Journal of Knee Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Incidence of Early Adverse Events Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Sercan Yalcin, Karrington Seals, Lutul D Farrow","doi":"10.1055/a-2421-5391","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2421-5391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current literature lacks data regarding perioperative complications after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr). The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of adverse events in the first 90 days after MPFLr. Patients undergoing primary MPFLr between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were included. Predictors of readmission for any reason were identified using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. A total of 140 MPFLrs were included in the final analysis. Of these, 17 patients (12.1%) were admitted in the first 90 days after MPFLr. The most common reason for readmission was pain (7/140, 5%), followed by cellulitis (5/140, 3.5%). The only major complication was pulmonary embolism experienced by one patient (1/140, 0.7%). Univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients who ever smoked were 4.5 times (<i>p</i> = 0.005) more likely to be readmitted in the first 90 days. Although additional soft-tissue procedures increased the readmission rated by 21% (<i>p</i> = 0.810) and additional chondral procedure increased by 35% (<i>p</i> = 0.568), the multivariable analysis did not reveal a significant difference. Surgeons can use this information to counsel patients on what to expect following MPFLr.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"136-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes of Trochleoplasty versus Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Treatment of Patellar Instability Associated with Trochlear Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yehia H Bedeir, Ehsan Akram Ahmed Deghidy","doi":"10.1055/a-2430-0192","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2430-0192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the outcomes of tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) and trochleoplasty for the treatment of patellar instability associated with trochlear dysplasia. This was a systematic review of the literature including published articles that describe either trochleoplasty or TTO in addition to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the surgical treatment of patellar instability associated with trochleoplasty. Main outcomes assessed were Kujala and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, in addition to recurrent instability and complications. Outcome measures reported were provided in a table format and a subjective analysis was performed. Ten studies were included with a total of 362 knees including 132 in the trochleoplasty group and 230 in the TTO group. Mean follow-up ranged from 27.6 to 61.3 months. At the final follow-up, both Kujala and IKDC scores improved significantly in all studies that reported both preoperative and postoperative scores in both groups. There was a total of three instability events in the trochleoplasty group as opposed to 21 in the TTO group. Both procedures, trochleoplasty and TTO, may provide satisfactory functional improvement in patients with patellar instability associated with trochlear dysplasia. However, trochleoplasty may be a better option to minimize the risk of recurrent instability. Level of evidence: level IV, systematic review of level III and level IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Leveraging the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) for Knee Arthroplasty Research.","authors":"Jeffrey B Stambough","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":"38 3","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multidimensional Analysis of Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Identifies Distinct Phenotypes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Secondary Analysis of the SHARKS Registry in a Public Hospital Department.","authors":"Raquel McGill, Corey Scholes, Stephen Torbey, Lorenzo Calabro","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional research on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to predict postoperative satisfaction. We aim to identify distinct patient phenotypes among TKA candidates, and investigate their correlations with patient characteristics. Between 2017 and 2021, patients with primary knee cases at a metropolitan public hospital were enrolled in a clinical quality registry. Demographics, clinical data, and the Veterans Rand 12 and Oxford Knee Score were collected. Imputed data were utilized for the primary analysis, employing <i>k</i>-means clustering to identify four phenotypes. Analysis of variance assessed differences in scores between clusters, and nominal logistic regression determined relationships between phenotypes and patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and laterality. The sample comprised 389 patients with 450 primary knees. Phenotype 4 (mild symptoms with good mental health) exhibited superior physical function and overall health. In contrast, patients in phenotype 2 (severe symptoms with poor mental health) experienced the most knee pain and health issues. Phenotype 1 (moderate symptoms with good mental health) reported high mental health scores despite knee pain and physical impairment. Patient characteristics significantly correlated with phenotypes; those in the severe symptoms with poor mental health phenotype were more likely to be younger, female, have a higher BMI, and bilateral osteoarthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This multidimensional analysis identified TKA patient phenotypes based on common PROMs, revealing associations with patient demographics. This approach has the potential to inform prognostic models, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in joint replacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143068956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contemporary Cementless Patellar Implant Survivorship: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3,005 Patellae.","authors":"Khaled A Elmenawi, Adrian E Gonzalez-Bravo, Larry J Prokop, Charles P Hannon, Matthew P Abdel, Nicholas A Bedard","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-3442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-3442","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, cementless patellar implants were fraught with issues of fixation and polyethylene wear. However, contemporary cementless patellar implants incorporate modern technologies for implant design and offer the potential for improved biological fixation and longevity. As such, an evaluation of the performance of modern cementless patellae is needed. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary cementless patellar implants used during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a particular focus on aseptic loosening of the patellar component.A systematic review of the literature was performed from January 2000 to February 22, 2024. We included all peer-reviewed studies that reported the number of revisions in patients who had cementless patellae placed in 2000 or later during primary TKA. Reviews and case reports were excluded. Out of 639 studies, 13 were included with a total of 3,005 cementless patellae analyzed. The mean patient age was 64 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 31 kg/m². Meta-analyses were performed to calculate the pooled revision rate per person-year of revision for aseptic loosening of the patellar component and revision for any patellar failure.Upon analysis of 13 studies involving a total of 3,005 cementless patellae, the revision rate for aseptic loosening of the patella was 0.2 per 1,000 person-years and the revision rate for any patellar failure was 1 per 1,000 person-years.Contemporary cementless patellar implants showed an overall revision rate of 1 per 1,000 person-years, demonstrating excellent longevity. The high survivorship, together with a low rate of loosening, show the utility and effectiveness of these implants. Given the nature of biologic fixation, these results are promising for long-term implant stability but additional follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143056133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patients Undergoing Manipulation under Anesthesia following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are Their Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Inferior?","authors":"Michael N Sirignano, Robert S Rowe, James C Gainer, Brett W Royster, Langan S Smith, Kyle M Altman, Madhusudhan R Yakkanti, Arthur L Malkani","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-3109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-3109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to decreased function and patient dissatisfaction. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed to improve range of motion (ROM); however, there is no consensus on indications or timing. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients who underwent MUA versus those with an uncomplicated postoperative course following primary TKA. This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 116 consecutive patients who underwent MUA from 2013 to 2019 following primary TKA due to stiffness. Indication for MUA was failure to achieve 105 degrees of knee flexion at 6 weeks following surgery. Five patients underwent revision surgery and 15 patients from the MUA group were excluded: 12 lost to follow-up and 3 deaths. The remaining 96 MUA patients were matched to 288 TKAs who did not require MUA or revision, all with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients who underwent MUA were younger (60.7 vs. 66.3 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and had less preoperative knee flexion (105.4 vs. 110.7 degrees, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were five (4.9%) revisions in the MUA group: two instability, two chronic pain, and one arthrofibrosis. There were no differences between the groups with respect to postoperative Knee Society Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Forgotten Joint Score-12, satisfaction, or complications. Satisfaction rates were 88.5% among MUA patients and 89.6% among non-MUA patients (<i>p</i> = 1.0). Patients undergoing MUA following TKA, using the criteria of failure to achieve 105 degrees of flexion by 6 weeks postoperatively, were able to achieve similar PROMs and satisfaction compared with a control group with a low incidence of revision due to persistent arthrofibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intraoperative Patellar Tendon Injuries during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management Strategies.","authors":"Evan Offord, Innocent Njoku, Nickelas Huffman, Ignacio Pasqualini, Viktor E Krebs, Nicolas S Piuzzi, Matthew E Deren","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-3559","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2509-3559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patellar tendon rupture (PTR) is a rare and severe postoperative complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Even rarer is the intraoperative occurrence of PTR during TKA. PTR is a major complication as it can lead to chronic disability, functional limitations, and postoperative morbidity. Therefore, surgical repair of the intraoperative PTR is typically pursued through one of the following three methods: (i) primary repair with direct suturing; (ii) direct suturing with cerclage augmentation, and (iii) direct suturing with either autograft or synthetic graft augmentation. In the case of an incomplete tear, direct repair with suture anchors for distal tears, and end-to-end repair with/without synthetic graft augmentation for mid-substance and proximal tears, is recommended. In the case of complete tears, if adequate tissue is present, direct repair with extensor mechanism reconstruction should be performed, regardless of the location of the tear. Furthermore, for complete tears with defective tissue, extensor mechanism reconstruction should be performed using mesh or allograft augmentation, regardless of the location of the tear. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and thorough overview of the prevention, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of intraoperative extensor mechanism injuries during TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patellar Instability after Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Gabrielle Swartz, Zuhdi E Abdo, Sandeep S Bains, Jeremy A Dubin, Daniel Hameed, Sumon Nandi, Michael A Mont, Ronald E Delanois, Giles R Scuderi","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-3388","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2509-3388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patellar instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare, yet serious complication, potentially requiring revision surgery or resulting in chronic dysfunction. When encountered, it is paramount to understand the etiologies, diagnostic approaches, treatment options, and outcomes of the selected treatment. The most common cause of patella instability is improper positioning of components, leading to lateral maltracking of the patella. Factors such as internal rotation and/or medialization of femoral or tibial components and lateralization of the patellar button have been identified as factors that contribute to instability. Additionally, a longstanding valgus deformity of the knee may exacerbate patella maltracking. Patients typically present with anterior knee pain, worsened by activities like stair climbing, and may report sensations of giving way. Radiographs and computed tomography scans aid in evaluating component positioning and rotation. Operative intervention is often necessary, with options ranging from soft tissue realignment to component revision. Lateral retinacular release is a common approach, although it is associated with complications such as osteonecrosis of the patella. Proximal or distal realignment procedures may be required if instability persists. Some recent case reports have also described medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as a treatment modality, but more investigation on the topic is still pending. It is important that the treatment strategy address the underlying cause, as failure to do so may result in recurrent instability. The best way to avoid patella instability is to pay attention to all the details of component position and soft tissue balance during the index procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analgesic Effect of Intermittent Multiple IPACK Block Combined with ACB in Patients with Flexion Contracture Knee Arthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Yuqi Ren, Zhouhui Hou, Yue Zhang, Yue Li, Huanqiu Liu","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intermittent multiple infiltrations between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) combined with adductor canal block (ACB) and intermittent ACB alone in patients with flexion contracture knee arthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-six patients who underwent elective unilateral TKA were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 23 each): intermittent multiple IPACK combined with ACB (group IA) and intermittent multiple ACB (group A). ACB was performed with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine in each group and IPACK with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine in group IA. Intermittent multiple nerve blocks were used for postoperative analgesia (IPACK block combined with ACB in group IA and ACB in group A between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m. on postoperative day 1 [POD1] and postoperative day 2 [POD2]). Primary outcomes assessed were pain at rest, motion-evoked pain (MEP), and range of motion (ROM) on POD1 and POD2. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, first ambulation time, ambulation distance, and postoperative complications. We observed that compared with group A, MEP decreased, ROM became wider, ambulation distance was longer, and opioid consumption decreased in group IA. Other outcomes were either similar between the groups or showed clinically insignificant differences. We conclude that multiple intermittent IPACK therapy combined with ACB provides superior analgesia than multiple intermittent ACB therapy alone in patients with flexion contracture knee arthritis undergoing TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intra-Articular Adductor Canal Block Has Equivalent Analgesic Effect to Traditional Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Deyong Huang, Dazhi Zhang, Yi Jiang, Jun Yi, Ke Sun, Hongyi Shao","doi":"10.1055/a-2501-1143","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2501-1143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An adductor canal block (ACB) is widely accepted as a regional nerve block for pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no consensus exists concerning whether the analgesic effect is greater when joint surgeons perform intra-articular ACBs (IA-ACBs) or when anesthesiologists perform ultrasound-guided ACBs (UG-ACBs). We hypothesized that IA-ACBs performed by joint surgeons and UG-ACBs performed by anesthesiologists based on periarticular injections (PAIs) would yield equivalent analgesic effects. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 61 patients who underwent IA-ACBs and 56 patients who received UG-ACB with additional PAI for post-TKA pain management. The primary outcome was postoperative pain assessed using numeric rating scale scores at rest and during exercise. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption and functional recovery. We also investigated local and systemic adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and wound complications. Both groups of patients experienced comparable analgesic effects for both IA-ACB and UG-ACB pain management; however, those who received IA-ACBs were prescribed more opioid equivalents than those in the UG-ACB group on postoperative day 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.048). No differences between the groups were observed regarding local or systemic adverse events. IA-ACBs performed by joint surgeons provided equivalent analgesic effects to UG-ACBs performed by anesthesiologists. However, IA-ACBs may lead to a higher postoperative requirement for opioid analgesics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}