Environmental and Resource Economics最新文献_第4页

Improving Recycling: How Far Should We Go? 改进回收利用：我们应该走多远？

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00880-z

Paul Belleflamme, Huan Ha

引用次数: 0

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Unsustainable PPE Materials: A Correlation and Causality Analysis COVID-19 大流行与不可持续的个人防护设备材料：相关性和因果关系分析

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00870-1

Konstantinos N. Baltas, Robert Mann, Nicholaos C. Baltas

引用次数: 0

Do People Respond to the Climate Impact of their Behavior? The Effect of Carbon Footprint Information on Grocery Purchases 人们会对其行为的气候影响做出反应吗？碳足迹信息对购买食品杂货的影响

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00873-y

T. Fosgaard, Alice Pizzo, S. Sadoff

引用次数: 2

Optimal Ecosystem Change in the Presence of Ecosystem-Mediated Human Health Impacts 生态系统介导的人类健康影响下的最佳生态系统变化

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00874-x

Katherine D. Lee, D. Finnoff, Peter Daszak

引用次数: 0

Effects of Low Emission Zones on Air Quality, New Vehicle Registrations, and Birthweights: Evidence from Japan 低排放区对空气质量、新车注册量和出生体重的影响：来自日本的证据

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00875-w

Shuhei Nishitateno, Paul J. Burke

引用次数: 0

Increased Marginal Damages of Air Emissions Following Improvements in Air Quality in the United States 美国空气质量改善后空气排放的边际损失增加

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00871-0

Andrew L. Goodkind

{"title":"Increased Marginal Damages of Air Emissions Following Improvements in Air Quality in the United States","authors":"Andrew L. Goodkind","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00871-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00871-0","url":null,"abstract":"Between 2002 and 2017, concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) decreased 37% in the United States. Environmental economic theory generally assumes that environmental improvement is associated with a decrease in the marginal damage of emissions. In this case, the marginal damages of PM2.5 precursor emissions (NH3, NOX, primary PM2.5, and SO2) increased substantially. I calculate the change in the marginal damages of emissions between 2002 and 2017, finding increases, on average, of 30% for NH3, 46% for NOX, 61% for primary PM2.5, and 36% for SO2. The increase in marginal damages is especially large in the southeastern United States, with values more than double over this time period. The key factors that influence this change in marginal damages are the shape of the concentration-response (C-R) function that was adopted for these calculations between PM2.5 exposure and mortality (positive effect), the increase in the real value of a statistical life (positive effect), the increased population (positive effect), the aging of the population (positive effect), the decreased age-specific mortality rates (negative effect), and the geographic distribution of emissions (mixed effect). Between 32 and 65% of the increase in marginal damages is attributable to the shape of the C-R function and the decreased concentration of PM2.5. The C-R function adopted here indicates that the marginal effect of concentration reductions is higher at lower concentrations. Thus, at the lower PM2.5 concentrations resulting from improvements over 15 years, there would be a larger reduction in mortality from each additional unit of pollution reduction.","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140883729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Natural Resources and Undernourishment in Developing Countries? Is There a Curse? 发展中国家的自然资源与营养不良？是否存在诅咒？

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00877-8

Henri Njangang, Sosson Tadadjeu, Joseph Keneck-Massil

引用次数: 0

Correction to: Economics of Informed Antibiotic Management and Judicious Use Policies in Animal Agriculture 更正：畜牧业中知情抗生素管理和合理使用政策的经济学意义

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00876-9

David Hennessy, H. Feng, Yanan Jia

引用次数: 0

Land Subsidence Impacts and Optimal Groundwater Management in South Africa 南非的土地沉降影响和地下水优化管理

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00857-y

Nelson Ndakolute Ndahangwapo, Djiby Racine Thiam, Ariel Dinar

{"title":"Land Subsidence Impacts and Optimal Groundwater Management in South Africa","authors":"Nelson Ndakolute Ndahangwapo, Djiby Racine Thiam, Ariel Dinar","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00857-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00857-y","url":null,"abstract":"Fresh surface water is increasingly becoming scarcer worldwide, leading to significant groundwater over-extraction. However, groundwater over-extraction could result in many environmental externalities including various land subsidence (LS) effects. LS causes the gradual reduction of the voids and the subsequent ground surface sinking. The loss of aquifer system storage capacity, owing to LS, is one such negative externality that is seldom discussed in the economic literature. In this paper, we investigate the indirect loss of the aquifer system storage capacity due to LS along with other direct LS negative externalities. We develop a dynamic economic optimization model for groundwater utilization and evaluate various policy instruments (quota systems, taxes on land sinking and aquifer storage loss, and packaging and sequencing of taxes and quotas) to prevent overexploitation externalities. The model is calibrated to South African data. We found that taxes on land sinking and aquifer system storage capacity reduction have a significant effect on withdrawals and water table levels. Taxes provide larger social welfare. In addition, under certain circumstances, quotas are preferable when it comes to supporting groundwater conservation practices. Packaging and sequencing provide the second largest social benefits.","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140830859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Does Rationalization Improve Economy-Wide Welfare? A General Equilibrium Analysis of a Regional Fishery in a Developed Country 合理化能否改善整个经济体的福利？发达国家区域渔业的一般均衡分析

Environmental and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00869-8

Chang K. Seung, Do-Hoon Kim, Ju-Hyun Yi

引用次数: 0