrared imaging with indocyanine green injection is becoming more widely adopted. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of various techniques for SLND. SLND has been demonstrated to be cost-effective, especially when including perioperative complications. Further studies are needed to demonstrate quality of life differences between IFLND and SLND.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management of Paraneoplastic Syndromes in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"Maxime Junior Jean, Lawrence Samkoff, Nimish Mohile","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01157-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01157-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Our understanding of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) has blossomed over the past few decades. Clinicians have access to more robust diagnostic criteria and have a heightened index of suspicion for these disorders. Nonetheless, treatment, which typically includes immunosuppression, and response to treatment, varies. Due to persistent difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, we favor empiric treatment when a possible diagnosis of PNS is suspected, and other alternative causes have substantially been excluded (e.g., infections, toxic-metabolic derangements, metastasis, or leptomeningeal disease). Treatment of the underlying cancer, if identified, is the first therapeutic step and can prevent disease worsening and in rare cases, can reverse neurologic symptoms. In addition to anti-cancer treatment, first line immunotherapies, which include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) are typically used. If partial or no benefit is seen, second line immunotherapeutic agents such as rituximab are considered. Additionally, the severity of the initial presentation and possible risk for relapse influences the use of the latter agents. Symptomatic management is also an important component in our practice and will depend on the syndrome being treated. One of the more novel entities we are facing currently is the management of immune checkpoint (ICI)-induced PNS. In those cases, current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines are followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"42-65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Therapeutic Management of Malignant Wounds: An Update.","authors":"Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Mihaela Georgescu, Ioana Cristina Marinas, Cem Bulent Ustundag, Gloria Bertesteanu, Mariana Pinteală, Stelian Sergiu Maier, Cristina Maria Al-Matarneh, Marian Angheloiu, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01172-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01172-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Malignant fungating wounds (MFW) are severe skin conditions generating tremendous distress in oncological patients with advanced cancer stages because of pain, malodor, exudation, pruritus, inflammation, edema, and bleeding. The classical therapeutic approaches such as surgery, opioids, antimicrobials, and application of different wound dressings are failing in handling pain, odor, and infection control, thus urgently requiring the development of alternative strategies. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the current therapeutic strategies and the perspectives on developing novel alternatives for better malignant wound management. The last decade screened literature evidenced an increasing interest in developing natural treatment alternatives based on beehive, plant extracts, pure vegetal compounds, and bacteriocins. Promising therapeutics can also be envisaged by involving nanotechnology due to either intrinsic biological activities or drug delivery properties of nanomaterials. Despite recent progress in the field of malignant wound care, the literature is still mainly based on in vitro and in vivo studies on small animal models, while the case reports and clinical trials (less than 10 and only one providing public results) remain scarce. Some innovative treatment approaches are used in clinical practice without prior extensive testing in fungating wound patients. Extensive research is urgently needed to fill this knowledge gap and translate the identified promising therapeutic approaches to more advanced testing stages toward creating multidimensional wound care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"97-126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139467186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Approach to Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Radiation Oncology Perspective.","authors":"Sophia C Kamran, Neha Vapiwala","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01163-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01163-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>High-risk localized prostate cancer is a challenging clinical entity to treat, with heterogeneous responses to an evolving array of multidisciplinary treatment approaches. In addition, this disease state is growing in incidence due to a variety of factors, including shifting recommendations that discouraged routine prostate cancer screening. Current guidelines now incorporate an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening and evaluation. More work is underway to improve targeted screening for certain at-risk populations and to implement greater personalization in the use of diagnostic tools. Once diagnosed with high-risk localized disease, a multimodality treatment paradigm is warranted. Radiation-in its various forms and combinations-plays a large and continually evolving role in the management of high-risk prostate cancer, yet treatment outcomes are still suboptimal. There is a growing need to improve upon current treatment approaches, and better personalize a particular treatment recommendation based on both tumor and patient characteristics, as well as patient preference and goals of therapy. Given that treatment generally requires more than one therapy, there are notable implications on long-term quality of life, especially with respect to overlapping and cumulative side effects of local and systemic therapies, respectively. The desire for aggressive therapy to optimize cancer control outcomes must be weighed against the risk of morbidities and overtreatment and discussed with each patient so that an informed decision about treatment and care can be determined. High-level evidence to support treatment recommendations, where available, is critical for a data-driven and tailored approach to address all goals of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"84-96"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Gynecologic Cancers.","authors":"Mary Katherine Anastasio, Stephanie Shuey, Brittany A Davidson","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01166-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01166-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of targeted cancer therapies with the ability to selectively deliver a cytotoxic drug to a tumor cell using a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic payload. The technology of ADCs allows for tumor-specificity, improved efficacy, and decreased toxicity compared to standard chemotherapy. Common toxicities associated with ADC use include ocular, pulmonary, hematologic, and neurologic toxicities. Several ADCs have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancers, a population with poor outcomes and limited effective treatment options. The first FDA-approved ADC for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer was tisotumab vedotin, a tissue factor-targeting agent, after demonstrating response in the innovaTV 204 trial. Mirvetuximab soravtansine targets folate receptor alpha and is approved for use in patients with folate receptor alpha-positive, platinum-resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer based on results from the SORAYA trial. While there are no FDA-approved ADCs for the treatment of uterine cancer, trastuzumab deruxtecan, an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) agent, is actively being investigated. In this review, we will describe the structure and mechanism of action of ADCs, discuss their toxicity profiles, review ADCs both approved and under investigation for the management of gynecologic cancers, and discuss mechanisms of ADC resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Current Standards, Multidisciplinary Approaches, and Future Directions in the Management of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Margaret Wheless, Rajiv Agarwal, Laura Goff, Natalie Lockney, Chandrasekhar Padmanabhan, Thatcher Heumann","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01153-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01153-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Biliary tract cancers are molecularly and anatomically diverse cancers which include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic (perihilar and distal) cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. While recognized as distinct entities, the rarer incidence of these cancers combined with diagnostic challenges in classifying anatomic origin has resulted in clinical trials and guideline recommended strategies being generalized patients with all types of biliary tract cancer. In this review, we delve into the unique aspects, subtype-specific clinical trial outcomes, and multidisciplinary management of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. When resectable, definitive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (sometimes with selective radiation/chemoradiation) is current standard of care. Due to high recurrence rates, there is growing interest in the use of upfront/neoadjuvant therapy to improve surgical outcomes and to downstage patients who may not initially be resectable. Select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are being successfully treated with novel approaches such as liver transplant. In the advanced disease setting, combination gemcitabine and cisplatin remains the standard base for systemic therapy and was recently improved upon with the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to the chemotherapy doublet in the recently reported TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials. Second-line all-comer treatments for these patients remain limited in both options and efficacy, so clinical trial participation should be strongly considered. With increased use of molecular testing, detection of actionable mutations and opportunities to receive indicated targeted therapies are on the rise and are the most significant driver of improved survival for patients with advanced stage disease. Though these targeted therapies are currently reserved for the second or later line, future trials are looking at moving these to earlier treatment settings and use in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition to cross-disciplinary management with surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, patient-centered care should also include collaboration with advanced endoscopists, palliative care specialists, and nutritionists to improve global patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"127-160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139099136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Strategies to Assess and Manage Frailty among Patients Diagnosed with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors.","authors":"Alayna E Ernster, Heidi D Klepin, Glenn J Lesser","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01167-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11864-023-01167-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Frailty refers to a biologic process that results in reduced physiologic and functional reserve. Patients diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors experience high symptom burden from tumor and tumor-directed treatments that, coupled with previous comorbidities, may contribute to frailty. Within the primary malignant brain tumor population, frailty is known to associate with mortality, higher healthcare utilization, and increased risk of postoperative complications. As such, methods to assess and manage frailty are paramount. However, there is currently no clear consensus on how to best assess and manage frailty throughout the entirety of the disease trajectory. Given the association between frailty and health outcomes, more research is needed to determine best practice protocols for the assessment and management of frailty among patients diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"27-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298213/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139405098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases","authors":"Wendy J. Sherman, Edoardo Romiti, Loizos Michaelides, Diogo Moniz-Garcia, Kaisorn L. Chaichana, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Alyx B. Porter","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139063558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases in the Era of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11864-023-01152-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01152-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Opinion statement</h3> <p>The treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) liver metastases involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes liver-directed therapies (LDT) and systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). LDT has demonstrated efficacy in rapidly reducing tumor bulk, improving symptoms, and delaying disease progression. Interventional radiologists should be consulted prior to switching therapy for patients with progressive or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Long-term follow-up data on the safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization before and after PRRT remain limited. Therefore, a more conservative approach may be to preferentially employ transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients’ somatostatin receptor-avid disease who may be future candidates for PRRT. Notable exceptions where radioembolization may be a preferred treatment strategy may be patients with history of biliary tract instrumentation, asymmetric unilobar disease distribution, and rapidly progressive diffuse liver involvement. Selection of local treatment modality, sequencing, and combination of LDT with systemic therapy require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138681208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}