MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010005
Pauline Sabrier
{"title":"The Way We Divide Forms ’in Our Soul’: Conceived Parthood at Plato’s Sophist 250b8","authors":"Pauline Sabrier","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000What does Plato mean when he declares at Soph. 250b8 that Theaetetus is positing Being in his soul (ἐν τῇ ψυχῇ τιθείς) as a third something encompassing Change and Rest? Is he merely clarifying that the act of positing is a mental act? Or is he making a further point? This paper argues that the locution ‘in the soul’ plays a significant role in the passage in alerting to a contrast between the way Being and its relation to Change and Rest are intelligible to Theaetetus and the way Being really is and relates to those two other kinds. This interpretation is set against another interpretation, defended by Leigh, according to which the phrase should be understood as drawing a contrast between what is done by the agency of the soul and what is done by the agency of the body. The paper then explores the consequences of the proposed interpretation for our understanding of the broader context of the passage. In particular, it argues that the claim that Being is a third something encompassing Change and Rest is more problematic than critics have usually assumed. To account for Theaetetus’ depiction, it develops the notion of ‘conceived parthood’, which are part-whole relations posited by the mind for the needs of a philosophical enquiry.","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"110 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140088553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-35010011
F. Farina
{"title":"Gli eph’hemin e l’unidirezionalità degli abiti – una conciliazione possibile tra le Etiche di AristoteleThe eph’hemin and the Unidirectionality of Habits – One Possible Reconciliation between the Ethics of Aristotle","authors":"F. Farina","doi":"10.1163/24680974-35010011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-35010011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In the Eudemian Ethics Aristotle states that human beings are starting points of things that could be otherwise and that the eph’hemin are this kind of things. Famously, in the Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle endorses the thesis of habits’ unidirectionality, according to which the agent who already possesses moral habits, hexeis, will perform only actions consistent with the habits she possesses. Despite this apparent inconsistency, I aim to show that the two texts can be harmonized and that the Eudemian Ethics can actually provide a theoretical background for habits’ unidirectionality.","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"26 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140083163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010002
Arthur Oosthout, Sokratis-Athanasios Kiosoglou, Thibaut Lejeune
{"title":"Introduction: Part and Whole in Antiquity","authors":"Arthur Oosthout, Sokratis-Athanasios Kiosoglou, Thibaut Lejeune","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"122 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140089058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010003
Līva Rotkale
{"title":"Species and Genus as Mutual Parts in Aristotle: a Hylomorphic Account","authors":"Līva Rotkale","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000A genus contains its species, and the species implies its genus. Does it mean that the species is a part of the genus and also the genus is a part of the species? But how can they be part of each other without being identical? In the context of kinds, in what sense is ‘part’ applicable?\u0000We argue that for Aristotle, a species and its genus are mutual parts, standing in different parthood relations to each other, viz. the genus is a prior part of its species, while the species is a posterior part of its genus. Furthermore, we show that prior and posterior parthood concerning the genus and its species is grounded on the relations between matter and form in a matter-form compound.","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140283164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010004
Dániel Attila Kovács
{"title":"Plotinus on the Parthood and Agency of Individual Souls","authors":"Dániel Attila Kovács","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Plotinus criticizes the view that individual human souls are parts of the world-soul arguing that they would lack individual agency since their alleged actions would have to be attributed to the whole they are parts of (iii.1.4). He nevertheless holds that individual souls are parts of a larger whole, the so-called hypostasis soul, a soul that does not ensoul any body but encompasses and produces all individual souls including the world-soul (iv.3.4.14–21; iv.8.36–12; iv.9.5). In this paper, I ask whether Plotinus, in the face of his own arguments, can consistently attribute agency to individual souls and hold that they are parts of the hypostasis soul. I argue that Plotinus’ model of intelligible mereology (vi.2.20) allows individual souls to depend on the hypostasis soul as parts in a way that grounds their agency by providing them with the capacity for rational thought.","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"42 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140276469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010008
Robert Mayhew
{"title":"Peripatetic Philosophy in Context: Knowledge, Time, and Soul from Theophrastus to Cratippus. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, written by Francesco Verde","authors":"Robert Mayhew","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"213 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140281953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MéthexisPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1163/24680974-36010006
Chiara Martini
{"title":"A Functionalist Account of Epicurus’ Minima","authors":"Chiara Martini","doi":"10.1163/24680974-36010006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-36010006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Epicurus’ original version of atomism takes atoms to be physically indivisible but not completely unanalysable: each atom contains a finite number of minima. This paper explores the nature of the minima by focusing on a specific question: in which sense are the minima minimal? I do so by investigating the notions of parthood and divisibility into parts that are at play in paragraphs 56–59 of the Letter to Herodotus, where the theory of minima is introduced. By focusing on the analogy (noticed by Francesco Verde) between Epicurean minima and Aristotelian limits, I argue that the minima should be understood as the minimal realiser of the atom’s physical functions. This allows me to keep together two very plausible but apparently incompatible claims: (i) the minima are supposed to block the paradoxes of theoretical divisibility, but (ii) their existence and their indivisibility can only be justified in physical (rather than geometrical) terms.","PeriodicalId":499843,"journal":{"name":"Méthexis","volume":"20 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140277581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}