IBLAM Law Review最新文献

PENEGAKAN SANKSI DISIPLIN BERAT TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL DI LINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN 对交通部的公务员实施严厉的纪律制裁

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i2.402

Ahmad Muhid Estiyanto

{"title":"PENEGAKAN SANKSI DISIPLIN BERAT TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL DI LINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN","authors":"Ahmad Muhid Estiyanto","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i2.402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.402","url":null,"abstract":"Untuk mendukung reformasi birokrasi dan kelancaran pemerintahan dan pembangunan, Aparatur Sipil Negara harus bekerja lebih profesional, bermoral, bersih, dan beretika sebagai bagian dari aparatur negara. PNS harus mematuhi peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di bidang sumber daya manusia dan bidang lainnya untuk memberikan contoh yang baik kepada masyarakat. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil menggantikan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Hukum digunakan dalam penelitian non-dogmatis atau empiris ini untuk mengkomunikasikan makna simbolik dalam hubungan antar aktor sosial. Investigasi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tiga jenis tindakan disipliner berat yang diterapkan terhadap PNS di Kementerian Perhubungan sesuai dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Pertama, mereka akan diturunkan jabatannya selama 12 bulan; kedua, mereka akan dibebaskan jabatannya selama 12 bulan; dan ketiga, mereka akan diberhentikan sebagai PNS dengan hormat tanpa permohonan sendiri. Peraturan BKN Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 membahas tata cara pemberian sanksi disiplin berat, termasuk pembentukan tim pemeriksaan, pemanggilan, penyidikan, penetapan sanksi disiplin berat, dan penyampaian sanksi disiplin berat. Menurut penelitian, berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil, dan Peraturan BKN Nomor 6 Tahun 2022, Kementerian Perhubungan telah menjatuhkan sanksi disiplin berat. Atasan yang kurang aktif menangani kasus pelanggaran disipliner dan pegawai yang diduga melakukan pelanggaran belum diberhentikan sementara dari jabatannya adalah dua hal yang menghambat pelaksanaan tindakan disipliner berat. Salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan penegakan sanksi disiplin yang keras adalah dengan meningkatkan ruang lingkup perbaikan dan meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia.","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"20 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141339192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Pidana Illegal Loging Di Kawasan Hutan Indonesia 印度尼西亚林区非法采伐犯罪行为的法理分析

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.376

Feny Windiyastuti

引用次数: 0

SURROGATE MOTHER “RENTAL AGREEMENT MADE IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY 代孕母亲 "在公证人在场的情况下签订的租房协议

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.308

Sonny Gondo Hudaya, Habib Adjie

引用次数: 0

IMPLEMTASI PERSETUJUAN DPR PADA PEREKRUTAN HAKIM AGUNG BERDASARKAN UUD RI TAHUN 1945 根据 1945 年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》在最高法院法官招聘中实施 DPR 批准制度

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.358

S. Aminah

引用次数: 0

PERANAN BUKTI ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC EVDENCE) DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN HUKUM PERKARA TATA USAHA NEGARA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP 科学证据在国家环境行政案件法律裁决中的作用

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.264

Cecep Aminudin

引用次数: 0

AUTHORITY OF NURSES TO INSTALL INFUSATIONS DURING THE PANDEMIC OUTSIDE OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES 在大流行期间，护士有权在医疗机构外进行输液

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.349

Prihatin Effendi, Mohammad Nasichim

引用次数: 0

AUTHORITY OF NOTARY IN LEGALIZING THE UNDER-HAND AGREEMENT DEED: EXAMINING RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES 公证员在使地下协议契约合法化方面的权力：审查责任和法律后果

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.337

Prima Resi Putri, Elyana Novira, Febrina Annisa, Dwi Astuti Palupi

{"title":"AUTHORITY OF NOTARY IN LEGALIZING THE UNDER-HAND AGREEMENT DEED: EXAMINING RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES","authors":"Prima Resi Putri, Elyana Novira, Febrina Annisa, Dwi Astuti Palupi","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.337","url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the legal authority of notaries in legalizing underhand deed agreements based on their responsibilities and legal consequences. The method used in this research is normative legal research method, which is based on statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results obtained show that the responsibility of a notary in legalizing a deed agreement under the hand must be able to guarantee that he is able to carry out, implement, and realize the existence of laws governing the activities of legalizing letters under the hand including to see or check the validity of agreements made by related parties by being careful and disciplined in carrying out procedures for legalizing letters under the hand in accordance with the Notary Position Law. The legal consequences arising in the ratification of the agreement of the deed under the hand, namely if the letter has been legalized by the Notary, the letter under the hand has formal evidentiary power but does not have outward and material evidentiary power. In carrying out its duties, if a Notary is proven to have violated the law, it can be subject to civil sanctions in the form of reimbursement of costs, compensation and interest by passing the evidentiary process. However, a Notary cannot be convicted if they have not committed a violation of a criminal article and have acted in the interest of implementing the provisions of the Notary Law","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"306 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140474131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOYCOTT PRODUCTS SUSPECTED OF SUPPORTING GENOCIDE 抵制涉嫌支持种族灭绝的产品的国际法律分析

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.328

Andri Sutrisno

{"title":"INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOYCOTT PRODUCTS SUSPECTED OF SUPPORTING GENOCIDE","authors":"Andri Sutrisno","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.328","url":null,"abstract":"This jurnal explores the significance of boycotting products suspected of supporting genocide within the framework of international law. The complex relationship between human rights, state responsibility to prevent genocide, and the international community's response to violations of international norms is at the heart of this investigation. The study defines boycott as a form of isolation undertaken by individuals or groups against an entity, encompassing actions like blacklisting, embargoes, and blockades, targeting various products from consumer goods to academic and sports products. Governments, either individually or collectively, issue boycott resolutions, as exemplified by Arab countries' historic boycott against Israel. The paper also introduces other forms of boycotts, such as investment withdrawal, divestment, and sanctions, citing examples like Sudan. Framing the discussion within the context of the United Nations Genocide Convention, the jurnal argues that product boycotts can serve as tools for enforcing compliance with the convention, holding states accountable for preventing genocide. Moreover, product boycotts play a vital role in the international public sphere, mobilizing global public opinion and exerting social, economic, and political pressure on perpetrators of genocide. The study addresses critical questions, focusing on the role of product boycotts as sanctions in international law and their impact on garnering global support and pressuring perpetrators, while providing a voice to victims. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, relying on literature review and secondary legal sources, including journals, articles, and news related to the international legal analysis of the boycott of products suspected of supporting genocide. The jurnal concludes by emphasizing the importance of boycotting products suspected of supporting genocide within the international legal framework, not only as a form of protest but as a","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"689 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140474663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

MENAKAR DALUWARSA: Kajian Perbandingan Daluwarsa Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana 衡量失效：刑法改革中伪造邮件行为失效的比较研究

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.310

Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Hajairin Hajairin

{"title":"MENAKAR DALUWARSA: Kajian Perbandingan Daluwarsa Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana","authors":"Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Hajairin Hajairin","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.310","url":null,"abstract":"Comparative study of the expiration of mail forgery in Law No. 1/1946 on Criminal Code and Law No. 1/2023 on Criminal Code. This comparative study is intended to understand the differences and similarities of expiration in the prosecution of criminal cases, so that expiration can be a legal instrument that can realize justice for all parties to criminal cases. The method used is normative legal research, normative legal research is also to inventory positive law, find legal principles and doctrines, synchronize existing laws and regulations and conduct research by studying and examining and tracing various existing literature. With several approaches, namely the Legislative Approach, Historical Approach, Comparative Approach and Conceptual Approach. The findings in the results of this study are a comparative study of the expiration of mail forgery, in Law/1/1946 / Criminal Code and Law/1/2023 / Criminal Code it can be concluded that the authority to prosecute a criminal offender can be abolished regulated in Article 78 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regarding Forgery in general is regulated in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. After the reform of criminal law, the authority to prosecute is declared void due to expiration is regulated in Article 163 of Law No. 1/2023 / Criminal Code, but regarding the explanation of the offense of forgery of letters is contained in Articles 391 and 392 of Law No. 1/2023 / Criminal Code. Comparison of the expiration of mail forgery in the Criminal Code and the New Criminal Code from the aspect of offense formulation and expiration limitation is very different, but there is a similarity in placing the object that can be subject to the crime of mail forgery, namely a person who makes a fake letter and uses a fake letter.","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"243 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140473880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM PERATURAN KAPOLRI NO 6 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PENETAPAN TERSANGKA 关于确定嫌疑人的警察局长条例（2019 年第 6 号）中确定嫌疑人的有效性问题

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.317

R. Adawiyah, Evi Retno Wulan

引用次数: 0