Acoustics最新文献

{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Nord2000, RTN-96 and CNOSSOS-EU against Noise Measurements in Central Jutland, Denmark","authors":"Jibran Khan, E. Thysell, C. Backalarz, P. Finne, Ole Hertel, S. Jensen","doi":"10.3390/acoustics5040062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics5040062","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to assess the performance of Nord2000, RTN-96, and CNOSSOS-EU, the Nordic and European noise prediction standards, in predicting daily LAeq24h and Lden levels (dBA), by comparing them with measurements gathered over 76 days from the E45 motorway in Helsted, Central Jutland, Denmark. In addition, the article investigates the potential viability of utilizing Confidence-Weighting Average (CWA) for data fusion to enhance noise estimation accuracy. The results showed highly positive Spearman’s correlations (RS), reflecting strong agreements between observed and predicted data, Nord2000 = 0.85–0.98, CNOSSOS-EU = 0.79–0.92 and RTN-96 = 0.86–0.91. Model differences, RMSE = 0.4–3.3 dBA (Nord2000), 1.4 = 2.8 dBA (CNOSSOS) and 1.3–4.2 dBA (RTN-96), were mainly due to underlying model parametrization and uncertainties in model inputs. Overall, Nord2000 outperformed CNOSSOS and RTN-96 in reproducing observed noise levels. Moreover, CNOSSOS agreed well with the measured data and exhibited a high potential for noise mapping and health assessments. Likewise, the CWA is found to be a promising, forward-looking data fusion approach to improve noise estimates’ accuracy. More research is required to further evaluate the models in greater detail over a larger geographical area and across varied temporal scales (e.g., hourly, yearly).","PeriodicalId":502373,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics","volume":"180 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139251961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reducing Data Requirements for Simple and Effective Noise Mapping: A Case Study of Noise Mapping Using Computational Methods and GIS for the Raebareli City Intersection","authors":"Md Iltaf Zafar, S. Bharadwaj, R. Dubey, S. Tiwary, Susham Biswas","doi":"10.3390/acoustics5040061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics5040061","url":null,"abstract":"The accurate prediction of noise levels at outdoor locations requires detailed data of the noise sources and terrain parameters and an efficient model for prediction. However, the possibility of predicting noise with reasonable accuracy using less input data is a challenge and needs to be studied scientifically. The qualities of the noise data, terrain parameters, and prediction model can impact the accuracy of the prediction significantly. This study primarily focuses on the dependency of noise data for efficient noise prediction and mapping. This research article proposes a detailed methodology to predict and map the noise and exposure levels in Ratapur, Uttar Pradesh, India, with various granularities of noise data inputs. The noise levels were measured at various places and at different times of the day at 10 min intervals. Different data input proportions and qualities were used for noise prediction, namely, (1) a large data-based method, (2) a small data-based method, (3) a source point average data-based method, (4) a Google navigation data-based method, and (5) accurate modelling using an ANN-based method, integrating accurate noise data with a sophisticated modelling algorithm for noise prediction. The analysis of the variation between the predicted and measured noise levels was conducted for all five of the methods using the ANOVA technique. Various methods based on less noise data methods predicted the noise levels with accuracies within the ±4–10 dB(A) range, while the ANN-based technique predicted it with an accuracy of ±0.5–2.5 dB(A). Interestingly, the estimation of the noise exposure levels (>85 dB(A)) and the identification of hazard zones around the studied road intersection could also be performed efficiently even when using the data-deficient models. This paper also showcased the possibility of predicting an accurate 3D map for an area by extracting vehicles and terrain features from satellite images without any direct recording of noise data. This paper thus demonstrated approaches to reduce the noise data dependency for noise prediction and mapping and to enable accurate noise-hazard zonation mapping.","PeriodicalId":502373,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139276804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}