Journal for Healthcare Quality最新文献

{"title":"The Use of Quality Improvement in the Physical Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review.","authors":"James P Crick, Timothy J Rethorn, Tyler A Beauregard, Riley Summers, Zachary D Rethorn, Catherine C Quatman-Yates","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000394","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) is a useful methodology for improving healthcare, often through iterative changes. There is no prior review on the application of QI in physical therapy (PT).</p><p><strong>Purpose and relevance: </strong>To characterize and evaluate the quality of the QI literature in PT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four electronic databases from inception through September 1, 2022. Included publications focused on QI and included the practice of PT. Quality was assessed using the 16-point QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy studies were included in the review, 60 of which were published since 2014 with most ( n = 47) from the United States. Acute care ( n = 41) was the most prevalent practice setting. Twenty-two studies (31%) did not use QI models or approaches and only nine studies referenced Revised Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. The median QI-MQCS score was 12 (range 7-15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Quality improvement publications in the PT literature are increasing, yet there is a paucity of QI studies pertaining to most practice settings and a lack of rigor in project design and reporting. Many studies were of low-to-moderate quality and did not meet minimum reporting standards. We recommend use of models, frameworks, and reporting guidelines to improve methodologic rigor and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 5","pages":"280-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10206861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What are Effective Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Care? An Analysis of 121 Randomized Deimplementation Studies.","authors":"Pauline Heus, Simone A van Dulmen, Jan-Willem Weenink, Christiana A Naaktgeboren, Toshihiko Takada, Eva W Verkerk, Isabelle Kamm, Maarten J van der Laan, Lotty Hooft, Rudolf B Kool","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-value care is healthcare leading to no or little clinical benefit for the patient. The best (combinations of) interventions to reduce low-value care are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating deimplementation strategies, to quantify the effectiveness and describe different combinations of strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of 121 RCTs (1990-2019) evaluating a strategy to reduce low-value care, identified by a systematic review. Deimplementation strategies were described and associations between strategy characteristics and effectiveness explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 109 trials comparing deimplementation to usual care, 75 (69%) reported a significant reduction of low-value healthcare practices. Seventy-three trials included in a quantitative analysis showed a median relative reduction of 17% (IQR 7%-42%). The effectiveness of deimplementation strategies was not associated with the number and types of interventions applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Most deimplementation strategies achieved a considerable reduction of low-value care. We found no signs that a particular type or number of interventions works best for deimplementation. Future deimplementation studies should map relevant contextual factors, such as the workplace culture or economic factors. Interventions should be tailored to these factors and provide details regarding sustainability of the effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 5","pages":"261-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10206859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing Factors Influencing Commitment to a Disparities Reduction Intervention: Social Justice Attitudes and Organizational Mission.","authors":"Jill A Marsteller, Yea-Jen Hsu, Kristina Weeks, Modupe Oduwole, Romsai T Boonyasai, Gideon D Avornu, Katherine B Dietz, Zehui Zhou, Deven Brown, Anika Hines, Suna Chung, Lisa Lubomski, Kathryn A Carson, Chidinma Ibe, Lisa A Cooper","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"209-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498376/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10228306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Medication Administration Errors in African Hospitals.","authors":"Wudma Alemu, Jeannie P Cimiotti","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000396","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The incidence of medication administration errors (MAEs) and associated patient harm continue to plague hospitals worldwide. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence to address this problem, especially in Africa. This research synthesis was intended to provide current evidence to decrease the incidence of MAEs in Africa. Standardized search criteria were used to identify primary studies that reported the incidence and/or predictors of MAEs in Africa. Included studies met specifications and were validated with a quality-appraisal tool. The pooled incidence of MAEs in African hospitals was estimated to be 0.56 (CI: 0.4324-0.6770) with a 0.13-0.93 prediction interval. The primary estimates were highly heterogeneous. Most MAEs are explained by system failure and patient factors. The contribution of system factors can be minimized through adequate and ongoing training of nurses on the aspects of safe medication administration. In addition, ensuring the availability of drug use guidelines in hospitals, and minimizing disruptions during the medication process can decrease the incidence of MAEs in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"233-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9819623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Experience and Hospital Context Influence Fall Prevention Practice by Physical Therapists: A Survey Study.","authors":"James P Crick, Lisa Juckett, Marka Salsberry, Carmen Quatman, Catherine C Quatman-Yates","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000382","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls in and following hospitalization are common and problematic. Little is understood about the factors that impede or promote effective implementation of fall prevention practices.</p><p><strong>Purpose and relevance: </strong>Physical therapists are commonly consulted for acute care patients at risk for falling. The purpose of this study is to understand therapist perceptions of their effectiveness in fall prevention and to explore the impact of contextual factors on practice patterns to prevent falls surrounding hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey questions were tailored to the constructs of hospital culture, structural characteristics, networks and communications, and implementation climate, in addition to inquiries regarding practice patterns and attitudes/beliefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 179 surveys were analyzed. Most therapists (n = 135, 75.4%) affirmed their hospital prioritizes best practices for fall prevention, although fewer agreed that therapists other than themselves provide optimal fall prevention intervention (n = 105, 58.7%). Less practice experience was associated with greater odds of affirming that contextual factors influence fall prevention practice (odds ratio 3.90, p < .001). Respondents who agreed that their hospital system prioritizes best practices for fall prevention had 14 times the odds of believing that their system prioritizes making improvements ( p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>As experience influences fall prevention practice, quality assurance and improvement initiatives should be used to ensure minimum specifications of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9753041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Study of the Characteristics Associated With Chronic Pain Documentation on the Problem List.","authors":"Tina L Rylee, David Copenhaver, Christiana Drake, Jill Joseph","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Chronic pain is often elusive because of its specific diagnosis and complex presentation, making it challenging for healthcare providers to develop safe and effective treatment plans. Experts recommend a multifaceted approach to managing chronic pain that requires interdisciplinary communication and coordination. Studies have found that patients with a complete problem list receive better follow-up care. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with chronic pain documentation in the problem list. This study included 126 clinics and 12,803 patients 18 years or older with a chronic pain diagnosis within 6 months before or during the study period. The findings revealed that 46.4% of the participants were older than 60 years, 68.3% were female, and 52.1% had chronic pain documented on their problem list. Chi-square tests revealed significant differences in demographics between those who did and did not have chronic pain documented on their problem list, with 55.2% of individuals younger than 60 years having chronic pain documented on their problem list, 55.0% of female patients, 60.3% of Black non-Hispanic people, and 64.8% of migraine sufferers. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, sex, race/ethnicity, diagnosis type, and opioid prescriptions were significant predictors of chronic pain documentation on the problem list.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9753038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Value of Using a Structured Improvement Approach: A Dedicated Education Unit Exemplar.","authors":"Shea Polancich, Elizabeth Byrd, Rebecca S Miltner, Greg Eagerton, Michele Talley, Linda Moneyham, Jill Stewart, Connie White-Williams","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000393","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Using a structured approach to improvement that integrates methodological frameworks and commonly used improvement tools and techniques allows an improvement team to systematically implement and evaluate an intervention. Authors from one academic medical center will describe our four-step structured improvement approach in the design of a dedicated education unit (DEU) pilot to potentially meet a critical post-COVID-19 workforce need. Using our structured improvement approach, we successfully piloted a DEU with a unit-based clinical educator and 16 nursing students over 26 clinical days and received 13 preintervention surveys from participants. Although the DEU pilot was small with limited data, the structured improvement approach resulted in an organized and systematic way of designing, implementing, and evaluating improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"220-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9819622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Delays in Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Peter Mills, Robin Pendley Louis, Edward Yackel","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000383","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to review patient safety reports in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) related to delays during an 11-month period that included months of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective descriptive analysis of COVID-19 patient safety reports related to delays that were submitted in the Joint Patient Safety Event Reporting System database to the VHA National Center of Patient Safety from January 01, 2020 to November 15, 2020 was conducted. There were 897 COVID-19 patient safety events related to delays; 200 cases were randomly selected for analysis, with 148 meeting inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed delays in laboratory results, level of care, treatment and interventional procedures, specific aspects of care, radiology treatment, and diagnosis. Causes for delays included poor communication between staff, problems in getting laboratory results, confusion over policy, and misunderstanding of COVID-19-specific rules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare delays can be reduced during a pandemic by proactively standardizing medical processes/procedures when testing for infection, improving staff to staff communication teaching the SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and recommendations) communication model, and using simulation to identify latent safety issues and educating medical personnel on new protocols related to the pandemic. Simulation can be used to test new protocols developed during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 4","pages":"242-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10121222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Combined Effect of Delirium and Falls on Length of Stay and Discharge.","authors":"Benjamin Kalivas,&nbsp;Jingwen Zhang,&nbsp;Kristine Harper,&nbsp;Jennifer Dulin,&nbsp;Marc Heincelman,&nbsp;Justin Marsden,&nbsp;Kelly J Hunt,&nbsp;Patrick D Mauldin,&nbsp;William P Moran,&nbsp;Meghan K Thomas","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium or a fall are associated with many negative outcomes including increased length of stay (LOS) and discharge to a facility; however, this relationship is incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of all hospitalizations in a large, tertiary care hospital evaluated the effect of delirium and a fall on the outcomes of LOS and risk of being discharged to a facility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 29,655 hospital admissions. A total of 3,707 (12.5%) patients screened positive for delirium and 286 (0.96%) had a reported fall. After adjustment for covariates, relative to patients without delirium or a fall, patients with delirium only had a 1.64-fold longer LOS; patients with fall only had a 1.96-fold longer LOS; and patients who had delirium and fall had a 2.84-fold longer LOS. The adjusted odds of discharge to a facility, relative to those without delirium or a fall, was 8.98 times higher in those with delirium and a fall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delirium and falls influence LOS and likelihood of being discharged to a facility. The joint impact of falls and delirium on LOS and facility discharge was more than additive. Hospitals should consider the integrated management of delirium and falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 3","pages":"177-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9675160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of ED I-PASS as a Standardized Handoff Tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Evan Yanni,&nbsp;Sharon Calaman,&nbsp;Ethan Wiener,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Fine,&nbsp;Selin T Sagalowsky","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Communication, failures during patient handoffs are a significant cause of medical error. There is a paucity of data on standardized handoff tools for intershift transitions of care in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to improve handoffs between PEM attending physicians (i.e., supervising physicians ultimately responsible for patient care) through the implementation of a modified I-PASS tool (ED I-PASS). Our aims were to: (1) increase the proportion of physicians using ED I-PASS by two-thirds and (2) decrease the proportion reporting information loss during shift change by one-third, over a 6-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After literature and stakeholder review, Expected Disposition, Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situational Awareness, Synthesis by Receiver (ED I-PASS) was implemented using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, incorporating: trained \"super-users\"; print and electronic cognitive support tools; direct observation; and general and targeted feedback. Implementation occurred from September to April of 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when patient volumes were significantly lower than prepandemic levels. Data from observed handoffs were collected for process outcomes. Surveys regarding handoff practices were distributed before and after ED I-PASS implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82.8% of participants completed follow-up surveys, and 69.6% of PEM physicians were observed performing a handoff. Use of ED I-PASS increased from 7.1% to 87.5% ( p < .001) and the reported perceived loss of important patient information during transitions of care decreased 50%, from 75.0% to 37.5% ( p = .02). Most (76.0%) participants reported satisfaction with ED I-PASS, despite half citing a perceived increase in handoff length. 54.2% reported a concurrent increase in written handoff documentation during the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ED I-PASS can be successfully implemented among attending physicians in the pediatric emergency department setting. Its use resulted in significant decreases in reported perceived loss of patient information during intershift handoffs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 3","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9675162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}