Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

{"title":"Healthcare utilization impacts of an eConsult program for headache at an academic medical center.","authors":"Margaret H Downes, Rachelle Morgenstern, Georges Naasan, Shanna Patterson, Anna Pace, Parul Agarwal, Susan Shin, Rory Abrams, Bridget Mueller, James Young, Ronald Tamler, Barbara G Vickrey, Benjamin R Kummer","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231207908","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231207908","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionInterprofessional consultations (\"eConsults\") can reduce healthcare utilization. However, the impact of eConsults on healthcare utilization remains poorly characterized among patients with headache.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, 1:1 matched cohort study comparing patients evaluated for headache via eConsult request or in-person referral at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. Groups were matched on clinical and demographic characteristics. Our primary outcome was one or more outpatient headache-related encounters in 6 months following referral date. Secondary outcomes included one or more all-cause outpatient neurology and headache-related emergency department (ED) encounters during the same period. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to model associations between independent variables and outcomes.ResultsWe identified 74 patients with headache eConsults who were matched to 74 patients with in-person referrals. Patients in the eConsult group were less likely to achieve the primary outcome (29.7% vs 62.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or have an all-cause outpatient neurology encounter (33.8% vs 79.7%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) than patients in the comparison group. Both groups did not significantly differ by headache-related ED encounters. In multivariable analyses, patients in the eConsult group had significantly lower odds of having one or more headache-related or all-cause neurology encounters than patients in the comparison group (odds ratio (OR) 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.6; OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.1-0.3, respectively).DiscussionIn comparison to in-person referrals, eConsult requests for headache were associated with reduced likelihood of outpatient neurology encounters in the short-term but not with differential use of headache-related ED encounters. Larger-scale, prospective studies should validate our findings and assess patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"680-689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing the suitability of virtual versus in-person care: Perceptions from pediatricians.","authors":"Russell Leong, Kate E Sanderson, Anne F Klassen, Elyanne M Ratcliffe, Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231205329","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231205329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic compelled a portion of healthcare to be delivered virtually. As the pandemic waned, health systems strived to find a balance between re-incorporating in-person care while maintaining virtual care. To find when virtual or in-person encounters are more appropriate, we surveyed pediatricians' perceptions when comparing the suitability of virtual care to in-person care.MethodsWe surveyed a Canadian tertiary-level pediatric hospital where pediatricians assessed whether specific clinical encounters or tasks were more or less effective virtually than when performed in person. Pediatricians also rated the importance of clinical and patient factors when deciding if a patient needs to be seen in person.ResultsOf 160 pediatrics faculty members, 56 (35%) responded to the survey. When assessing different types of clinical encounters, triage, multidisciplinary meetings, discharge, and follow ups were more likely to favor virtual encounters. However, first consultations and family meetings were more likely to favor in-person encounters. Regarding clinical tasks, pediatricians were more likely to endorse explaining test results, offering treatment recommendations, and obtaining patient histories virtually. On the contrary, there was a preference for physical examinations, assessing patients visually, and assessing developmental milestones to be performed in person. When deciding if a patient should be seen in person versus virtual, pediatricians rated the patient's condition and communication barriers as the most important factors favoring an in-person appointment.DiscussionThese results offer an initial framework for pediatricians when choosing which encounter type may be most appropriate for their patients between virtual or in-person appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"667-672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prehospital stroke scales outperform National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in predicting large vessel occlusion in a large academic telestroke network.","authors":"Stephen W English, Nikita Chhabra, Abigail E Hanus, Rida Basharath, Monet Miller, Richard J Butterfield, Nan Zhang, Bart M Demaerschalk","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231204066","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231204066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPrehospital telestroke evaluations may improve stroke triage compared to paramedic-applied large vessel occlusion scales, but ambulance-based video National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessments are challenging. The accuracy of telestroke-administered large vessel occlusion scales has not been investigated, so we sought to evaluate this further.MethodsThis retrospective study included all in-hospital telestroke encounters in a large academic telestroke network from 2019 to 2020. We retrospectively calculated seven large vessel occlusion scales using the in-hospital telestroke National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 3-Item Stroke Scale, Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity, Vision-Aphasia-Neglect, and Gaze-Face-Arm-Speech-Time). Diagnostic performance was assessed via sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy using established scale thresholds. These results were compared to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at thresholds of 6, 8, and 10. The area under curve was calculated using c-statistics by treating scales as continuous variables.ResultsA total of 625 patients were included; 111 (17.8%) patients had an anterior large vessel occlusion, 118 (18.9%) patients had any large vessel occlusion, and 182 (29.1%) patients had stroke mimic diagnosis. The mean age (SD) was 67.9 (15.9), 48.3% were female, and 93.4% were white. The Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (SD) was 14.9 (8.4) for patients with anterior large vessel occlusion, 4.7 (5.0) for patients with non-large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, and 4.4 (5.8) for stroke mimic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, and Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scales demonstrated higher accuracy and area under curve for large vessel occlusion detection.DiscussionBoth the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination and Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation scales outperformed the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for large vessel occlusion detection in patients evaluated by in-hospital telestroke. These scales may be valid alternatives to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale examination in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"647-655"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The impact of resistance on telemedicine use for people with disabilities.","authors":"Karen M Keptner, Michele Heath","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231213412","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231213412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with disabilities face many challenges in accessing healthcare. They may be provided opportunities to utilize new technologies just like non-disabled patients, but their unique challenges might cause them to resist new technology. The purpose of the study is to explore reasons why disabled patients might resist telemedicine. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed open-ended questions from a larger telemedicine survey for people with disabilities in the United States. The analysis identified the following themes: <i>concerns about the patient-provider relationship and trust, worry about security and privacy, telemedicine has its place - but not for every type of visit, and concerns with overutilization and cost.</i> The paper demonstrated that while telemedicine provides convenience to patients in terms of removing barriers such as transportation and cost, patients still value their doctor relationship and certain features of in-person visits. Resistance to telemedicine occurred on both individual and structural levels. This study has implications for institutions serving people with disabilities through remote means.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"705-714"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Medication adherence in patients with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of telemedicine interventions.","authors":"Khadijeh Moulaei, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy, Hamid Sharifi","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231211355","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231211355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and objectiveTelemedicine interventions have emerged as a promising solution to improve medication adherence by providing remote support and monitoring of patients with mental disorders. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in enhancing medication adherence among patients with mental disorders.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically. After deleting the double-included studies, two researchers independently selected articles and extracted data using a standardized data collection form. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The intervention effects were combined using a random effects model. Standardized mean differences (Hedges's g) between the treatment and control groups were calculated. Heterogeneity variance was estimated using the Q test and I² statistic. The analysis was performed in Stata version 17.0.ResultsOut of the 1088 articles retrieved, nine studies were included in the analysis. Overall, telemedicine interventions demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in medication adherence among patients with mental disorders (Hedges' g = 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.38, <i>p</i>-value: < 0.01). The type of mental disorder was a significant moderator of the heterogeneity between studies (<i>p</i> = 0.022).ConclusionTelemedicine interventions have a positive impact on medication adherence in patients with mental disorders by offering remote support and monitoring. Integrating telemedicine into mental healthcare can enhance overall adherence rates, leading to improved management of mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"628-636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"107592696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Telerehabilitation for the treatment in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Francisco Jesús Villatoro-Luque, Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Eduardo Castro-Martín, Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231195091","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231195091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAlthough there is growth in the approach to telerehabilitation (TLRH) in different pathologies, research on TLRH for the management of low back pain is scarce and controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether a TLRH program is as effective as a clinical exercise program in improving pain and different functional variables in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP).MethodA single-blind, two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 68 individuals with chronic NLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TLRH group (TG) (<i>n</i> = 34) or the clinic group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 34). The TG received an exercise-based TLRH video and an educational program on the neurophysiology of pain. The CG received the same pain education and exercise program at the clinic facility supervised by a clinician. Both groups performed 2 weekly sessions for 8 weeks. Active movements of the lumbar spine, pain and range of motion, and kinesiophobia were assessed at baseline, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 3 months.ResultsStatistically significant differences for time-by-group interaction were identified in range of motion of right (<i>F</i> = 11.668; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and left (<i>F</i> = 4.219; <i>p</i> = 0.042) legs when knee extended test is performed; as well as in pain intensity when the same test (<i>F</i> = 5.176; <i>p</i> = 0.043). Moreover, higher pain level during flexion (<i>F</i> = 5.133; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and extension movements (<i>F</i> = 6.335; <i>p</i> = 0.003) in patients with bilateral pain location than those with unilateral or central pain location has been appreciated.ConclusionA TLRH rehabilitation program via mobile app is as effective as the same exercise program supervised in a clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"637-646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10119331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Specialists accessing specialty advice: Evaluating utilization, benefits, and impact of care of an e-consultation service.","authors":"Erin Keely, Sheena Guglani, Erik Mitchell, Claire Sethuram, Amir Afkham, Clare Liddy","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231211352","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231211352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe usual referral pathway is from a primary care provider (PCP) to a specialist; however, specialists also refer to and consult with other specialists. Electronic consultation (eConsult) allows clinicians to submit questions on behalf of patients to specialists to receive timely advice. Most eConsult studies in the past have examined questions asked from PCPs to specialists. This study investigates the utilization of specialists submitting clinical questions to other specialists through the Ontario eConsult Service and identifies use-case scenarios where specialist-to-specialist eConsult may be beneficial.MethodsA retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of eConsults submitted by specialists through the Ontario eConsult Service for 24 months (March 2019 to February 2021). Utilization data is collected automatically by the service, including specialty referred to, time billed, region, and results from a closeout survey which includes the referral outcome of the eConsult and the utility to the submitting clinician.Results4% (<i>n</i> = 3285) of all eConsults sent within the study period were specialist-to-specialist, with the others being sent by a PCP. The number of specialist-to-specialist eConsults grew 120% following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The top three specialties that submitted eConsults were pediatrics, internal medicine, and endocrinology. The top three specialties that specialists submitted to were dermatology, neurology, and hematology. A face-to-face referral was avoided in 69% of referrals.ConclusionEvaluating the utilization patterns of specialist-to-specialist eConsults allows us to better understand and expand the scope of eConsult services, which have traditionally been thought of as a workflow between a PCP and a specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"690-696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71488204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Remote guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: A pilot study.","authors":"Zhengming Xu, Li Zhao, Jing Cui, Jianyong Zheng, Zhichao Wang, Yi Cao, Yigang Qiu, Yixiong Huang, Jianhong Zhao, Lu Zhang, Dan Wang, Yu Chen","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231213111","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231213111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The safety and effectiveness of remote guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have not been fully appraised in controlled studies. We hereby presented the results of a study on remote guidance (vs on-site guidance) of PCI to explore its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Patients were recruited from those who received PCI procedures from January 2018 to June 2019 in a secondary hospital (Jincheng, Shanxi, China), in collaboration with a tertiary medical center (Beijing, China) approximately 680 km away. According to the type of guidance during the procedure, the patients were assigned to two groups: the remote guidance group and the on-site guidance group. Remote guidance was assisted with an advanced commercial telemedicine system. Interventional strategies, procedural success rate, peri-procedural complications, procedural duration, radiation doses, and the amount of contrast medium were compared between the two groups. A total of 352 patients were included in this study, with a total of 411 PCI procedures and 446 target lesions. The baseline clinical characteristics, as well as the distribution and characteristics of coronary artery lesions, did not differ significantly between the two groups. No significant differences were noticed in procedural success rate, peri-procedural complications, procedural duration, radiation dose, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the amount of contrast medium was slightly higher in the remote guidance group. The results of the present pilot study showed the feasibility of remotely guided PCI, with safety and effectiveness measures at acceptable levels comparable to the traditional on-site guidance. Randomized studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to further confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"715-720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92157142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Virtual agents among participants with methamphetamine use disorders: Acceptability and usability study.","authors":"Shuo Li, Yue Wang, Liyu Chen, Tianzhen Chen, Jiang Du, Hang Su, Haifeng Jiang, Qianying Wu, Lei Zhang, Jiayi Bao, Min Zhao","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231219039","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231219039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWhile the potential future role of virtual agents (VAs) in treating addiction is promising, participants' attitudes toward the use of VAs in psychotherapy remain insufficiently investigated. This lack of investigation could pose barriers to the adoption of VA-led psychotherapy for people with substance use disorders (SUD). This research aims to explore the acceptability and usability of VAs for people with methamphetamine use disorder.MethodsFollowing a single session of psychotherapy led by VAs through the Echo-app, a group of 49 individuals actively seeking treatment for current DSM-V substance dependence (with a mean age of 39.06 ± 8.02) completed self-administered questionnaires and participated in focus group interviews. These questionnaires aimed to investigate participants' preference regarding the type of psychotherapy and their willingness to engage in VA-led psychotherapy, taking into account their diverse psychological needs.ResultsQuantitative data were subjected to analysis through both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Interestingly, participants exhibited a significantly higher acceptability for traditional face-to-face psychotherapy compared to email-based psychotherapy (<i>p </i>= 0.042), but there was no statistically significant difference between their acceptance of traditional psychotherapy and VA-led psychotherapy (<i>p </i>= 0.059). The questionnaire outcomes indicated participants' willingness to engage in VA-led psychotherapy for purposes such as relapse prevention intervention, addressing emotional issues, managing somatic experiences, and facilitating social and family functional recovery. Furthermore, the participants' attitudes toward VA-led psychotherapy were predicted by factors including the need for anxiety-focused psychotherapy (<i>p </i>= 0.027; OR [95%CI] = 0.14[0.03,0.80]), the presence of chronic somatic diseases (<i>p</i> = 0.017; OR [95%CI] = 13.58[1.59,116.03]), and marital status (<i>p</i> = 0.031; OR [95%CI] = 5.02[1.16,21.79]).DiscussionThrough the interviews, the study uncovered the factors that either supported or hindered participants' experiences with VA-led psychotherapy, while also gathering suggestions for future improvements. This research highlights the willingness and practicality of individuals with SUD in embracing VA-led psychotherapy. The findings are anticipated to contribute to the refinement of VA-led tools to better align with the preferences and needs of the users.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"742-751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Attendance at remote versus in-person outpatient appointments in an NHS Trust.","authors":"Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Fiona Gaughran, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Nirandeep Rehill, Rosalind Raine, Azeem Majeed, Ceire Costelloe, Ana Luisa Neves, Thomas Beaney","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231216501","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1357633X231216501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWith the growing use of remote appointments within the National Health Service, there is a need to understand potential barriers of access to care for some patients. In this observational study, we examined missed appointments rates, comparing remote and in-person appointments among different patient groups.MethodsWe analysed adult outpatient appointments at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in Northwest London in 2021. Rates of missed appointments per patient were compared between remote versus in-person appointments using negative binomial regression models. Models were stratified by appointment type (first or a follow-up).ResultsThere were 874,659 outpatient appointments for 189,882 patients, 29.5% of whom missed at least one appointment. Missed rates were 12.5% for remote first appointments and 9.2% for in-person first appointments. Remote and in-person follow-up appointments were missed at similar rates (10.4% and 10.7%, respectively). For remote and in-person appointments, younger patients, residents of more deprived areas, and patients of Black, Mixed and 'other' ethnicities missed more appointments. Male patients missed more in-person appointments, particularly at younger ages, but gender differences were minimal for remote appointments. Patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) missed more first appointments, whether in-person or remote. In follow-up appointments, patients with LTCs missed more in-person appointments but fewer remote appointments.DiscussionRemote first appointments were missed more often than in-person first appointments, follow-up appointments had similar attendance rates for both modalities. Sociodemographic differences in outpatient appointment attendance were largely similar between in-person and remote appointments, indicating no widening of inequalities in attendance due to appointment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"721-731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095891/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}