Science and Public Policy最新文献_第9页

Science diplomacy in the Global South—an introduction 全球南方的科学外交——导论

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad028

Derya Büyüktanir Karacan, Pierre-Bruno Ruffini

引用次数: 0

Do winners pick government? How scale-up experience shapes entrepreneurs’ assessments of innovation policy mixes 赢家会选择政府吗?规模化经验如何影响企业家对创新政策组合的评估

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad030

S. Denney, Travis Southin, David A. Wolfe

引用次数: 0

European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution 绿色和数字革命的欧洲产业政策

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad018

Alessio Terzi, Monika Sherwood, Aneil Singh

引用次数: 1

Science diplomacy from a nation-state’s perspective: a general framing and its application to Global South countries 民族国家视角下的科学外交：一个总体框架及其在全球南方国家的应用

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad023

Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, O. Krasnyak

引用次数: 0

The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration 20世纪70年代初科学外交全球化的历史探索

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad026

Sam Robinson, M. Adamson, Gordon Barrett, L. Jacobsen, S. Turchetti, A. Homei, P. Marton, L. Aronowsky, Iqra Choudry, Johan Gärdebo, Jaehwan Hyun, Gerardo Ienna, Carringtone Kinyanjui, Beatriz Martínez-Rius, Júlia Mascarello, Doubravka Olšáková, Giulia Rispoli, Waqar H. Zaidi

{"title":"The globalization of science diplomacy in the early 1970s: a historical exploration","authors":"Sam Robinson, M. Adamson, Gordon Barrett, L. Jacobsen, S. Turchetti, A. Homei, P. Marton, L. Aronowsky, Iqra Choudry, Johan Gärdebo, Jaehwan Hyun, Gerardo Ienna, Carringtone Kinyanjui, Beatriz Martínez-Rius, Júlia Mascarello, Doubravka Olšáková, Giulia Rispoli, Waqar H. Zaidi","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scad026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad026","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The early 1970s brought fundamental transitions in international scientific collaboration that significantly affected the international relations in global patterns that are still relevant today. This article uses a multi-perspective approach to argue that the underlying condition for the globalization of science diplomacy was the increasing participation of recently independent countries in international technoscientific affairs, examining critical research areas, including space exploration, oceanography, nuclear technoscience, the environmental sciences, and health and population studies. Themes emerged at that time that continue to characterize what we term ‘Global Science Diplomacy’: multipolarity, resistance and agency, lack of global consensus, regional alliances and interests, and the centrality of the United Nations system to the conduct of transnational science. This survey is a first step in historical reflection on this phenomenon and shows that it was the emergence of the Global South in Science Diplomacy affairs that made Science Diplomacy global at the beginning of the 1970s.","PeriodicalId":47975,"journal":{"name":"Science and Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41961382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Scientific collaborations between Latin America and Europe: an approach from science diplomacy towards international engagement 拉丁美洲和欧洲的科学合作：从科学外交走向国际交往

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-03 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad025

L. F. Echeverría-King, Aura Fossati, N. Raja, Kleinsy Bonilla, B. Urbani, R. K. Whiffen, Tereza Vizinová

{"title":"Scientific collaborations between Latin America and Europe: an approach from science diplomacy towards international engagement","authors":"L. F. Echeverría-King, Aura Fossati, N. Raja, Kleinsy Bonilla, B. Urbani, R. K. Whiffen, Tereza Vizinová","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scad025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad025","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 International collaborations show asymmetries and imbalances that influence how countries take part in international relations. In this context, science diplomacy (SD) could offer possibilities towards building partnerships and meaningful engagement between Europe and Latin America. The purpose of this article is to analyse how scientific collaborations between Latin American and European researchers are carried out, observing trends, behaviours, and perceptions. Qualitative methodologies and the analysis of empirical data collected through a survey allow the extraction of relevant experiences from real cases of international joint projects. Findings indicate that addressing the asymmetries in the collaboration between partnering researchers from Europe and Latin America is essential, and SD approaches may facilitate such endeavour. SD may not represent a panacea; however, it seems to facilitate the internationalisation of research in terms of mobility, international scientific collaborations, and knowledge exchange with under-represented actors in traditional international scientific schemes, such as indigenous communities.","PeriodicalId":47975,"journal":{"name":"Science and Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46633988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring indicators for monitoring sociotechnical system transitions through portfolio networks 探索通过投资组合网络监测社会技术系统转变的指标

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad015

Caetano C. R. Penna, Oscar Y. Romero Goyeneche, C. Matti

引用次数: 0

Ideology, knowledge, and the assessment of science policy agencies 意识形态、知识和科学政策机构的评估

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad020

Kathryn Haglin, A. Vedlitz

引用次数: 0

Coloniality in science diplomacy—evidence from the Atlantic Ocean 科学外交中的殖民主义——来自大西洋的证据

4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad027

Andrei Polejack

{"title":"Coloniality in science diplomacy—evidence from the Atlantic Ocean","authors":"Andrei Polejack","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scad027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad027","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ocean science diplomacy stands for the social phenomena resulting from the interaction of science and diplomacy in ocean affairs. It refers, inter alia, to the provision of scientific evidence in support of international decision-making, the building of alliances through scientific cooperation, and the enhancement of international collaborative marine research. Despite this generalization, we still lack an understanding of the sense practitioners make of ocean science diplomacy. This paper reports on perceptions of ocean science diplomacy collected through twenty in-depth interviews with South and North Atlantic government officials and researchers involved in the All-Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance. In principle, interviewees perceive ocean science diplomacy as a positive and critically important phenomenon that combines the best of science and diplomacy. However, below this generally positive perception, there seems to be a polarization of power between science and policy and also between South and North Atlantic perspectives. Scientists have reported feeling suspicious of policymaking processes, while officials portray science as unaccountable and segregated from policy. South Atlantic researchers expressed concern over limited research capabilities, and officials reported an openness to the scientific evidence presented by scientists. Northern interviewees, with reported enhanced research capabilities, seem more inclined to search for the right scientific evidence in support of national political goals. A preconceived sense of the other is what seems to permeate South–North Atlantic relationships. Northern subjects make sense of their Southern peers as those in need of assistance, while Southern interviewees claimed being unheard and victims of tokenism. I discuss these findings in light of postcolonial and decolonial theories, advocating for the need to decolonize ocean science diplomacy in the Atlantic Ocean if we are to achieve its alluded benefits.","PeriodicalId":47975,"journal":{"name":"Science and Public Policy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135249800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Does international R&D cooperation under institutional agreements have a greater impact than those without agreements? 制度性协议下的国际研发合作是否比非制度性协议下的影响更大?

IF 2.7 4区管理学

Science and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scad019

P. Feitosa, S. Salles-Filho, Adriana Bin, Yohanna Juk, F. Colugnati

引用次数: 0