Journal of Informetrics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Factorize international mobility on academic performance: a time-varying DID method examining over 7million Chinese scholars 考虑国际流动性对学业成绩的影响:基于时变DID方法对700多万中国学者的检验
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101698
Wen Lou , Mingzhu Gao
{"title":"Factorize international mobility on academic performance: a time-varying DID method examining over 7million Chinese scholars","authors":"Wen Lou ,&nbsp;Mingzhu Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101698","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101698","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>International academic mobility of researchers provides them with access to global knowledge and innovation and shaping their research activities. This study seeks to examine the impact of international mobility on academic performance of researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We first visualized changes in researchers' academic performance before and after mobility. Then, we employed the Time-varying Difference-in-Differences (DID) model and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methodology to uncover the impact of international mobility on researchers. Finally, we delved deeper into the relationship between international mobility patterns and academic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The visualized analysis results highlight substantial academic advancement in disciplines such as Biomedical and Life Sciences. Notably, researchers returning to China after mobility exhibit the most significant impact on academic performance, followed by those engaged in multiple movements ('circulation') across countries. In contrast, the 'emigration' group, not returning to China after mobility, exhibits the lowest impact on academic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results emphasize how international academic mobility significantly boosts researchers' academic performance. Particularly, researchers returning to China after mobility demonstrate the most substantial impact on academic performance. However, the noticeable surge in researchers leaving China presents a challenge in retaining their expertise. Therefore, it's crucial to promote active participation in international mobility while developing strategies to retain expertise post-mobility, which is vital for the scientific development of China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144290545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative analysis of critical educational trajectories of academicians in China and Japan 中日学者批判教育轨迹之比较分析
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101689
Jinjing Guo , Fang Wang , Hong Wu , Jinxia Huang , Xiao Rui
{"title":"A comparative analysis of critical educational trajectories of academicians in China and Japan","authors":"Jinjing Guo ,&nbsp;Fang Wang ,&nbsp;Hong Wu ,&nbsp;Jinxia Huang ,&nbsp;Xiao Rui","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101689","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101689","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exploring the differences in the critical educational trajectories of academicians between China and Japan and identifying the influencing factors can provide valuable insights into the cultivation and growth of high-level domestic scientific talent. This study adopts the concept of ‘critical growth pathway’ to conduct a comparative analysis of academicians’ educational trajectories in China and Japan from the perspectives of educational continuity, educational institution diversity, and study abroad experience. Chinese academicians typically follow one of three education trajectories: (1) bachelor’s, (2) bachelor’s-master’s-doctorate, or (3) bachelor’s-work-master’s-work-doctorate, while Japanese academicians commonly follow: (1) bachelor’s-direct doctorate, (2) bachelor’s-master’s-doctorate, and (3) bachelor’s-work-doctorate. China tends to emphasise bachelor’s-master’s continuity and master’s-doctorate continuity, whereas Japan shows a stronger preference for direct doctoral continuity. Chinese academicians demonstrate greater diversity in their educational institutions compared to their Japanese counterparts. Most Chinese and Japanese academicians have no overseas study experience, although such experience is more common in Japan than China. Consistent and continuous scientific research training is a critical pathway for cultivating elite scientists, while maintaining coherence across educational stages supports their development. The role of overseas education in cultivating high-level domestic talent is important to reassess, attention should be placed on strengthening local talent development by enhancing mentorship, improving the effectiveness of domestic training systems, and addressing country-specific challenges, particularly as national research and education systems reach more advanced stages. The analytical model developed in this study provides valuable insights for institutional design in policy-driven latecomers and other developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144279367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying delayed recognition of scientists 量化科学家的延迟识别
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101688
Alex J. Yang, Yiqin Zhang, Zuorong Wang, Hao Wang, Sanhong Deng
{"title":"Quantifying delayed recognition of scientists","authors":"Alex J. Yang,&nbsp;Yiqin Zhang,&nbsp;Zuorong Wang,&nbsp;Hao Wang,&nbsp;Sanhong Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101688","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Delayed recognition is a significant phenomenon with implications for career advancement, funding opportunities, and the dissemination of scientific knowledge. Despite its importance, most studies have focused on delayed recognition at the paper level, leaving a gap in understanding how this phenomenon unfolds at the level of individual scientists. This paper presents a novel framework for quantifying delayed recognition in scientists by analyzing their career-level citation trajectories. The framework utilizes two key metrics—the author beauty coefficient (<span><math><mi>AB</mi></math></span>) and author career awakening time (<span><math><msub><mi>A</mi><mrow><mi>t</mi><mi>α</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>)—to capture the temporal dynamics of a scientist’s citation impact over the course of their career. Our analysis demonstrates that these metrics reveal patterns distinct from paper-level measures, with no significant correlation to averaged paper delayed recognition scores. Fixed-effect regression analyses indicate that female scientists and those pursuing novel or disruptive research experience greater delays in recognition. Additionally, through Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) analysis, we find that scientists in smaller groups exhibit higher survival rates in academia but also face more significant delayed recognition. This paper delivers a fresh methodological approach and critical insights into the demographic and research factors driving delayed recognition, enhancing our understanding of scientific impact at the individual level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144255149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific breakthrough speed: a study based on Nobel Prize-winning papers 探索跨学科与科学突破速度的关系——基于诺贝尔奖获奖论文的研究
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101687
Deng Cheng, Zhang Xue
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific breakthrough speed: a study based on Nobel Prize-winning papers","authors":"Deng Cheng,&nbsp;Zhang Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of increasing interdisciplinary research trends, this study explores the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific breakthrough speed (SBS). We employ a “text topics-multiple disciplines” approach to quantify interdisciplinarity and utilize three indicators for measuring SBS: Highest degree to Significant contribution time (HSt), Significant contribution to Nobel Prize winning time (SNt), and Highest degree to Nobel Prize winning time (HNt). Focusing on Nobel laureates in the natural sciences from 1901 to 2023 and their Nobel Prize-winning research (NPw), we construct negative binomial regression models to analyze these variables. Our findings reveal that interdisciplinarity has no significant effect on HSt, but it significantly and positively affects SNt and HNt. This suggests that while interdisciplinary approaches do not delay the initial discovery process, they substantially extend the time required for scientific recognition and award. We also discuss the moderating role of Nobel Prize laureates’ imprint characteristics. Postdoctoral experience plays a negative moderating role in the above relationships, while the moderating effect of overseas experience is not significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144221919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors? 男性主要作者是否比女性主要作者撤回更多的文章?
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101682
Er-Te Zheng , Hui-Zhen Fu , Mike Thelwall , Zhichao Fang
{"title":"Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?","authors":"Er-Te Zheng ,&nbsp;Hui-Zhen Fu ,&nbsp;Mike Thelwall ,&nbsp;Zhichao Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101682","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101682","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientific retractions reflect issues within the scientific record, arising from human error or misconduct. Although gender differences in retraction rates have been previously observed in various contexts, no comprehensive study has explored this issue across all fields of science. This study examines gender disparities in scientific misconduct or errors, specifically focusing on differences in retraction rates between male and female first authors in relation to their research productivity. Using a dataset comprising 11,622 retracted articles and 19,475,437 non-retracted articles from the Web of Science and Retraction Watch, we investigate gender differences in retraction rates from the perspectives of retraction reasons, subject fields, and countries. Our findings indicate that male first authors have higher retraction rates, particularly for scientific misconduct such as plagiarism, authorship disputes, ethical issues, duplication, and fabrication/falsification. No significant gender differences were found in retractions attributed to mistakes. Furthermore, male first authors experience significantly higher retraction rates in biomedical and health sciences, as well as in life and earth sciences, whereas female first authors have higher retraction rates in mathematics and computer science. Similar patterns are observed for corresponding authors. Understanding these gendered patterns of retraction may contribute to strategies aimed at reducing their prevalence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144089393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring the university–industry–government relations synthesized by the Triple Helix and the diversity 三螺旋合成的校企关系及其多样性测度
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101686
Shelia X. Wei , Howell Y. Wang , Sanhong Deng , Wanru Wang , Fred Y. Ye
{"title":"Measuring the university–industry–government relations synthesized by the Triple Helix and the diversity","authors":"Shelia X. Wei ,&nbsp;Howell Y. Wang ,&nbsp;Sanhong Deng ,&nbsp;Wanru Wang ,&nbsp;Fred Y. Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101686","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101686","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Synthesizing the triple helix model and diversity, we introduce two novel indicators, <em>involvement</em> (<em>IV</em>) and <em>interaction</em> (<em>IA</em>), which are established upon the fusion of the triple helix concept and three extended attributes of diversity: proportion, balance, and disparity. These indicators are designed to evaluate one-dimensional involvement and two-dimensional and three-dimensional interaction within university-industry-government (U-I-G) relations. The empirical examination is conducted using two datasets related to CRISPR and fullerene, derived from the Web of Science. Our findings highlight a markedly higher level of involvement within universities compared to industries and governments, attributed to the dominant proportion of universities. We observe that different two-dimensional interactions render distinct performances on the three attributes. The interaction within U-I-G remains relatively low due to the low proportion. We further contrast <em>IV</em> and <em>IA</em> with the triple helix and transmission efficiency metrics, observing distinct differences among them. Consequently, we suggest that through the synthesis of the triple helix and diversity, <em>IV</em> and <em>IA</em> provide a more thorough understanding of involvement and interaction within U-I-G relations, and can inform strategies for their enhancement. The application of <em>IV</em> and <em>IA</em> can potentially extend to examining varying collaborative innovations within other triple or quadruple relations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144083992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determination and characteristics of the most visible authors in multi-author publications 多作者出版物中最引人注目的作者的决定和特征
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101683
Xian Li , Ronald Rousseau , Tao Jia
{"title":"Determination and characteristics of the most visible authors in multi-author publications","authors":"Xian Li ,&nbsp;Ronald Rousseau ,&nbsp;Tao Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101683","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101683","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientific collaboration is an effective approach to tackling complex challenges, with the most visible authors emerging as impactful contributors. This study analyzes over 21 million multi-authored papers in the social sciences, natural sciences, and engineering published between 1983 and 2012. We propose using <u>N</u>onlinear <u>V</u>isibility <u>D</u>etermination with a <u>M</u>odified <u>S</u>igmoid <u>F</u>unction (NVDMS) to identify the most visible authors and investigate their individual (byline order, academic age, gender), organizational (occupations), and national (affiliated country) characteristics across different years and team sizes. Our findings are: (1) From the individual point of view we find that the most visible authors in the social sciences are typically listed first or last, whereas in the natural sciences and engineering, they occupy middle positions. The proportion of those in middle positions increases with time and team sizes. The academic age of the most visible authors rises in the natural sciences and engineering but remains stable over time in the social sciences. While male authors continue to dominate, the gender imbalance decreases with time and team size. (2) From the organizational point of view, the most visible authors are affiliated with universities. A higher proportion of authors in the natural and engineering sciences are employed in the facility sector across various team sizes. (3) Finally, from a regional point of view, the most visible authors are predominantly from the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Germany, with a gradual shift toward eastern regions over time. Our findings offer insight into the structure of scientific teams and valuable implications for stakeholders to support promising scholars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144089394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do OpenCitations and Dimensions serve as an alternative to Web of Science for calculating disruption indexes? openencitations and Dimensions是否可以替代Web of Science来计算中断指数?
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101685
Shuo Xu , Congcong Wang , Xin An , Yunkang Deng , Jianhua Liu
{"title":"Do OpenCitations and Dimensions serve as an alternative to Web of Science for calculating disruption indexes?","authors":"Shuo Xu ,&nbsp;Congcong Wang ,&nbsp;Xin An ,&nbsp;Yunkang Deng ,&nbsp;Jianhua Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101685","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As open access repositories become more prevalent worldwide, scholarly interests in comparative analysis of bibliographic databases are on the rise. Despite this, there is a remarkable scarcity of empirical studies evaluating the efficacy of open and restricted access databases as viable alternatives to traditional closed access models. This study employs the Disruption Index (DI) to analyze three bibliographic databases (<em>WoS, Dimensions</em>, and <em>OpenCitations</em>) across four research fields: Synthetic Biology, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics as established fields, and Blockchain-based Information System Management and Socio-Economic Impacts of Biological Invasions as emerging ones. After extensive experiments, three main findings are observed as follows. (1) The articles with higher citation counts typically exhibit higher DI values across all fields. (2) The <em>WoS</em> and <em>Dimensions</em> consistently demonstrate closer alignment across established and emerging fields. More missing citations in the <em>OpenCitations</em> lead to significant deviations from the <em>WoS</em> in term of DI values. (3) Compared to the <em>OpenCitations</em>, the <em>Dimensions</em> emerges as a superior alternative to the <em>WoS</em> to some extent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144089395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The motivations for and effects of modified fractional counting 改进分数计数的动机和效果
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101681
Gunnar Sivertsen , Ronald Rousseau , Lin Zhang
{"title":"The motivations for and effects of modified fractional counting","authors":"Gunnar Sivertsen ,&nbsp;Ronald Rousseau ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101681","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101681","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A recent contribution to <em>Journal of Informetrics</em> (Donner, 2024) raised important questions about the properties and effects of bibliometric counting methods, mainly focusing on our contribution to the same journal five years ago (Sivertsen, Rousseau, and Zhang, 2019) where we developed and proposed a new counting method called modified fractional counting (MFC) for the measurement of scientific production at aggregate levels such as institutions or countries. Paul Donner identified four possible problems with the MFC indicator that have not been discussed before. Two of them raise fundamental questions about the object of study in scientometrics and research policy studies while the other two are related to the core discussions about responsible research assessment and funding. We respond to all four problems, both conceptually and with new empirical information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144070139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rank-based distributions in scientific papers affiliations: Different forms of Zipf's law with and without higher order inverse participation ratios 科学论文隶属关系中的排名分布:不同形式的齐夫定律有和没有高阶逆参与比
IF 3.4 2区 管理学
Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101684
Malgorzata J. Krawczyk, Mateusz Libirt, Krzysztof Malarz
{"title":"Rank-based distributions in scientific papers affiliations: Different forms of Zipf's law with and without higher order inverse participation ratios","authors":"Malgorzata J. Krawczyk,&nbsp;Mateusz Libirt,&nbsp;Krzysztof Malarz","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101684","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101684","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although often difficult to define and parameterize, scientific collaboration between scientists from different centers and different countries or continents seems to be an interesting and important issue in an increasingly interconnected world. One natural source of such information is scientific papers that include the affiliations of the authors. They do not allow determining the origin of the authors (at least currently), but they can be used to show how large the participation of individual countries in the scientific world is. By analyzing a large set of publications, it is possible to collect chains covering countries and their multiplicity in the affiliations of the authors, and on this basis it is possible to show the most common patterns of collaborating scientific teams. Since in this article we are interested in a more general, statistical approach, the obtained chains are used to calculate an indicator (known as the inverse participation ratio) that expresses different patterns of the distribution of participation of individual countries. We show that the scientific world is another example of universal laws observed in the world because the obtained distribution of inverse participation ratio values obeys Zipf's law.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144070186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信