Ps-Political Science & Politics最新文献_第3页

Is Political Science (Still) Ignoring Religion? An Analysis of Journal Publications, 2011–2020 政治科学(仍然)忽视宗教?2011-2020期刊发表分析

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI: 10.1017/s1049096523000598

S. Kettell

引用次数: 1

Volatility, Realignment, and Electoral Shocks: Brexit and the UK General Election of 2019 波动性、调整和选举冲击:英国脱欧和2019年英国大选

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000422

E. Fieldhouse, Geoffrey Evans, Jane Green, Jonathan Mellon, Christopher Prosser, J. Bailey

引用次数: 1

Divided Images: How the English Perceive Nationhood and How This Shapes Voting and Opinion 分裂的形象:英国人如何看待国家地位，以及这如何影响投票和意见

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000471

Eric P. Kaufmann, David L. Leal, Joe R. Tafoya

引用次数: 0

What Happens When Mini-Publics Are Held in a Deeply Divided Place? Evidence from Northern Ireland 当迷你公众在一个分裂严重的地方举行时会发生什么?来自北爱尔兰的证据

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000409

James Pow, John Garry

{"title":"What Happens When Mini-Publics Are Held in a Deeply Divided Place? Evidence from Northern Ireland","authors":"James Pow, John Garry","doi":"10.1017/S1049096523000409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000409","url":null,"abstract":"A pessimistic view of the potential of deliberative mini-publics to effectively contribute to democratic decision making on highly contested issues in deeply divided places asserts that (1) deliberative quality would be low due to the bitterness prompted by discussion of divisive issues, and (2) levels of opinion change would be low given the stubbornly enduring nature of political attitudes in divided places. We empirically examined this pessimistic view using a quasi-experiment involving mini-publics on two separate issues in Northern Ireland: (1) the contentious ethno-national question of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, and (2) the much less contested and non-ethno-national issue of social care. Contrary to the pessimistic view, we find evidence that from the perspective of the participants themselves, deliberative quality was higher in the mini-public on an ethno-national issue. However, in line with the pessimistic view, levels of self-reported opinion change were significantly lower in the ethno-national mini-public. Overall, the findings highlight the potential for carefully designed deliberative mini-publics to address divisive ethno-national issues: they provide a space for participants to engage with such issues in open and respectful discussion—even if the prospects for attitudinal change are more limited.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":"29 1","pages":"572 - 578"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83962868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

How Divided Is Britain? Symbolic Boundaries and Social Cohesion in Post-Brexit Britain 英国到底有多分裂?英国脱欧后的象征边界与社会凝聚力

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000240

Lindsay Richards, Anthony F. Heath

{"title":"How Divided Is Britain? Symbolic Boundaries and Social Cohesion in Post-Brexit Britain","authors":"Lindsay Richards, Anthony F. Heath","doi":"10.1017/S1049096523000240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000240","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In post-Brexit and post-devolution Britain, relationships among the four nations appear fragile. This article aims to discover where British citizens draw the symbolic boundaries that define in-group and out-group members between nations—in particular, England, Scotland, and Wales—and within England. Within England, we also examine class divides and the North–South divide. We operationalize symbolic boundaries through a set of new innovative measures administered in an online survey in 2019. Questions ascertain agreement that the various groups “share my values,” are “people I could get on with,” and are “straightforward and honest.” Results of our descriptive analysis suggest that boundaries are blurred between the British and the Welsh but sharper for the Scottish. We also find sharp but asymmetrical boundaries within England, between the working class and the middle class, and between Northerners and Southerners. Regional differences in perceptions of Southerners map closely onto those of how well Westminster looks after regional interests, which suggests that power imbalances reduce social cohesion.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":"28 1","pages":"553 - 559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91014670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Brexit as an Identity: Political Identities and Policy Norms 英国脱欧作为一种身份:政治身份与政策规范

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000367

James Tilley, S. Hobolt

{"title":"Brexit as an Identity: Political Identities and Policy Norms","authors":"James Tilley, S. Hobolt","doi":"10.1017/S1049096523000367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000367","url":null,"abstract":"The decision by a narrow majority of British voters to leave the European Union (EU) in 2016 was a political earthquake that few had seen coming. It produced new political divisions, not only between the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe but also within the United Kingdom. In particular, the referendum campaign and the outcome generated two new political identities: “Leavers” and “Remainers.” These Brexit identities crosscut partisan identities and voters formed deep emotional attachments to them (Curtice 2018; Evans and Schaffner 2019). Moreover, this Brexit divide led to affective polarization in the form of out-group animosity and discrimination (Hobolt, Leeper, and Tilley 2021). It also shaped perceptions of the economy (Sorace and Hobolt 2021), attitudes toward immigration (Pickup et al. 2021), vote choices (Hobolt and Rodon 2020), and losers’ consent (Schaffner 2021; Tilley and Hobolt 2023a). Brexit identities have been shown to be salient and politically consequential. Yet, we know much less about whether these new identities are rooted in policy norms that go beyond preferences about the desirability of leaving the EU. In this article, we thus explore the nature of Brexit identities and how they relate to policy norms.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":"56 1","pages":"546 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79558786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The End of the Ethnic Bloc Vote? Ethnic Minority Leavers After the Brexit Referendum 民族集团投票的终结?英国脱欧公投后的少数民族脱欧者

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000288

Nicole S. Martin, M. Sobolewska

{"title":"The End of the Ethnic Bloc Vote? Ethnic Minority Leavers After the Brexit Referendum","authors":"Nicole S. Martin, M. Sobolewska","doi":"10.1017/S1049096523000288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000288","url":null,"abstract":"The 2016 referendum on UK membership in the European Union (EU) led to a realignment of voters along their referendum position (Fieldhouse et al. 2021; Sobolewska and Ford 2020). By December 2019, both the Conservative Party and the Labour Party received approximately 80% of their support from voters who had been on “their” side during the referendum (Fieldhouse et al. 2021). Brexit identities were akin to partisanship, with affective polarization and perceptual screening (Sobolewska and Ford 2020; Sorace and Hobolt 2021). Research also traces the Brexit vote to a growing values divide (Evans and Menon 2017), with ethnocentric attitudes found on opposing sides of the referendum (Sobolewska and Ford 2020). The views of ethnic minority voters, as traditional victims of white ethnocentrism, have been seen largely in this debate as the same as the identity of liberal Remainers. However, despite the assumption that minorities naturally would fall on the side opposing white ethnocentrism, the referendum marked the biggest departure from the traditional ethnic minorities bloc vote since 2005, when a substantial minority of Muslim voters deserted Labour over the Iraq War (Curtice, Fisher, and Steed 2005). The Leave side in the 2016 referendum received approximately one third of the votes of ethnic minorities (Martin, Sobolewska, and Begum 2020), despite Leave also drawing a majority of its support from “UKIP-curious” voters (Evans and Mellon 2019) who had voted for or considered supporting the anti-immigrant radical-right United Kingdom Independence Party.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":"19 1","pages":"566 - 571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87984046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Symposium on the Contemporary Politics of the United Kingdom: Introduction and Reflections 英国当代政治研讨会:介绍与反思

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096523000410

David L. Leal

引用次数: 0

As We Like It: Did the UK’s 2016 EU Referendum Reveal the “Will of the People?” 如我们所愿:2016年英国脱欧公投揭示了“民意”吗?

IF 3.3 3区社会学

Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1017/S104909652300046X

Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij, W. Allen

引用次数: 0

Integrating Research Methods Training into Elective Courses in an Undergraduate Curriculum 将研究方法训练纳入本科选修课程