Improving Operating Room Efficiency Through Reducing First Start Delays in an Academic Center.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000398
Dylan Singh, Lawrence Cai, Dominique Watt, Elise Scoggins, Samuel Wald, Rahim Nazerali
{"title":"Improving Operating Room Efficiency Through Reducing First Start Delays in an Academic Center.","authors":"Dylan Singh, Lawrence Cai, Dominique Watt, Elise Scoggins, Samuel Wald, Rahim Nazerali","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in operating room (OR) first-case start times can cause additional costs for hospitals, healthcare team frustration and delay in patient care. Here, a novel process improvement strategy to improving first-case start times is presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First case in room start times were recorded for ORs at an academic medical center. Three interventions-automatic preoperative orders, dot phrases to permit re-creation of unavailable consent forms, and improved H&P linking to the surgical encounter-were implemented to target documentation-related delays. Monthly percentages of first-case on-time starts (FCOTS) and time saved were compared with the \"preintervention\" time period, and total cost savings were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first 3-months after implementation of the interventions, the percentage of FCOTS improved from an average of 36.7%-52.7%. Total time savings across all ORs over the same time period was found to be 55.63 hours, which is estimated to have saved a total of $121,834.52 over the 3-month interventional period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By implementing multiple quality improvement interventions, delays to first start in room OR cases can be meaningfully reduced. Quality improvement protocols targeted toward root causes of OR delays can be a significant driver to reduce healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 5","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delays in operating room (OR) first-case start times can cause additional costs for hospitals, healthcare team frustration and delay in patient care. Here, a novel process improvement strategy to improving first-case start times is presented.

Methods: First case in room start times were recorded for ORs at an academic medical center. Three interventions-automatic preoperative orders, dot phrases to permit re-creation of unavailable consent forms, and improved H&P linking to the surgical encounter-were implemented to target documentation-related delays. Monthly percentages of first-case on-time starts (FCOTS) and time saved were compared with the "preintervention" time period, and total cost savings were estimated.

Results: During the first 3-months after implementation of the interventions, the percentage of FCOTS improved from an average of 36.7%-52.7%. Total time savings across all ORs over the same time period was found to be 55.63 hours, which is estimated to have saved a total of $121,834.52 over the 3-month interventional period.

Conclusions: By implementing multiple quality improvement interventions, delays to first start in room OR cases can be meaningfully reduced. Quality improvement protocols targeted toward root causes of OR delays can be a significant driver to reduce healthcare costs.

通过减少学术中心的首次启动延迟来提高手术室的效率。
背景:手术室(OR)首次病例开始时间的延迟可能会导致医院的额外成本、医疗团队的沮丧和患者护理的延迟。在这里,提出了一种新的过程改进策略,以提高首次启动时间。方法:在一家学术医疗中心记录首例病例的手术室开始时间。针对与文件相关的延误,实施了三项干预措施——自动术前命令、允许重新创建不可用同意书的点短语,以及改进与手术遭遇的H&P联系。将首次病例准时启动(FCOTS)的月百分比和节省的时间与“干预前”时间段进行比较,并估计总成本节省。结果:在实施干预措施后的前3个月,FCOTS的百分比从平均36.7%提高到52.7%。在同一时间段内,所有手术室的总时间节省了55.63小时,估计在3个月的干预期内总共节省了121834.52美元。结论:通过实施多种质量改进干预措施,可以显著减少首次室内OR病例的延迟。针对OR延迟根本原因的质量改进方案可以成为降低医疗成本的重要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信