巴西Meliponiculture实践中符号学介导的人类-蜜蜂交流。

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Heidi Campana Piva
{"title":"巴西Meliponiculture实践中符号学介导的人类-蜜蜂交流。","authors":"Heidi Campana Piva","doi":"10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stingless bees are among the most dominant pollinators in the south tropics. As such, the rational beekeeping of stingless bee species, called meliponiculture, is an ancient and relevant activity, related to sustainable agricultural development, and which connects traditional knowledge to innovation and novelty. Given the relevance of this topic, this paper discusses the possibilities of a semiotically mediated communication between humans and Meliponini (stingless bees). Zoosemiotics, as the studies of animal views of the world, is the ideal modelling system for the investigation of the possibilities of mutual understanding between these two species. Starting from the premise that, for there to be inter-specific communication, there must be a shared code, and that this depends on the biological makeup and sensory apparatus of both organisms involved in the communication process, this research suggests that a possible way to communicate with stingless bees is with the use of olfactory (chemical) signals, since this channel seems to be common to both humans and bees. Considering that for human-animal relations one party must be able to recognize the other (iconic learning), it is revealed that chemical signals do allow bees to recognize individual humans, even going so far as profiling this person as 'not a threat'. Finally, bees are seen to act cooperatively while the beekeeper is taking action to protect and maintain the nest, something that can be interpreted as an opening of semiotic relations, where the bees are deeming the beekeeper as part of their social group.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":49230,"journal":{"name":"Biosemiotics","volume":"16 1","pages":"105-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semiotically Mediated Human-Bee Communication in the Practice of Brazilian Meliponiculture.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Campana Piva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stingless bees are among the most dominant pollinators in the south tropics. As such, the rational beekeeping of stingless bee species, called meliponiculture, is an ancient and relevant activity, related to sustainable agricultural development, and which connects traditional knowledge to innovation and novelty. Given the relevance of this topic, this paper discusses the possibilities of a semiotically mediated communication between humans and Meliponini (stingless bees). Zoosemiotics, as the studies of animal views of the world, is the ideal modelling system for the investigation of the possibilities of mutual understanding between these two species. Starting from the premise that, for there to be inter-specific communication, there must be a shared code, and that this depends on the biological makeup and sensory apparatus of both organisms involved in the communication process, this research suggests that a possible way to communicate with stingless bees is with the use of olfactory (chemical) signals, since this channel seems to be common to both humans and bees. Considering that for human-animal relations one party must be able to recognize the other (iconic learning), it is revealed that chemical signals do allow bees to recognize individual humans, even going so far as profiling this person as 'not a threat'. Finally, bees are seen to act cooperatively while the beekeeper is taking action to protect and maintain the nest, something that can be interpreted as an opening of semiotic relations, where the bees are deeming the beekeeper as part of their social group.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosemiotics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"105-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosemiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosemiotics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无刺蜜蜂是南部热带地区最主要的传粉者之一。因此,无刺蜜蜂物种的合理养蜂,被称为meliponiculture,是一项古老而相关的活动,与可持续农业发展有关,并将传统知识与创新和新奇联系起来。鉴于这一主题的相关性,本文讨论了人类与Meliponini(无刺蜜蜂)之间的符号学介导交流的可能性。动物符号学,作为一门研究动物世界观的学科,是研究这两个物种之间相互理解的可能性的理想建模系统。从一个前提出发,为了有种间的交流,必须有一个共享的代码,这取决于参与交流过程的两种生物的生物组成和感觉器官,这项研究表明,与无刺蜜蜂交流的一种可能的方式是使用嗅觉(化学)信号,因为这个通道似乎对人类和蜜蜂都是共同的。考虑到人类与动物之间的关系,一方必须能够识别另一方(标志性学习),研究表明,化学信号确实允许蜜蜂识别个体人类,甚至将这个人描述为“不构成威胁”。最后,当养蜂人采取行动保护和维护蜂巢时,蜜蜂被视为合作行为,这可以被解释为符号关系的开放,蜜蜂将养蜂人视为其社会群体的一部分。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semiotically Mediated Human-Bee Communication in the Practice of Brazilian Meliponiculture.

Stingless bees are among the most dominant pollinators in the south tropics. As such, the rational beekeeping of stingless bee species, called meliponiculture, is an ancient and relevant activity, related to sustainable agricultural development, and which connects traditional knowledge to innovation and novelty. Given the relevance of this topic, this paper discusses the possibilities of a semiotically mediated communication between humans and Meliponini (stingless bees). Zoosemiotics, as the studies of animal views of the world, is the ideal modelling system for the investigation of the possibilities of mutual understanding between these two species. Starting from the premise that, for there to be inter-specific communication, there must be a shared code, and that this depends on the biological makeup and sensory apparatus of both organisms involved in the communication process, this research suggests that a possible way to communicate with stingless bees is with the use of olfactory (chemical) signals, since this channel seems to be common to both humans and bees. Considering that for human-animal relations one party must be able to recognize the other (iconic learning), it is revealed that chemical signals do allow bees to recognize individual humans, even going so far as profiling this person as 'not a threat'. Finally, bees are seen to act cooperatively while the beekeeper is taking action to protect and maintain the nest, something that can be interpreted as an opening of semiotic relations, where the bees are deeming the beekeeper as part of their social group.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12304-022-09519-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosemiotics
Biosemiotics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
37.50%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biosemiotics is dedicated to building a bridge between biology, philosophy, linguistics, and the communication sciences. Biosemiotic research is concerned with the study of signs and meaning in living organisms and systems. Its main challenge is to naturalize biological meaning and information by building on the belief that signs are fundamental, constitutive components of the living world. Biosemiotics has triggered rethinking of fundamental assumptions in both biology and semiotics. In this view, biology should recognize the semiotic nature of life and reshape its theories and methodology accordingly while semiotics and the humanities should acknowledge the existence of signs beyond the human realm. Biosemiotics is at the cutting edge of research on the fundamentals of life. By challenging traditional assumptions on the nature of life and suggesting alternative perspectives, it opens up exciting new research paths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信