Francisco Jesús Villatoro-Luque, Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Eduardo Castro-Martín, Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa
{"title":"Telerehabilitation for the treatment in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Francisco Jesús Villatoro-Luque, Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Eduardo Castro-Martín, Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231195091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAlthough there is growth in the approach to telerehabilitation (TLRH) in different pathologies, research on TLRH for the management of low back pain is scarce and controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether a TLRH program is as effective as a clinical exercise program in improving pain and different functional variables in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP).MethodA single-blind, two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 68 individuals with chronic NLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TLRH group (TG) (<i>n</i> = 34) or the clinic group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 34). The TG received an exercise-based TLRH video and an educational program on the neurophysiology of pain. The CG received the same pain education and exercise program at the clinic facility supervised by a clinician. Both groups performed 2 weekly sessions for 8 weeks. Active movements of the lumbar spine, pain and range of motion, and kinesiophobia were assessed at baseline, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 3 months.ResultsStatistically significant differences for time-by-group interaction were identified in range of motion of right (<i>F</i> = 11.668; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and left (<i>F</i> = 4.219; <i>p</i> = 0.042) legs when knee extended test is performed; as well as in pain intensity when the same test (<i>F</i> = 5.176; <i>p</i> = 0.043). Moreover, higher pain level during flexion (<i>F</i> = 5.133; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and extension movements (<i>F</i> = 6.335; <i>p</i> = 0.003) in patients with bilateral pain location than those with unilateral or central pain location has been appreciated.ConclusionA TLRH rehabilitation program via mobile app is as effective as the same exercise program supervised in a clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"637-646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231195091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionAlthough there is growth in the approach to telerehabilitation (TLRH) in different pathologies, research on TLRH for the management of low back pain is scarce and controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether a TLRH program is as effective as a clinical exercise program in improving pain and different functional variables in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP).MethodA single-blind, two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 68 individuals with chronic NLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TLRH group (TG) (n = 34) or the clinic group (CG) (n = 34). The TG received an exercise-based TLRH video and an educational program on the neurophysiology of pain. The CG received the same pain education and exercise program at the clinic facility supervised by a clinician. Both groups performed 2 weekly sessions for 8 weeks. Active movements of the lumbar spine, pain and range of motion, and kinesiophobia were assessed at baseline, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 3 months.ResultsStatistically significant differences for time-by-group interaction were identified in range of motion of right (F = 11.668; p = 0.001) and left (F = 4.219; p = 0.042) legs when knee extended test is performed; as well as in pain intensity when the same test (F = 5.176; p = 0.043). Moreover, higher pain level during flexion (F = 5.133; p = 0.009) and extension movements (F = 6.335; p = 0.003) in patients with bilateral pain location than those with unilateral or central pain location has been appreciated.ConclusionA TLRH rehabilitation program via mobile app is as effective as the same exercise program supervised in a clinic.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.