Performance Evaluation of Nord2000, RTN-96 and CNOSSOS-EU against Noise Measurements in Central Jutland, Denmark

Acoustics Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.3390/acoustics5040062
Jibran Khan, E. Thysell, C. Backalarz, P. Finne, Ole Hertel, S. Jensen
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Nord2000, RTN-96 and CNOSSOS-EU against Noise Measurements in Central Jutland, Denmark","authors":"Jibran Khan, E. Thysell, C. Backalarz, P. Finne, Ole Hertel, S. Jensen","doi":"10.3390/acoustics5040062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to assess the performance of Nord2000, RTN-96, and CNOSSOS-EU, the Nordic and European noise prediction standards, in predicting daily LAeq24h and Lden levels (dBA), by comparing them with measurements gathered over 76 days from the E45 motorway in Helsted, Central Jutland, Denmark. In addition, the article investigates the potential viability of utilizing Confidence-Weighting Average (CWA) for data fusion to enhance noise estimation accuracy. The results showed highly positive Spearman’s correlations (RS), reflecting strong agreements between observed and predicted data, Nord2000 = 0.85–0.98, CNOSSOS-EU = 0.79–0.92 and RTN-96 = 0.86–0.91. Model differences, RMSE = 0.4–3.3 dBA (Nord2000), 1.4 = 2.8 dBA (CNOSSOS) and 1.3–4.2 dBA (RTN-96), were mainly due to underlying model parametrization and uncertainties in model inputs. Overall, Nord2000 outperformed CNOSSOS and RTN-96 in reproducing observed noise levels. Moreover, CNOSSOS agreed well with the measured data and exhibited a high potential for noise mapping and health assessments. Likewise, the CWA is found to be a promising, forward-looking data fusion approach to improve noise estimates’ accuracy. More research is required to further evaluate the models in greater detail over a larger geographical area and across varied temporal scales (e.g., hourly, yearly).","PeriodicalId":502373,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics","volume":"180 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics5040062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to assess the performance of Nord2000, RTN-96, and CNOSSOS-EU, the Nordic and European noise prediction standards, in predicting daily LAeq24h and Lden levels (dBA), by comparing them with measurements gathered over 76 days from the E45 motorway in Helsted, Central Jutland, Denmark. In addition, the article investigates the potential viability of utilizing Confidence-Weighting Average (CWA) for data fusion to enhance noise estimation accuracy. The results showed highly positive Spearman’s correlations (RS), reflecting strong agreements between observed and predicted data, Nord2000 = 0.85–0.98, CNOSSOS-EU = 0.79–0.92 and RTN-96 = 0.86–0.91. Model differences, RMSE = 0.4–3.3 dBA (Nord2000), 1.4 = 2.8 dBA (CNOSSOS) and 1.3–4.2 dBA (RTN-96), were mainly due to underlying model parametrization and uncertainties in model inputs. Overall, Nord2000 outperformed CNOSSOS and RTN-96 in reproducing observed noise levels. Moreover, CNOSSOS agreed well with the measured data and exhibited a high potential for noise mapping and health assessments. Likewise, the CWA is found to be a promising, forward-looking data fusion approach to improve noise estimates’ accuracy. More research is required to further evaluate the models in greater detail over a larger geographical area and across varied temporal scales (e.g., hourly, yearly).
根据丹麦中部日德兰地区的噪声测量结果对 Nord2000、RTN-96 和 CNOSSOS-EU 进行性能评估
本文旨在评估北欧和欧洲噪声预测标准 Nord2000、RTN-96 和 CNOSSOS-EU 在预测每日 LAeq24h 和 Lden 水平(dBA)方面的性能,并将其与在丹麦中部日德兰半岛赫尔斯泰德的 E45 高速公路上收集的 76 天测量数据进行比较。此外,文章还研究了利用置信度加权平均(CWA)进行数据融合以提高噪声估计精度的潜在可行性。结果表明,斯皮尔曼相关性(RS)呈高度正相关,反映了观测数据与预测数据之间的高度一致,Nord2000 = 0.85-0.98,CNOSSOS-EU = 0.79-0.92,RTN-96 = 0.86-0.91。模型差异 RMSE = 0.4-3.3 dBA(Nord2000)、1.4 = 2.8 dBA(CNOSSOS)和 1.3-4.2 dBA(RTN-96),主要是由于基本模型参数化和模型输入的不确定性造成的。总体而言,Nord2000 在再现观测噪声水平方面优于 CNOSSOS 和 RTN-96。此外,CNOSSOS 与测量数据吻合良好,在噪声绘图和健康评估方面具有很高的潜力。同样,CWA 被认为是一种有前途的前瞻性数据融合方法,可提高噪声估计的准确性。需要进行更多的研究,以便在更大的地理区域和不同的时间尺度(如每小时、每年)上对模型进行更详细的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信