Creativity Research Journal最新文献_第10页

Latent Profile Analysis of Working Memory: Relations with Creativity and Academic Achievement 工作记忆的潜像分析：与创造力和学业成绩的关系

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2183323

Isabelle C. de Vink, L. Hornstra, E. Kroesbergen

引用次数: 0

A Quandary in Creativity Studies: Conflicting Theoretical Views from In Vivo versus In Vitro Research 创造力研究的困境：体内与体外研究的理论观点冲突

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2168890

R. Weisberg

{"title":"A Quandary in Creativity Studies: Conflicting Theoretical Views from In Vivo versus In Vitro Research","authors":"R. Weisberg","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2168890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2168890","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much modern laboratory research on creative thinking, or in vitro research, is based on the “remote-associates” perspective, which assumes that creative advances arise through bringing together ideas which were previously “remotely associated,” that is, not directly linked. That view has provided the foundation for modern theorizing across a broad range of areas, including the role of associative processes in creativity, divergent thinking in creativity, attention in creativity, genius and madness, and the neuroscience of creativity. However, contrary to the remote-associates view, analyses of real-life – in vivo – creative thinking indicate that new ideas arose as variations on or extensions of old ideas, rather than through bringing together unrelated ideas in a far-ranging creative leap. This conflict between the in vitro and in vivo perspectives has resulted in a theoretical quandary for creativity studies – a “creativity quandary.” This article examines that quandary. The first section demonstrates the wide reach of the remote-associates view in laboratory research on creativity. The second section examines in vivo creative advances that raise questions for the remote-associates view. The third section presents an alternative conception of creative thinking, based on executive functioning, as a potential resolution of the creativity quandary. Similarities and differences between the present proposal and other recent theoretical analyses of creative thinking are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"324 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45575763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Development of Divergent Thinking in 4- to 6-Year-Old Children 4- 6岁儿童发散性思维的发展

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2182492

Honghong Bai, Hanna Mulder, M. Moerbeek, P. Leseman, E. Kroesbergen

引用次数: 2

Limited Imagination: Effects of Constraints and Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity on Idea Generation 有限的想象力:工作记忆容量的限制和个体差异对创意产生的影响

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2182038

Tim George, Kaila Lasher

引用次数: 0

Imagination as a Facet of Openness/Intellect: A New Scale Differentiating Experiential Simulation and Conceptual Innovation 想象是开放/智力的一个方面:区分经验模拟和概念创新的新尺度

3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2177810

Tyler A. Sassenberg, David M. Condon, Alexander P. Christensen, Colin G. DeYoung

引用次数: 0

Personhood, QOL, and Well-being in People with Dementia undergoing Creative Arts-based Therapies: A Scoping Review 接受创造性艺术治疗的痴呆症患者的人格、生活质量和幸福感:一项范围综述

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2168895

Irfan Manji, Tanita Cepalo, Sergio Ledesma, P. Fallavollita

引用次数: 0

Active procrastination incubates more creative thinking: The sequential mediating effect of personal mastery and creative self-concept 主动拖延孕育更多创造性思维：个人掌握和创造性自我概念的顺序中介效应

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2171721

Huizhi Bai, Xinyi Li, Xuewei Wang, Weishan Tong, Yadan Li, Weiping Hu

引用次数: 0

Building More Accurate Shared Leadership Theory: The Double Threshold Effect of Shared Leadership on Multilevel Creativity 构建更准确的共享领导理论:共享领导对多层次创造力的双门槛效应

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2169515

Mingchuan Yu, D. Doty, Jie Yang

引用次数: 0

On the Generalizability of the Bodily State Effect on Creativity 论身体状态对创造力影响的普遍性

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2171339

Yanyun Zhou, B. Hommel

{"title":"On the Generalizability of the Bodily State Effect on Creativity","authors":"Yanyun Zhou, B. Hommel","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2171339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2171339","url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies found that bodily states have an impact on divergent thinking, but it remains to be seen how generalizable this effect could be, how exactly it depends on cognitive control, and whether similar effects can be found on convergent thinking. To address these questions, we examined the bodily state effect on divergent thinking, convergent thinking, and cognitive control in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants performed the Alternate Uses Task, the Remote Associates Task, and an auditory Stroop task under one of the three bodily states: sitting, standing, or roaming. In Experiment 2, participants completed the three tasks while standing and while roaming. Results showed that bodily state had no significant effect on divergent thinking and the Stroop effect, while roaming shorten the reaction times (Experiment 1) and increased accuracy (Experiment 2) comparing with sitting or standing in the convergent thinking task. Bayesian analysis provided strong or moderately strong evidence for the null hypothesis for these effects. Taken together, the present experiments showed no stable bodily state effect on divergent thinking or convergent thinking and Stroop effect. Possible explanations for the discrepancy between the current results and those reported in previous studies were discussed. ARTICLE HISTORY Received August 24, 2022","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46491294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fostering Creative Agency through Screenwriting: An Intervention 通过编剧培养创意机构:一种干预

IF 2.6 3区心理学

Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2168341

M. McVeigh, Andreia Valquaresma, M. Karwowski

{"title":"Fostering Creative Agency through Screenwriting: An Intervention","authors":"M. McVeigh, Andreia Valquaresma, M. Karwowski","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2168341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2168341","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One of the main drivers of acting creatively is people’s belief that they can do so. Yet, most of the previous work on creative self-concept takes a domain-general perspective, telling us little about whether domain-specific interventions or activities can build people’s creative self-perception. This paper specifically considers the domain of screenwriting to investigate and enlighten the debate in the area. We analyze the impact of an intervention focused on the development of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity in an undergraduate screenwriting course at the Griffith Film School, Griffith University, Australia. The intervention, scaffolded by a creative metacognitive framework was an integral part of the course and was delivered by a Creativity Coach. Our results suggest that enrolling in an intensive and elective screenwriting course which included targeted teaching and self-reflection about creativity and the creative process, significantly improved participants’ creative personal identity (valuing creativity) and creative performance, with no effect on their creative self-efficacy. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and provide recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46124658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0