P. Pablo Ferrer-Gallego, Inmaculada Ferrando-Pardo, Maja Lazarević
{"title":"(3019) Proposal to conserve the name Hypericum olympicum (Hypericaceae) with a conserved type","authors":"P. Pablo Ferrer-Gallego, Inmaculada Ferrando-Pardo, Maja Lazarević","doi":"10.1002/tax.13152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13152","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3019) <b><i>Hypericum olympicum</i></b> L., Sp. Pl.: 784. 1 Mai 1753 [Angiosp.: <i>Guttif</i>. / <i>Hyperic</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: Herb. Clifford: 380, <i>Hypericum</i> No. 8 (BM barcode BM000646814), typ. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p><i>Hypericum olympicum</i> L. (Sp. Pl.: 784. 1753) (<i>H</i>. sect. <i>Olympia</i> (Spach) Nyman) is a small perennial herb distributed in the Balkan Peninsula (southeastern Serbia, Macedonia, Albania, Bulgaria, Greece [excluding Crete and western Aegean islands] and northwestern Turkey [Jordanov & Kožukharov in Jordanov, Fl. R. P. Bulg. 4: 235, t. 44, fig. 1. 1970; Greuter & al. in Med.-Checklist 3: 270. 1986; Robson & Strid in Strid, Mtn. Fl. Greece 1: 597, fig. 35. 1986; Qosja & al., Fl. Shquip. 2: 296, fig. 550. 1992; Zlatković in Stevanović & Niketić, Fl. Serbia 3: 311–313, 317, t. 53, fig. 1. 2022; POWO, 2023: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:433682-1]). <i>Hypericum olympicum</i> is a variable species, but the variation, though partly geographical, is more or less continuous. In order to make this variation comprehensible, the species was divided into five forms, which remain distinct in cultivation (Robson in Plantsman 1: 193–200. 1980, in Phytotaxa 4: 26. 2010). Moreover, there are several ornamental cultivars of <i>H</i>. <i>olympicum</i> (e.g., ‘Citrinum’, ‘Sulphureum’, ‘Variegatum’) (see https://ecuador.inaturalist.org/taxa/567176-Hypericum-olympicum#cite_note-30).</p>\u0000<p>Aerial parts of the plant are used in folk medicine for stomach ache, inflamed wounds and cuts (Tuzlacı & al. in Fitoterapia 72: 323–343. 2001), thus its essential oil composition (Gudžić & al. in Flavour Fragr. J. 16: 201–203. 2001; Smelcerovic & al. in Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35: 99–113. 2007) and antimicrobial properties have been frequently investigated (Ilieva & al. in Plants (Switzerland) 12: 1500. 2023; Kirci & al. in J. Res. Pharm. 27: 2153–2159. 2023).</p>\u0000<p>Linnaeus (l.c.) described <i>Hypericum olympicum</i> providing a short diagnosis “HYPERICUM floribus trigynis, calycibus acutis, staminibus corolla brevioribus, caule fruticoso” taken from Linnaeus (Hort. Cliff.: 380. 1738) and Van Royen (Fl. Leyd. Prodr.: 473 [not “374”]. 1740), followed by two synonyms: (1) “Hypericum montis olympi” cited from Wheeler [Sir George Wheler 1651–1724] (A Journey into Greece: 222. 1682) and Dillenius (Hort. Eltham.: 182, t. 151, fig. 183. 1732); and (2) “Ascyrum magno flore” cited from Bauhin (Prodr.: 130. 1620; Pinax: 280. 1623), and finally the reference “<i>Burs. XVI</i>: 25”. The protologue also included information about the origin of the species, “<i>Habitat in</i> Pyrenaeis, Olympo”. The references quoted by Linnaeus (Wheeler, l.c.: 221, lib. III, fig. III; Dillenius, l.c.: t. 151, fig. 183) include the illustrations “Hypericon montis Oly[m]pii foliis hursutis” (image available at https://www.alamy.com/stock-image-hypericon-montis-olympi-wheler-george-1682-16333079","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140005177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Linda in Arcadia, Teuvo Ahti, Renato Benesperi, Guillermo Amo de Paz, Pradeep K. Divakar, David L. Hawksworth
{"title":"(3013) Proposal to conserve the name Lichen pullus Schreb. (Parmelia pulla, Xanthoparmelia pulla) against L. pullus Neck. (Parmeliaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) with a conserved type","authors":"Linda in Arcadia, Teuvo Ahti, Renato Benesperi, Guillermo Amo de Paz, Pradeep K. Divakar, David L. Hawksworth","doi":"10.1002/tax.13153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13153","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3013) <b><i>Lichen pullus</i></b> Schreb., Spic. Fl. Lips.: 131. 9 Jul–25 Oct 1771, nom. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: Norway, Østfold, Hvaler, Spjærøy, Spjærholmen, W side, on rock in coastal heath, 59.0617N, 10.9038E, alt. 15 m, 1 Aug 2022, <i>E. Timdal</i> (O No. L-229346; isotypus: MAF No. Lich 25274), typ. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>(H) <i>Lichen pullus</i> Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 510. 1768, nom. rej. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: non designatus.</p>\u0000<p>The well-established name <i>Xanthoparmelia pulla</i> (Schreb.) O. Blanco & al. (or sometimes <i>Neofuscelia pulla</i> (Schreb.) Essl.) has been used to refer to a common, brown, foliose saxicolous lichen. The basionym had, however, long been considered to be <i>Parmelia pulla</i> Ach. (Syn. Meth. Lich.: 206. 1814), and so the type had been assumed to be an Acharian collection. A specimen of <i>Parmelia pulla</i> in H-ACH 1420D (= H9502152) conforming to current usage was therefore designated as lectotype by Esslinger & Ahti (in Revista Fac. Ci. Univ. Lisboa, ser. 2, C, Ci. Nat. 17: 728 & fig. 1. [“1973”] 1975). However, one of us (L.A.) pointed out that this was incorrect, as Acharius's species name was intended as a new combination based on <i>Lichen pullus</i> Schreb. (Spic. Fl. Lips.: 131. 1771) as that name was listed as a synonym. It is therefore necessary to address the status and typification of the intended basionym to fix the application of Acharius's name.</p>\u0000<p>The situation is complicated as Schreber's name is a later homonym of <i>Lichen pullus</i> Neck. (Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 510. 1768), a corticolous and not a saxicolous brown parmelioid species. The protologues of both these names include Dillenius (Hist. Musc.: 182, t. 24, fig. 77. 1742 [<i>sic</i> 1741, fide Henrey, Brit. Bot. Hort. Lit. 2: 271. 1975]), but we do not consider them isonyms because the texts make clear they were referring to species of different substrata and so should be typified accordingly. Figure 77 shows three lichens, A, B and C, but on page 182 Dillenius cited only A and B. Crombie (in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 17: 572. 1880) studied the Dillenian collections, and stated that A was from the species now known as <i>Melanohalea olivacea</i> (L.) O. Blanco & al., and B from that now known as <i>Melanelixia fuliginosa</i> (Fr. ex Duby) O. Blanco & al. We examined high-resolution digital images of these collections and have no reason to disagree with Crombie's opinion for B, but A appears to have apothecia with papillate thalline exciples and so may be <i>Melanohalea exasperata</i> (De Not.) O. Blanco & al., rather than <i>M. olivacea</i>. Both <i>M. exasperata</i> and <i>M. olivacea</i> are almost always corticolous and fertile, whereas <i>Melanelixia fuliginosa</i> is only exceptionally corticolous and sterile with abundant isidia. Necker's lichen was therefore most likely a corticolous <i>Melanohalea</i> species, but we choose not to lectotypify it here by Dillenius's fig. 77A as we have not investigat","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140004526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"(3015) Proposal to reject the name Arum pentaphyllum (Arisaema pentaphyllum) (Araceae)","authors":"Duilio Iamonico, Manudev Kambiyelummal Madhavan","doi":"10.1002/tax.13150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13150","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3015) <b><i>Arum pentaphyllum</i></b> L., Sp. Pl.: 964. 1 Mai 1753 (Angiosp.: <i>Ar</i>.), nom. utique rej. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: non designatus.</p>\u0000<p>Linnaeus, in <i>Species plantarum</i> (1753: 964–967), published 22 names under <i>Arum</i> L., among which only one (<i>A. maculatum</i> L.) is currently accepted in this genus, while the other 21 names are now treated in 13 different genera (see, e.g., Jarvis, Order out of Chaos: 318–320. 2007; The Natural History Museum, Linnaean Plant Names (from The Linnaean Plant Name Typification Project) [Dataset resource], https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/the-linnaean-plant-name-typification-project/resource/ec9fffe8-f7f4-4dcd-9471-641c4922d956, accessed 8 Feb 2024). One of these names, <i>A. pentaphyllum</i> L. (l.c.: 964–965) was described from India and appears still to be untypified.</p>\u0000<p>The protologue of <i>Arum pentaphyllum</i> (Linnaeus, l.c.) consists of a very short diagnosis (“ARUM acaule, foliis quinatis”) and two synonyms cited from Morison (“Arum pentaphyllum indicum. <i>Moris. hist</i>. [Pl. Hist. Univ.] 3. <i>p</i>. 540 [549]. <i>s</i>. 13. <i>t</i>. 5. <i>f</i>. 27.” [1699]) and Zanoni (“Romphal planta indiae orientalis. <i>Zan. hist</i>. [Istoria Botanica] 205. <i>fig</i>. [LXXVIII, preceding p. 205]” [1675]); the provenance was also reported (“<i>Habitat in</i> India”). Both Morison (l.c. 1699: sect. 13, t. 5, fig. 27) and Zanoni (l.c. 1675: fig. LXXVIII: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5325109245&seq=381) published almost identical illustrations, which are original material for the Linnaean name. No original specimens have been located in the Linnaean and Linnaean-linked herbaria. Therefore, the two illustrations are the only extant original material. Both match the Linnaean diagnosis in depicting a plant without stem and with leaves 5-palmate (“foliis quinatis”); both illustrations also include the spadix but no floral details are represented there.</p>\u0000<p>In accordance with the treatments of Schott (in Schott & Endlicher, Melet. Bot.: 17. 1832) and Blume (Rumphia 1: 109. 1836), Jarvis (l.c.: 319) considered <i>Arum pentaphyllum</i> to be <i>Arisaema pentaphyllum</i> (L.) Schott (l.c.). Nevertheless, this name has not been otherwise accepted in any botanical publication in over a century, and in fact the illustration and Zanoni's (l.c.: 170) associated description clearly demonstrate that the name cannot be applied to any member of the tribe <i>Arisaemateae</i> Nakai to which the genus <i>Arisaema</i> belongs, because the illustrated spathe appears to be constricted with a connate tube and a gaping and erect blade, while according to Mayo & al. (Gen. Araceae: 268. 1997; in Kubitzki, Fam. Gen. Vasc. Pl.: 268–272. 1998) the spathe tube is cylindric with blade fornicate in tribe <i>Arisaemateae</i>.</p>\u0000<p>Furthermore, there are four characters that suggest the plant cannot belong to <i>Arisaema</i> itself (see, e.g., Mayo & Gilbert in Kew Bull. 41: 261–278.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140004515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unearthing the identity, taxonomy and nomenclature of the enigmatic Marchantiopsis stoloniscyphula (Marchantiophyta, Marchantiaceae) from China","authors":"Tian-Xiong Zheng, Yong Hu, Wei Li, Xue-Dong Li","doi":"10.1002/tax.13146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13146","url":null,"abstract":"Owing to a combination of reportedly unique morphological characters and an unlocatable type specimen, <i>Marchantiopsis stoloniscyphula</i> has been regarded as an enigmatic species in Marchantiaceae since its description, and all subsequent taxonomic treatments of this species were made without examination of the type. We located the original material of <i>M. stoloniscyphula</i> which was included as an admixture within the holotype of <i>Wiesnerella fasciaria</i> deposited in IFP. Our morphological examination found that <i>M. stoloniscyphula</i> and <i>W. fasciaria</i> are conspecific with <i>Marchantia papillata</i> subsp. <i>grossibarba</i> and <i>Sandea japonica</i>, respectively. The nomenclature of <i>Marchantiopsis</i> and <i>M. stoloniscyphula</i> are discussed. Lectotypes for <i>M. stoloniscyphula</i> and <i>W. fasciaria</i> are also designated.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140004414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Iván A. Valdespino, Petra Korall, Stina Weststrand, Christian A. López, Jun-Yong Tang, Alexander Shalimov, Xian-Chun Zhang
{"title":"Rebuttal to “(2943) Proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type”: An unwarranted and disruptive idea","authors":"Iván A. Valdespino, Petra Korall, Stina Weststrand, Christian A. López, Jun-Yong Tang, Alexander Shalimov, Xian-Chun Zhang","doi":"10.1002/tax.13145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13145","url":null,"abstract":"A rebuttal to the proposal to conserve <i>Selaginella</i>, nom. cons., with a conserved type is submitted. We further discuss why this proposal is unwarranted and disruptive to nomenclatural stability as is the intention to split <i>Selaginella</i> since potentially segregated genera fail to reconcile monophyly and taxonomic diagnosability. Accordingly, we recommend the rejection of the Proposal (2943) and not to follow the dismembering of <i>Selaginella</i>.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139987612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P. Pablo Ferrer‐Gallego, Wesley M. Knapp, Aaron J. Floden, Gerry Moore
{"title":"(3009) Proposal to conserve the name Trillium erectum (Melanthiaceae: Parideae) with a conserved type","authors":"P. Pablo Ferrer‐Gallego, Wesley M. Knapp, Aaron J. Floden, Gerry Moore","doi":"10.1002/tax.13117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13117","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3009) <b><i>Trillium erectum</i></b> L., Sp. Pl.: 340. 1 Mai 1753 [Angiosp.: <i>Lil</i>. / <i>Melanth</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: United States, W. North Carolina, Henderson Co., shady woods, base of Mt. Pisgah, 8 Mai 1897, <i>Biltmore Herbarium 1135c</i> (MO No. 147310 [barcode MO-3717726]; isotypi: NCU barcode NCU00086525, NY barcodes NY02684139 & NY02684140, US No. 331198 [barcode 03929343]), typ. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p><i>Trillium</i> L. (<i>Melanthiaceae</i>: <i>Parideae</i>) consists of long-lived perennial herbs with characteristic rhizomes and is made up of about 50 species worldwide with concentrations in eastern and western North America and eastern Asia (Gates in Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 4: 43–92. 1917; Haga in Jap. J. Genet. 18: 168–171. 1942; Berg in Skr. Norske Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo, Mat.-Natkurvidensk. Kl. 1958(1): 1–36. 1958; Osaloo & al. in J. Pl. Res. 112: 35–49. 1999; Case & Case, Trilliums. 1997; Broyles & al. in Amer. J. Bot. 100: 1155–1161. 2013; Lampley & al. in Phytotaxa 552: 278–286. 2022; Meredith & al., Conserv. Status Trillium N. America. 2022). <i>Trillium erectum</i> L. is widely collected for the medicinal plant trade (see Yokosuka & Mimaki in Phytochemistry 69: 2724–2730. 2008; Hayes & al. in Phytochemistry 70: 105–113. 2009; Ur Rahman & al. in Molecules 22: 2156. 2017). The species is common in the understory of eastern North American forests and is found from southern New Brunswick, westward across southern Ontario to the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, throughout the upper Midwest and northeastern United States and south through the southern Appalachians (Case & Case in Bull. Amer. Rock Gard. Soc. 51: 162–168. 1993, l.c. 1997; Case in FNA Ed. Comm., Fl. N. Amer. N. Mexico 26: 90–117. 2002; Griffin & Barrett in Canad. J. Bot. 82: 316–321. 2004; USDA Plants Database: available at https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/home/plantProfile?symbol=TRER3).</p>\u0000<p>Linnaeus (Sp. Pl.: 340. 1753) described <i>Trillium erectum</i> providing the short diagnosis “TRILLIUM flore pedunculato erecto”, and listed four synonyms: (1) “Paris foliis ternis, flore pedunculato erecto” cited from Linnaeus (Amoen. Acad. 1: 154. 1749); (2) “Solanum triphyllum brasilianum” cited from Bauhin (Prodr.: 91. 1620; Pinax: 167. 1623) and with the annotation “<i>Burs</i>. <i>IX</i>: 12”; (3) “Solanum triphyllum canadense” cited from Cornut (Canad. Pl.: 166, t. 167. 1635); and (4) “Solano congener triphyllum canadense” cited from Morison (Pl. Hist. Univ. 3: 532, sect. 13, t. 3, fig. 7. 1699). The protologue includes as the geographical locality “<i>Habitat in Virginia</i>”. Both the synonyms from Cornut (l.c.) and Morison (l.c.) include illustrations that are, therefore, original material for the name <i>Trillium erectum</i>.</p>\u0000<p>Reveal (in Phytologia 72: 2. 1992) designated as the lectotype the illustration “Solanum triphyllum Canadense” published by Cornut (l.c.: t. 167), and this lectotypification was ","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139947991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Synopsis of Proposals on Nomenclature – Madrid 2024: A review of the proposals to amend the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants submitted to the XX International Botanical Congress","authors":"Nicholas J. Turland, John H. Wiersema","doi":"10.1002/tax.13114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13114","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> NOTICE</h2>\u0000<p>Individual members of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) are entitled to participate in the preliminary guiding vote (so-called “mail vote”) on proposals to amend the <i>International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants</i> (hereafter “<i>Code</i>”; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) submitted to the XX International Botanical Congress, Madrid, 2024, as stated in Div. III Prov. 2.5 of the <i>Code</i>. Authors of these proposals and members of the nine Permanent Nomenclature Committees (see Div. III Prov. 7.1) are also entitled to vote, but no institutional votes (Div. III Prov. 3) are allowed. The IAPT office is sending a ballot (voting form) by email to those IAPT members who have email addresses on file, the authors for correspondence of the proposals, and the secretaries of the Permanent Nomenclature Committees. A printed copy of the ballot is being sent to IAPT members who have no email address on file. If you are entitled to vote but do not receive a ballot, you may request an electronic or printed copy from the IAPT office at the following address. An electronic copy of the ballot should be filled out, saved, and sent by email to the IAPT office at office@iapt-taxon.org. Alternatively, a printed copy may be filled out and sent by airmail to: IAPT office, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia. All ballots must be received no later than 31 May 2024, so that they may be included in the tabulation to be made available to members of the Nomenclature Section of the Congress.</p>\u0000<p>The sessions of the Nomenclature Section, which will take definitive action on the proposals, will be held in the Villanueva Pavilion, Real Jardín Botánico, Plaza de Murillo 2, Madrid 28014, Spain, from Monday, 15 July 2024 (beginning at 08:30 hours) to Friday, 19 July 2024 (see https://ibcmadrid2024.com/?seccion=nomenclature&subSeccion=nomenclature).</p>\u0000<p>Each person registered for at least one full day of the Congress is entitled to register as a member of the Nomenclature Section. Registration for the Congress should be done in advance (see https://ibcmadrid2024.com/index.php?seccion=registrationArea&subSeccion=registrationInfo); the confirmation received will be the evidence of eligibility for Nomenclature Section registration, which will start during a welcome reception on Sunday, 14 July, at 17:00–20:00 hours in the Villanueva Pavilion. Nomenclature Section registration will continue on Monday, 15 July beginning at 08:00 hours in the Villanueva Pavilion.</p>\u0000<p>Each registered member of the Nomenclature Section is entitled to one personal vote in the sessions (Div. III Prov. 5.9). Personal votes can neither be transferred nor accumulated; one person never receives more than one personal vote. A member of the Nomenclature Section may be the official delegate of one or more institutions, thereby carrying institutio","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139948084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcelo Simon, Tania Moura, Domingos Cardoso, Patrick Herendeen
{"title":"Eighth International Legume Conference, Pirenópolis, Brazil, August 2023","authors":"Marcelo Simon, Tania Moura, Domingos Cardoso, Patrick Herendeen","doi":"10.1002/tax.13111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13111","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 8th International Legume Conference (8ILC, www.8ilc.com) took place from 6th to 11th August 2023 in Pirenópolis, Brazil, one of the most charming towns in the heart of the savanna landscapes of the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. The ILC is a series of international conferences focused on the legume family. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including but not limited to systematics, evolution, biogeography, morphology, ecology, biological nitrogen fixation, and genomics. Although this event was inaugurated in 1978, it does not adhere to a set periodic schedule; in recent years, however, it has been convened approximately every five years. For the first time, the ILC was held in Brazil, a country renowned for its extraordinary biological and cultural diversity, and home to a vibrant community of legume researchers. The International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT), reaffirming its commitment to fostering global taxonomy and systematics, was among the 8ILC sponsors.</p>\u0000<p>Since its inception, the ILC has firmly established itself as a prominent international meeting, attracting a diverse and extensive participation of researchers from various countries and continents, as well as a remarkable presence of students. By fostering global collaboration among researchers, well exemplified by the formation of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG), the ILC is a welcoming environment in which new scientifically exciting ideas and advances in the legume family arise. For example, the 6ILC in 2013 in Johannesburg, South Africa, set the stage for establishing the new phylogeny-based subfamily-level classification of the Leguminosae. The extensive discussions on the new legume classification that emerged during the 6ILC were the basis for the publication of two papers in <i>Taxon</i> in 2013 and 2017, under the auspices of the LPWG: (1) a review paper discussing the progress made to date in the molecular systematics and the need for a revised classification of the family (LPWG, 2013: https://doi.org/10.12705/622.8), and (2) the new subfamily-level classification (LPWG, 2017: https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3). Since its publication in early 2017, the LPWG's new classification of legumes at the subfamily level has become successful not only in the legume community. Its impact across plant science is demonstrated by the fact that it has already reached the landmark of becoming the second-most cited paper ever published in <i>Taxon</i>.</p>\u0000<p>The 8ILC in Pirenópolis was centered around the theme of “Integrating Knowledge on the Legume Family”. At the Opening Ceremony on 6th August, Marcelo Simon (Chairperson of the 8ILC) addressed the conference by welcoming all delegates. Then, Professor Fabio Scarano (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) delivered the opening keynote talk “Legumes and futures: Dialogues between different ways of knowing”.</p>\u0000<p>The global legume community was well represented, with 147 participants hailing from 18 countries,","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139953303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"(3008) Proposal to conserve the name Philodendron chanchamayense (Araceae) with that spelling","authors":"Michael H. Grayum","doi":"10.1002/tax.13118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3008) <b><i>Philodendron chanchamayense</i></b> Engl. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 19 Sep 1905 (‘<i>chinchamayense</i>’) [Angiosp.: <i>Ar</i>.], orth. cons. prop.</p>\u0000<p>Typus: Peru, Dep. Junín, Prov. Tarma, La Merced im Chanchamayo-Thal, lichter Wald, 1000 m, Dec 1902, <i>Weberbauer 1864</i> (B).</p>\u0000<p>The binomial referenced in the title of this proposal has long been accepted for a species of <i>Philodendron</i> subg. <i>Pteromischum</i> (Schott) Mayo, widespread in the western portion of the Amazon basin in South America, and distinctive morphologically by virtue of its relatively short-petiolate and narrow leaves with conspicuous (at least in dried material) blackish resin canals. The correct spelling of its epithet, however, has been a bone of contention. The name <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> (with that spelling) was validated by Adolf Engler (in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 125. 1905) based on a single specimen collected three years previously by his countryman August Weberbauer “im Chanchamoyo-Tal” (as cited by Engler), Peru. Although Engler did not specify the etymology of his epithet in an explicit manner, he must certainly have based it on the type locality, orthography notwithstanding. Engler's usage of two different spellings is prima facie evidence of an orthographical (if not a typographical) error, because both cannot be correct. In fact, as it turns out, both versions are erroneous: the Peruvian place-name (referring to a river, a town, a district, and a province) on which the epithet of this species must have been based is correctly spelled “Chanchamayo”, and was so spelled even in Engler's time (“Chanchamayo-Thal” is handwritten quite legibly on the label of Weberbauer's type specimen). The Chanchamayo River valley has attained wide repute even outside Peru as a premier coffee-growing region. I have been unable to find any evidence that the spellings “Chinchamayo” or “Chanchamoyo” have ever been used by anyone other than Engler (although “Chanchamayu”, a historic Quechua spelling, persists on a minor scale).</p>\u0000<p>The <i>Code</i> (Art. 60.1; Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) allows for “the correction of typographical or orthographical errors”, one or the other of which <i>Philodendron chinchamayense</i> is a clear example. According to Art. 60.3, “The liberty of correcting a name is to be used with reserve, especially if the change affects the first syllable and, above all, the first letter of the name”; nevertheless, several conflicting examples are condoned, e.g., those of <i>Agaricus rhacodes</i> Vittad. (Art. 60 Ex. 2), <i>Globba trachycarpa</i> Baker (Ex. 3), and <i>Gluta renghas</i> L. (Ex. 6). As far as I have been able to establish, the first author to correct Engler's <i>P. chinchamayense</i> to <i>P. chanchamayense</i> was Weberbauer himself (in Engler & Drude, Veg. Erde 12: 282. 1911), who did so without comment in an enumeration of plant species from the “Chanchamayo-Tal”. Shortly thereafter, ho","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139956679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}