European Journal of Psychological Assessment最新文献_第7页

Validation of the Short Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS-10) 短距离冒名顶替者现象量表(cip -10)的验证

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000747

Bo Wang, Wendy Andrews, M. Bechtoldt, S. Rohrmann, Reinout E. de Vries

引用次数: 2

A Common Measurement Scale for Self-Report Instruments in Mental Health Care 心理健康护理中自我报告工具的通用测量量表

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000740

E. de Beurs, S. Oudejans, B. Terluin

{"title":"A Common Measurement Scale for Self-Report Instruments in Mental Health Care","authors":"E. de Beurs, S. Oudejans, B. Terluin","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000740","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The diversity of measures in clinical psychology hampers a straightforward interpretation of test results, complicates communication with the patient, and constitutes a challenge to the implementation of measurement-based care. In educational research and assessment, it is common practice to convert test scores to a common metric, such as T scores. We recommend applying this also in clinical psychology and propose and test a procedure to arrive at T scores approximating a normal distribution that can be applied to individual test scores. We established formulas to estimate normalized T scores from raw scale scores by regressing IRT-based θ scores on raw scores. With data from a large population and clinical samples, we established crosswalk formulas. Their validity was investigated by comparing calculated T scores with IRT-based T scores. IRT and formulas yielded very similar T scores, supporting the validity of the latter approach. Theoretical and practical advantages and disadvantages of both approaches to convert scores to common metrics and alternative approaches are discussed. Provided that scale characteristics allow for their computation, T scores will help to better understand measurement results, which makes it easier for patients and practitioners to use test results in joint decision-making about the course of treatment.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46799734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Don’t Keep It Too Simple 不要让它太简单

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000741

Beatrice Rammstedt, L. Roemer, D. Danner, Clemens M. Lechner

{"title":"Don’t Keep It Too Simple","authors":"Beatrice Rammstedt, L. Roemer, D. Danner, Clemens M. Lechner","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000741","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. When formulating questionnaire items, generally accepted rules include: Keeping the wording as simple as possible and avoiding double-barreled items. However, the empirical basis for these rules is sparse. The present study aimed to systematically investigate in an experimental design whether simplifying items of a personality scale and avoiding double-barreled items (i.e., items that contain multiple stimuli) markedly increases psychometric quality. Specifically, we compared the original items of the Big Five Inventory-2 – most of which are either double-barreled or can be regarded as complexly formulated – with simplified versions of the items. We tested the two versions using a large, heterogeneous sample ( N = 2,234). The simplified versions did not possess better psychometric quality than their original counterparts; rather, they showed weaker factorial validity. Regarding item characteristics, reliability, and criterion validity, no substantial differences were identified between the original and simplified versions. These findings were also replicated for the subsample of lower-educated respondents, who are considered more sensitive to complex item formulations. Our study thus suggests that simplifying item wording and avoiding double-barreled items in a personality inventory does not improve the quality of a questionnaire; rather, using simpler (and consequently more vague) item formulations may even decrease factorial validity.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45455647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Evaluating an Abbreviated Version of the Circumplex Team Scan Inventory of Within-Team Interpersonal Norms 评估一种简化版的团队内部人际规范的环形团队扫描量表

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000752

K. Locke, Chris C. Martin

{"title":"Evaluating an Abbreviated Version of the Circumplex Team Scan Inventory of Within-Team Interpersonal Norms","authors":"K. Locke, Chris C. Martin","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000752","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The Circumplex Team Scan (CTS) assesses the degree to which a team’s interaction/communication norms reflect each segment (16th) of the interpersonal circle/circumplex. We developed and evaluated an abbreviated 16-item CTS-16 that uses one CTS item to measure each segment. Undergraduates ( n = 446) completing engineering course projects in 139 teams completed the CTS-16. CTS-16 items showed a good fit to confirmatory structural models (e.g., that expect greater positive covariation between items theoretically closer to the circumplex). Individuals’ ratings sufficiently reflected team-level norms to justify averaging team members’ ratings. However, individual items’ marginal reliabilities suggest using the CTS-16 to assess general circumplex-wide patterns rather than specific segments. CTS-16 ratings correlated with respondents’ and their teammates’ ratings of team climate (inclusion, justice, psychological safety). Teams with more extraverted (introverted) members were perceived as having more confident/engaged (timid/hesitant) cultures. Members predisposed to social alienation perceived their team’s culture as relatively disrespectful/unengaged, but their teammates did not corroborate those perceptions. The results overall support the validity and utility of the CTS-16 and of an interpersonal circumplex model of team culture more generally.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46501962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Homework Approach Scale for Middle School Students 中学生作业方法量表

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-11 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000746

Fuyi Yang, Jianzhong Xu, Kasia Gallo, J. C. Núñez

引用次数: 2

Measurement Invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in South Korea 韩国生活满意度量表的测量不变性

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-11 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000745

Mohsen Joshanloo

引用次数: 0

Out-of-Level Cognitive Testing of Children with Special Educational Needs 特殊教育需要儿童的水平外认知测试

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000736

Timo Gnambs, Lena Nusser

{"title":"Out-of-Level Cognitive Testing of Children with Special Educational Needs","authors":"Timo Gnambs, Lena Nusser","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000736","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Children with special educational needs in the area of learning (SEN-L) have severe learning disabilities and often exhibit substantial cognitive impairments. Therefore, standard assessment instruments of basic cognitive abilities designed for regular school children are frequently too complex for them and, thus, unable to provide reliable proficiency estimates. The present study evaluated whether out-of-level testing with the German version of the Cognitive Abilities Test using test versions developed for younger age groups might suit the needs of these children. Therefore, N = 511 children with SEN-L and N = 573 low achieving children without SEN-L attending fifth grades in Germany were administered four tests measuring reasoning and verbal comprehension that were designed for fourth graders. The results showed that children with SEN-L exhibited significantly more missing responses than children without SEN-L. Moreover, three of the four tests were still too difficult for them. Importantly, no substantial differential response functioning was found for children with and without SEN-L. Thus, out-of-level testing might represent a feasible strategy to assess basic cognitive functioning in children with SEN-L. However, comparative interpretations would require additional norms or linked test versions that place results from out-of-level tests on a common metric.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49254415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Psychological Capital PCQ-12 Scale 心理资本PCQ-12量表的贝叶斯验证因子分析

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000738

J. M. Tomás, S. Martínez-Gregorio, Amparo Oliver

引用次数: 6

Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Personal Financial Wellness Scale 个人财务健康量表的验证与测量不变性

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000750

E. K. Buabang, Sarah Ashcroft-Jones, Celia Esteban Serna, Katarina Kastelic, Jakob Kveder, Amanda Lambertus, Tasja S. Müller, K. Ruggeri

{"title":"Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Personal Financial Wellness Scale","authors":"E. K. Buabang, Sarah Ashcroft-Jones, Celia Esteban Serna, Katarina Kastelic, Jakob Kveder, Amanda Lambertus, Tasja S. Müller, K. Ruggeri","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000750","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In 2020, 17.1% of the population in the European Union was at risk of poverty ( Eurostat, 2021 ). Poverty is often assessed using objective measures such as absolute and relative income levels. However, different individuals may experience different levels of financial stress at the same income level. Therefore, it is crucial to have measures that capture the subjective components of poverty. In this multinational study, we tested the validity and measurement invariance of the Personal Financial Wellness (PFW) scale across six European countries (Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK) and the US, and six languages (German, Italian, Dutch, Slovenian, Spanish, and English). Results provided mixed evidence for the fit of the expected one-factor structure. Exploration of a modified one-factor structure indicated an improved fit. The scale showed excellent reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. This suggests that the PFW scale captures subjective financial stress and is a dependable self-report measure. Measurement invariance testing of the modified one-factor model showed metric invariance across Slovenia, Spain, the UK, and the US. Given that scalar invariance was not achieved and the invariance testing was based on an exploratory model, we do not advise the use of the scale for comparisons between countries.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45375967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Generalizability, Replicability, and New Insights Derived From Registered Reports Within Understudied Populations 研究不足人群中注册报告的可推广性、可复制性和新见解

IF 2.5 3区心理学

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000743

P. Edelsbrunner, K. Ruggeri, K. Damnjanović, Samuel Greiff, J. Lemoine, M. Ziegler

引用次数: 0