Andrew F. Fieldsend , Evelien Cronin , Eszter Varga , Szabolcs Biró , Elke Rogge
{"title":"Organisational Innovation Systems for multi-actor co-innovation in European agriculture, forestry and related sectors: Diversity and common attributes","authors":"Andrew F. Fieldsend , Evelien Cronin , Eszter Varga , Szabolcs Biró , Elke Rogge","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100335","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100335","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Innovation rests not only on discovery but also on cooperation and interactive learning. In agriculture, forestry and related sectors, multi-actor partnerships for ‘co-innovation’ occur in many forms, from international projects to informal ‘actor configurations’. Common attributes are that they include actors with ‘complementary forms of knowledge’ who collaborate in an innovation process, engage with a ‘larger periphery’ of stakeholders in the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) and are shaped by institutions. Using desk research and interviews, we reviewed, according to the Organisational Innovation Systems framework, the performance of 200 co-innovation partnerships from across Europe, selected for their involvement of various actors ‘all along the process’. Many of the reviewed partnerships were composed of actors that had previously worked together and most interviewees believed that no relevant actors had been excluded. In almost all cases, project targets and objectives were co-designed to a great or some extent, and the mechanisms applied to foster knowledge sharing between partners were considered to be very effective. Great importance was attached to communication beyond the partnership, not simply for dissemination but also for dialogue, and most interviewees evaluated the communication/outreach performance of their partnership very highly. Most partnerships received external funding, most did not use innovation brokers during the proposal writing process and two thirds had access to information they needed. We discuss the implications of these findings and question whether the AKIS concept as currently interpreted by many policy makers can adequately account for the regional differences encountered by co-innovation partnerships across Europe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100335","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88110161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julius J. Okello , Bruce Ochieng , Elmar Shulte-Geldermann
{"title":"Economic and psychosocial factors associated with management of bacteria wilt disease in smallholder potato farms: Evidence from Kenya","authors":"Julius J. Okello , Bruce Ochieng , Elmar Shulte-Geldermann","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100331","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100331","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Potato is a major food staple in the tropical highlands of Africa. However, its production is constrained by seed-borne diseases, with bacteria wilt (BW) being the most devastating and difficult to manage. Currently, there is no single e remedy for the disease. This paper uses Means-End Chain analysis to assess the psychosocial factors associated with the management of BW in potato production. It focuses on smallholder farmers in Central and Rift Valley regions of Kenya. The paper finds BW management is characterized by use of several practices, majority of which are ineffective in controlling the disease. They are, however, used mainly to increase yield, hence income and profits, and to achieve the personal values or life goals farmers aspire for. The paper concludes that BW management in smallholder potato farms is driven by both economic incentives (i.e., higher incomes and profits) and psychosocial factors. It discusses the implications of these findings for policy and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100331","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88737980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elisangela Domingues Vaz, Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes, João Augusto Rossi Borges
{"title":"Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos","authors":"Elisangela Domingues Vaz, Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes, João Augusto Rossi Borges","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brazil is one of the leading countries in production and exportation of grains. However, most grain production regions in Brazil do not have an adequate storage capacity, which result in losses for the grain supply chain. A possible solution to increase storage capacity is the adoption of on-farm silos. We used the Reasoned Action Approach as a framework to identify the impact of attitude, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control on farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos and to identify the most important beliefs underlying their intentions to adopt it. A survey was conducted with 170 farmers in Brazil. Data was analyzed by means of Partial-Least-Square Structural Equation Modeling and MIMIC models. Results showed that attitude was the main determinant of intention, followed by perceived behavioral control and injunctive norms. Results also showed that “Sell grains at higher price”, “Have independence in relation to grain storage firms”, and “Have control over grain classification” are the most important beliefs that drive attitude; “Bank” is the most important belief that drive perceived norm; and “Have easy access to silos”, “Prioritize other investments”, and “Need skilled workers” are the most important beliefs that drive perceived behavioral control. These results revealed important implications to design public and private interventions aimed to stimulate the adoption of on-farm silos.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75781252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Estimating crop yield supply responses to be used for market outlook models: Application to major developed and developing countries","authors":"Roel Jongeneel , Ana Rosa Gonzalez-Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100327","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100327","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The evolution of yields is one of the driving factors explaining crop supply growth. Part of this is explained by how yields react to prices, though there is a lot of uncertainty about the price-responsiveness of yields. Using information from various sources such as agronomy, economic theory and economic literature an in-depth assessment of yield price responsiveness is made. The result is used as a set of prior-information, which is subsequently taken into account to re-estimate yield price supply responses for 20 main crops in major producing developed and developing countries, using OLS and Mixed Estimation (ME) approaches. The outcomes indicate that price-responsiveness is usually low. Moreover, the ME results are different than the current estimates used in the OECD-FAO’s market outlook model, showing stronger differentiation among crops/countries. The Mixed Estimation is found useful to overcome typical problems encountered when estimating yield-price responsiveness, such as violations of economic theory, insignificance of estimated parameters and inconsistencies with agronomic knowledge regarding the size of the estimated responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100327","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87253486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carole A.K. Sanya , Flora Josiane Chadare , Menouwesso Harold Hounhouigan , Nicodème V. Fassinou Hotegni , Mechak A. Gbaguidi , Jean Eudes Dekpemadoha , Anita R. Linnemann , D. Joseph Hounhouigan
{"title":"Effects of plant density and fertilizer formula on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of pasteurized juice from Perolera sugarloaf pineapples grown in the long rainy season","authors":"Carole A.K. Sanya , Flora Josiane Chadare , Menouwesso Harold Hounhouigan , Nicodème V. Fassinou Hotegni , Mechak A. Gbaguidi , Jean Eudes Dekpemadoha , Anita R. Linnemann , D. Joseph Hounhouigan","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100320","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100320","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High quality products can be produced only from high quality raw materials. The best agricultural practices that lead to pineapple fruits of desirable quality were investigated in the present study, focusing on the quality of the derived pasteurized juices. Physicochemical characteristics and sensory quality of the juices were determined in relation to planting density and fertilizer formulation, namely the K<sub>2</sub>O:N ratio. Three planting densities (D1: 54 400 plants/ha, D2: 66 600 plants/ha and D3: 74 000 plants/ha) and three K<sub>2</sub>O:N ratios (E1: 0.37, E2: 1.0 and E3: 2.0) were applied in nine treatments. Fruits were harvested and processed into juice following a standardized process. Pasteurization was applied after bottling, at 85 °C for 15 min. Juices’ pH, total soluble solids, color and density were determined. Sensory profiles were established by 14 trained panelists using the Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) method and their acceptability was evaluated. Results showed that the lower the planting density, the less yellow the pasteurized juice. The K<sub>2</sub>O:N ratio increased the juices’ degrees Brix from 13.1 to 14.4 and the yellow color. Pineapple fruits produced at a density of 54 400 plants/ha with a K<sub>2</sub>O:N ratio of 1.0 (D1E2) yielded the most sweet, least acid and pasteurized juice most liked by consumers, supported by high values of degree Brix and pH. Juices with the closest similar sensory appreciation were those obtained from treatments D3E2 and D3E1. Pineapple farmers that furnish their products to juice processors should adopt one of the best combinations stated in this study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100320","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81457126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simone van der Burg, Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt, Sjaak Wolfert
{"title":"Ethics of smart farming: Current questions and directions for responsible innovation towards the future","authors":"Simone van der Burg, Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt, Sjaak Wolfert","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sensors, drones, weather satellites and robots are examples of technologies that make farming ‘smart’. In this article we present the results of our review of the literature that concerns the ethical challenges that smart farming raises. Our reading suggests that current ethical discussion about smart farming circles around three themes: (1) data ownership and access, (2) distribution of power and (3) impacts on human life and society. Discussions that fall under these themes have however not yet reached a satisfying conclusion, as there seem to be different ideas at work in the background regarding the purpose and function of digital farms in society. The pros and cons of these rivalling ideas are rarely foregrounded in the discussion. We suggest that future research should focus first on the content of these goals, especially on the content of societal and commercial goals and whether and how they can be combined in differing contexts. This will offer a lead to think about what data ought to be shared with whom, to set preconditions for trust between stakeholders and –eventually- develop appropriate guidelines and codes of conduct for future farming digitalization trajectories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.01.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87856366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming","authors":"Kelly Bronson","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article extends social science research on big data and data platforms through a focus on agriculture, which has received relatively less attention than other sectors like health. In this paper, I use a responsible innovation framework to move attention to the social and ethical dimensions of big data “upstream,” to decision-making in the very selection of agricultural data and the building of its infrastructures. I draw on original empirical material from qualitative interviews with North American designers and engineers to make visible and analyze the normative aspects of their technical decisions. Social actors shaping innovation hold a narrow set of values about good farming and good technology and their data selection choices privilege large-scale and commodity crop farmers by focusing on agronomic crop data and data mapping unusable to organic growers. Enabling engagement among a wide variety of food system actors, not just already powerful ones, and attending to a greater diversity of values would be essential to underpin a responsible digital agricultural transition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82603864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simon J. Fielke , Robert Garrard , Emma Jakku , Aysha Fleming , Leanne Wiseman , Bruce M. Taylor
{"title":"Conceptualising the DAIS: Implications of the ‘Digitalisation of Agricultural Innovation Systems’ on technology and policy at multiple levels","authors":"Simon J. Fielke , Robert Garrard , Emma Jakku , Aysha Fleming , Leanne Wiseman , Bruce M. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As digitalisation transforms agriculture, the implications of cumulative innovation processes are essential to consider in order to mitigate risk and capitalise on opportunities. One project that involves imagining the future of the sector and aims to develop the necessary tools and infrastructure is the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Digiscape Future Science Platform (FSP). This paper explores the policy framework encompassing these technologies and elucidates considerations for future governance in Australia and beyond. Conceptually, we draw on Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) theorisation in the context of implications of digital technological development on policy. Methodologically, we utilise multi-level exploratory interviews with Digiscape FSP and prawn aquaculture value chain stakeholders. We argue society is at a critical point in time when the implications of digital agriculture need to be considered at broader regime and landscape levels. Questions around data privacy and ownership are prevalent in agricultural settings, although appropriate institutional guidance is lacking. Three propositions are made as a result of the analysis of scoping research involving innovation community stakeholders. We suggest that agricultural industries stand to benefit from the ‘Digitalisation of Agricultural Innovation Systems’ <em>ex ante</em> socio-technical transition, what we introduce as the DAIS, if forums for discussion and associated technological policy are enacted with emphasis placed on the underlying values of society-technology interaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91266105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea Knierim , Maria Kernecker , Klaus Erdle , Teresa Kraus , Friederike Borges , Angelika Wurbs
{"title":"Smart farming technology innovations – Insights and reflections from the German Smart-AKIS hub","authors":"Andrea Knierim , Maria Kernecker , Klaus Erdle , Teresa Kraus , Friederike Borges , Angelika Wurbs","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100314","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100314","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digitalisation in agriculture is considered the fourth revolution in farming, which is expressed by a broad range of available digital technologies and data applications. Politicians and experts assume that smart farming technologies (SFT) have a strong potential to enhance economic performance of farming and will contribute to agricultural sustainability as they may increase precision of inputs to crops and soils based on site-specific needs, and link these aspects to farm management systems. This paper explores farmers' and other stakeholders’ perceptions and attitudes towards SFT in Germany with a multi-actor approach. Quantitative and qualitative data show that while there are generally positive attitudes, farmers are less enthusiastic with regard to expected positive effects of SFT for the environment. Also, there is still a number of adoption barriers on the technology level as well as due to an unfavorable institutional and infrastructural environment. Although a multi-actor approach was practiced, close cooperation of practitioners with developers were not frequently observed nor could they be easily supported through action-research. Notwithstanding, through the multi-actor approach, a comprehensive situational picture of SFT appraisal was composed and, a general raise of awareness among the respective AKIS actors generated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100314","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79109541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The political robot – The structural consequences of automated milking systems (AMS) in Norway","authors":"Jostein Vik , Egil Petter Stræte , Bjørn Gunnar Hansen , Torfinn Nærland","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100305","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.100305","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, the aim is to explore how social aspects of the adoption and expansion of milking robots in Norwegian dairy farming are related to the political and structural changes in the sector. To explore the relationship between the implementation of automated milking systems (AMS) and structural developments, we used a qualitative methodology building on data from interviews with farmers, policy documents, statistics, and secondary literature. The structural change in the Norwegian dairy sector was substantial between 2000 and 2018. The average number of cows on each farm increased from 14.4 to 27.9, while the number of farms decreased from around 21,000 to less than 9,000. More than 47 percent of the milk produced in Norway now comes from a dairy farm with an AMS, and this percentage is rapidly increasing. We argue that the structural developments in milk production in Norway are neither politically nor economically driven, but are mainly an unintended consequence of farmers’ aggregated investments in AMS – which are supposed to increase farmers’ everyday quality of life – and reluctant regulatory changes to make investments in AMS structurally and economically viable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100305","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77251810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}