Political Psychology最新文献_第9页

Projection in Politicians' Perceptions of Public Opinion 政治家对公众舆论感知的投射

1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12900

Julie Sevenans, Stefaan Walgrave, Arno Jansen, Karolin Soontjens, Nathalie Brack, Stefanie Bailer

{"title":"Projection in Politicians' Perceptions of Public Opinion","authors":"Julie Sevenans, Stefaan Walgrave, Arno Jansen, Karolin Soontjens, Nathalie Brack, Stefanie Bailer","doi":"10.1111/pops.12900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12900","url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that politicians' perceptions of public opinion are subject to social projection. When estimating the opinions of voters on a broad range of issues, politicians tend to assume that their own preferences are shared by voters. This article revisits this finding and adds to the literature in three ways. First, it makes a conceptual contribution by bringing together different approaches to the analysis of projection and its consequences. Second, relying on data from surveys with politicians ( n = 866) in four countries (Belgium, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland) conducted between March 2018 and September 2019, it shows that there is more projection in politicians' estimations of their partisan electorate than in their estimations of the general public or of their geographic district. Third, comparing the data on politician projection with data from parallel surveys with citizens, the article reveals that—at least in three out of the four countries studied here—elected politicians are not better at avoiding erroneous projection than ordinary citizens. The article discusses the implications of these findings for the workings of representative democracy.","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135792488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Extraversion Probably Does Not Cause Political Participation. Evidence from Two Genetically Informed Designs 引渡可能不会引起政治参与。来自两个基因知情设计的证据

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12901

Rafael Ahlskog

引用次数: 0

Threats, Emotions, and Affective Polarization 威胁、情绪和情感两极分化

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12899

Emma A. Renström, H. Bäck, Royce Carroll

引用次数: 1

The Paradox of Democracy: Free Speech, Open Media, and Perilous Persuasion. By ZacGershberg and SeanIlling. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 2022. $20.00. 民主的悖论：言论自由、开放媒体和危险的说服。作者：ZacGershberg和Seanlling。伊利诺伊州芝加哥：芝加哥大学出版社。2022年，20.00美元。

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12902

B. T. Leigh

引用次数: 0

You Know You're Right: How Intellectual Humility Decreases Political Hostility 你知道你是对的：知识分子的谦逊如何减少政治敌意

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12903

Glen Smith

引用次数: 0

Feeling Politics at High School: Antecedents and Effects of Emotions in Civic Education 高中情感政治：情感在公民教育中的前因与作用

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12907

Elisabeth Graf, T. Goetz, M. Bieleke, Dana Murano

引用次数: 0

Exploring Different Psychological Processes in a Media Intervention That Reduces Dehumanization Towards Muslims 探索媒体干预中的不同心理过程，减少对穆斯林的非人化

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12905

Roman A. Gallardo, Samantha L. Moore-Berg, Boaz Hameiri

引用次数: 0

Review of The Bitter End: The 2020 Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy. By JohnSides, ChrisTausanovitch and LynnVavreck. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2022. 《苦涩的结局:2020年大选和对美国民主的挑战》书评作者:JohnSides, christstausanovitch和LynnVavreck。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社，2022。

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12898

D. Schlozman

引用次数: 0

Self‐Worth and Politics: The Distinctive Roles of Self‐Esteem and Narcissism 自我价值与政治:自尊与自恋的独特角色

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12897

A. Cichocka, Marta Marchlewska, A. Cislak

引用次数: 3

Politicization of a Pathogen: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of COVID ‐19 Responses in a Nationally Representative U.S. Sample 病原体的政治化：对具有全国代表性的美国样本中COVID-19反应的前瞻性纵向研究

IF 4.6 1区社会学

Political Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI: 10.1111/pops.12894

Daniel P. Relihan, E. A. Holman, Dana Rose Garfin, P. Ditto, R. C. Silver

{"title":"Politicization of a Pathogen: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of\u0000 COVID\u0000 ‐19 Responses in a Nationally Representative U.S. Sample","authors":"Daniel P. Relihan, E. A. Holman, Dana Rose Garfin, P. Ditto, R. C. Silver","doi":"10.1111/pops.12894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12894","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding population-level variability in responses to pathogens over time is important for developing effective health-based messages targeted at ideologically diverse populations. Research from psychological and political sciences suggests that party and elite cues shape how people respond to major threats like climate change. Research on responses to the COVID-19 pandemic suggests similar variability across party identities;however, prior work has methodological limitations. This prospective, longitudinal study of a large probability-based nationally representative U.S. sample assessed in March–April 2020 (N = 6,514) and then 6 months later in September–October 2020 (N = 5,661) demonstrates that COVID-19 fear, perceived COVID-19 death risk, and reported health-protective behaviors became increasingly polarized over the first 6 months of the pandemic. Initial differences between Democrats and Republicans failed to converge over time and became more pronounced. Responses among Republicans were further polarized by support for former President Donald Trump: Trump Republicans initially reported weaker responses to COVID-19 than non-Trump Republicans, and these differences became more pronounced over time. Importantly, political identity and Trump support were not linked to perceived infection risk of a nonpoliticized pathogen, the flu. Finally, political identity and Republican Trump support prospectively predicted COVID-19 vaccine intentions 6 months into the pandemic. © 2023 International Society of Political Psychology.","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45110616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1