{"title":"The significance of Kant's philosophy for the revival of Polish philosophy at the turn of the 20th century","authors":"Patryk Głowacki","doi":"10.5209/kant.95637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.95637","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141641983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"¿Glauben o Wissen? La falsa simplicidad del rechazo kantiano al ateísmo.","authors":"Julia Muñoz Velasco","doi":"10.5209/kant.94466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.94466","url":null,"abstract":"En el “Prólogo” a la segunda edición de la Crítica de la Razón Pura, Kant afirma: “Debí, por tanto, suprimir el saber, para obtener lugar para la fe”. (Bxxx) En el presente trabajo tomaré como punto de partida este famoso pasaje para mostrar por qué Kant rechaza cualquier concepción metafísica del ateísmo, al mismo tiempo que desplaza la discusión del plano metafísico al psicológico. De igual forma señalaré que, aunque este desplazamiento esté aparentemente justificado por la razón práctica, la apuesta kantiana por una especie de teísmo psicológico-práctico encierra diversos problemas para su sistema filosófico. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141642356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"O Progresso Kantiano dos Insociáveis: Unir a História e a Moral numa Realidade Agonística","authors":"Inês Pinheiro","doi":"10.5209/kant.94846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.94846","url":null,"abstract":"O ponto de partida para este artigo é a questão: “Onde é que o progresso kantiano deixa os mais vulneráveis?” Consequentemente, o nosso propósito é estudar a ideia de “progresso” no domínio prático do pensamento kantiano, nomeadamente nas suas dimensões política, social e histórica, relacionando-o com a noção antropológica de “sociabilidade insociável”. Ao fazê-lo, o nosso derradeiro objetivo é propor uma reflexão sobre o progresso kantiano que questione como é que este lida com a realidade, não apenas no sentido mais lato da sua possibilidade, mas principalmente naquilo que concerne a enfrentar a arena agonística das nossas sociedades, na qual não conseguimos escapar à existência de conflitos sociais que deixam muitos vulneráveis e em sofrimento.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"42 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141643467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"¿Religión a pesar de la Ilustración?","authors":"Luis Placencia, R. Enskat","doi":"10.5209/kant.95044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.95044","url":null,"abstract":"La cuestión de si la ilustración es posible a través de la ciencia o necesaria a pesar de la ciencia, al igual que la cuestión de si la religión es necesaria y posible a pesar de la ilustración y la ciencia, ha estado a la orden del día desde el siglo XVIII. Con la gran excepción de Platón, el problema sólo fue realmente comprendido por los filósofos de los siglos XVII y XVIII. En este trabajo se abordan algunas de las aristas que presentan a Kant como la cúspide de los intentos del S. XVIII por responder a las preguntas filosóficas antedichas.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141642209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Necessity of the Discipline of Pure Reason for the Systematicity of the Practical Use of Reason in Kant’s Critical Philosophy","authors":"F. Baghai","doi":"10.5209/kant.91736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.91736","url":null,"abstract":"Kant’s critical philosophy cannot realize its stated purpose to make metaphysics systematic unless it makes all metaphysical uses of reason, including the practical use of reason, systematic. Yet Kant’s account of the systematicity of the practical use of reason is not entirely clear. In particular, none of the variations of his account of the systematicity of the practical use of reason explicitly discusses the role of the discipline of pure reason in making the practical use of reason systematic. The apparent absence of the discipline from Kant’s account is contrary to indications in his writings indirectly suggesting that the discipline plays an indispensable role in the systematicity of the practical use of reason. This discrepancy remains unaddressed in the scholarship. Most interpreters reconstruct Kant’s account of the systematicity of the practical use of reason without attributing any role to the discipline. This article aims to make explicit the role of the discipline in Kant’s account of the systematicity of the practical use of reason. Specifically, it suggests that the discipline of pure reason is the first necessary condition for the systematicity of the practical use of reason: it prepares the ground for a justifiable conception of the ideal of the highest good and for legitimate postulates regarding the immortality of the soul and the existence of God.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kant, Anthropocentrism, and Animal Welfare","authors":"Holly L. Wilson","doi":"10.5209/kant.91363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.91363","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This paper will argue six reasons why Kant is an anthropocentric, but not an anthropo-supremacist. It will lay out Kant’s case against animal egalitarianism, and how Kant’s moral theory nevertheless provides sufficient obligations not to be cruel to other animal species and to care about their welfare. This paper will show how Kant’s moral theory will apply in concrete detail with one species of non-human animal, namely the dairy cow. A dairy farmer who is also motived by Kantian virtue will have enough moral incentive to care about their dairy cows even though Kant’s duties to other animal species are indirect and not direct.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"295 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139183027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kant, Global Politics and Cosmopolitan Law. A Reply to G. Geismann","authors":"Claudio Corradetti","doi":"10.5209/kant.88775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.88775","url":null,"abstract":"In this reply I rebut Mr Geismann’s unproved charges to my work on Kant’s cosmopolitanism. In my study I argue for a novel reading for the ‘world republic’ (Weltrepublik) in regulative terms. I defend also a non-perfectionist model of politics which for Kant brings us to a continuous normative striving for improvement. Unfortunately, Geismann has deliberately misunderstood the distinctive proposal I advance. The dismissive attitude towards my thesis reveals also discriminatory structural problem of certain Kantian conservative scholarship towards innovative proposals coming from academically not-aligned interpreters.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"61 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"El primer Kant ante la metafísica: una aproximación histórica a los orígenes de una actitud intelectual.—II. Ambientes intelectuales—","authors":"Paulo Sergio Mendoza Gurrola","doi":"10.5209/kant.88682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.88682","url":null,"abstract":"Este trabajo continúa el esfuerzo de contribuir, desde la perspectiva de la Kantforschung y usando principios metodológicos de la historia intelectual, al conocimiento de los contextos inmediato y general en los cuales circularon las diferentes doctrinas metafísicas que Kant pudo conocer durante los años de su formación universitaria y que pudieron influir en sus primeras actitudes de cara a la metafísica. Primero, se reconstruye el ambiente intelectual inmediato haciendo una aproximación a los profesores que dictaron cursos de metafísica cuando Kant era estudiante en la Albertina; después, se trata la situación de las principales doctrinas metafísicas en Prusia durante la primera mitad del siglo XVIII, particularmente de cara al desarrollo de la ciencia natural moderna; finalmente, contrastando las características de los ambientes intelectuales inmediato y general, se sugiere una explicación sobre cómo el perfil del joven Kant pudo formarse como un ecléctico independiente antiwolffiano.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Le condizioni materiali del pensiero. Corpo, forza e facoltà nell’Allgemeine Naturgeschichte","authors":"M. Costantini","doi":"10.5209/kant.91729","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.91729","url":null,"abstract":"Il contributo esamina la terza parte dell’Allgemeine Naturgeschichte, scritta da Kant nel 1755, e si concentra in particolare sul rapporto mente-corpo. In particolare, il contributo evidenzia la presenza di due retoriche nel discorso kantiano. Nella prima, il corpo è ritenuto limitazione dello spirito, il quale svilupperebbe appieno le proprie facoltà conoscitive se non fosse legato a una materia. Nella seconda, invece, il corpo, o meglio la qualità materica del corpo, dona allo spirito la facoltà di poter esercitare la forza del pensiero.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kant and “tabula Russia”","authors":"Vadim Chaly","doi":"10.5209/kant.91754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.91754","url":null,"abstract":"The article offers an attempt to understand the present state of Kant’s legacy in Russia on the threshold of the Tercentenary. An explanans is found in the metaphors of “tabula rasa” and “unplowed virgin soil,” first used by Leibniz in relation to Russia in his letters and memoranda addressed to tsar Peter I and other members of the Russian elite, which became the country’s “absolute metaphors to live by” up to present time. Several known and unknown episodes from the history of the reception of Kantian ideas, his followers in Russia, and the transformation of the urban environment of Kant’s life in Königsberg, as it was becoming Kaliningrad, are presented through the prism of this metaphor. Without hoping to make specific recommendations of any use from such metaphorical grounds, this study aims to emphasize the depth, interconnectedness, and basic, metaphysical tension of the relationship between Europe and Russia, which cannot be terminated at will by either side, or by a third party. In a situation where the sides are doomed to dialog, Kant, appropriated by Russia as its “subject,” occupies the unique position of mediator of philosophical understanding and peaceful action.","PeriodicalId":504999,"journal":{"name":"Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}