Biosemiotics最新文献_第6页

The Landscape of Fear as a Safety Eco-Field: Experimental Evidence. 恐惧景观作为安全生态场:实验证据。

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Biosemiotics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12304-023-09522-1

Almo Farina, Philip James

{"title":"The Landscape of Fear as a Safety Eco-Field: Experimental Evidence.","authors":"Almo Farina, Philip James","doi":"10.1007/s12304-023-09522-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09522-1","url":null,"abstract":"In a development of the ecosemiotic vivo-scape concept, a 'safety eco-field' is proposed as a model of a species response to the safety of its environment. The safety eco-field is based on the ecosemiotic approach which considers environmental safety as a resource sought and chosen by individuals to counter predatory pressure. To test the relative safety of different locations within a landscape, 66 bird feeders (BF) were deployed in a regular 15 × 15 m grid in a rural area, surrounded by shrubs, small trees, hedgerows, and buildings. On each of 48 days in November 2021 and February and March 2022, dried mealworms were placed on each BF and counts of larvae at each BF were made at noon and dusk. The European robin (Erithacus rubecula) and the great tit (Parus major) were the most regular visitors to the BFs. Land cover at each BF was recorded. Bird behaviour at the BFs was noted from direct video recordings of the birds at nine selected BFs, totalling 32 daily sessions in March. The different behaviours of the European robin and the great tit were observable. The safety eco-field changed according to the month and the time of day. The distance of the BF from the woodland edges seemed to be important only in the morning. In the afternoon, BFs that were more distant from the woodland edges received the highest number of visits. Weather conditions were found to influence the number of mealworms removed, but this requires further investigation. A significant relationship between land cover and the number of mealworm larvae removed from the BFs was observed. Within the grid of BF, three regions were distinguishable which were related to land cover in the safety eco-field process. The experimental framework confirms the adequacy, at least for birds that have cryptic predators, to map the landscape as a proxy of safety resource. From the video recordings it was noted that the European robin visits were distributed throughout the day without apparent temporal preferences, while the great tit visits were concentrated in the central part of the day. This result has the limitation of the short period of observation (March) and should be extended to the entire period of the experiment to eventually capture seasonal variation. The experimental evidence obtained confirms that the ecosemiotic-based models of safety eco-field are an efficient approach to explain bird feeding preferences and behaviours.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12304-023-09522-1.","PeriodicalId":49230,"journal":{"name":"Biosemiotics","volume":"16 1","pages":"61-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9711184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Semiotically Mediated Human-Bee Communication in the Practice of Brazilian Meliponiculture. 巴西Meliponiculture实践中符号学介导的人类-蜜蜂交流。

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Biosemiotics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2

Heidi Campana Piva

{"title":"Semiotically Mediated Human-Bee Communication in the Practice of Brazilian Meliponiculture.","authors":"Heidi Campana Piva","doi":"10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2","url":null,"abstract":"Stingless bees are among the most dominant pollinators in the south tropics. As such, the rational beekeeping of stingless bee species, called meliponiculture, is an ancient and relevant activity, related to sustainable agricultural development, and which connects traditional knowledge to innovation and novelty. Given the relevance of this topic, this paper discusses the possibilities of a semiotically mediated communication between humans and Meliponini (stingless bees). Zoosemiotics, as the studies of animal views of the world, is the ideal modelling system for the investigation of the possibilities of mutual understanding between these two species. Starting from the premise that, for there to be inter-specific communication, there must be a shared code, and that this depends on the biological makeup and sensory apparatus of both organisms involved in the communication process, this research suggests that a possible way to communicate with stingless bees is with the use of olfactory (chemical) signals, since this channel seems to be common to both humans and bees. Considering that for human-animal relations one party must be able to recognize the other (iconic learning), it is revealed that chemical signals do allow bees to recognize individual humans, even going so far as profiling this person as 'not a threat'. Finally, bees are seen to act cooperatively while the beekeeper is taking action to protect and maintain the nest, something that can be interpreted as an opening of semiotic relations, where the bees are deeming the beekeeper as part of their social group.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2.","PeriodicalId":49230,"journal":{"name":"Biosemiotics","volume":"16 1","pages":"105-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9720132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How Minimal Can Consciousness Be? 意识能有多小?

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Biosemiotics Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI: 10.1007/s12304-022-09518-3

L. Irwin