Business Ethics-A European Review最新文献_第5页

Organizational Environmental Orientation and Employee Environmental In‐Role Behaviors: A Cross‐Level Study 组织环境取向与员工环境角色行为:一项跨水平研究

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12241

Rommel O. Salvador, Alex Burciaga

{"title":"Organizational Environmental Orientation and Employee Environmental In‐Role Behaviors: A Cross‐Level Study","authors":"Rommel O. Salvador, Alex Burciaga","doi":"10.1111/beer.12241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12241","url":null,"abstract":"Amid the growth of scholarly research on environmental workplace behaviors, two limitations stand out. First, there has been scant research on the cross‐level effects of organizational‐level determinants on individual employee environmental behaviors using a methodologically appropriate multilevel analytic approach. Second, there has been an overwhelming focus on voluntary, as opposed to task‐related, employee environmentally friendly behaviors. In addressing these limitations, this field study (N = 615 U.S.‐based employees nested in 51 organizations) makes a theoretical and empirical contribution to the literature, specifically by linking the dimensions of organizational‐level environmental orientation with individual‐level employee environmental in‐role (i.e., task‐related) behaviors using multilevel analysis. The results indicate that organizational internal environmental orientation is positively related to employee recycling behavior. Managerial status exerts a moderating effect, such that the positive relationship between internal environmental orientation and energy‐saving behavior is stronger among managers than among non‐managers. Furthermore, an organization's external environmental orientation has an unequivocal positive relationship only with employee energy‐saving behavior. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74217696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

Do Employees Value Strategic CSR? A Tale of Affective Organizational Commitment and its Underlying Mechanisms 员工是否重视企业社会责任战略?情感性组织承诺及其机制研究

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12227

Pablo Rodrigo, Claudio Aqueveque, Ignacio J. Duran

{"title":"Do Employees Value Strategic CSR? A Tale of Affective Organizational Commitment and its Underlying Mechanisms","authors":"Pablo Rodrigo, Claudio Aqueveque, Ignacio J. Duran","doi":"10.1111/beer.12227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12227","url":null,"abstract":"Virtually all studies that focus on the relationship between CSR perceptions and employees’ organizational commitment have not taken into consideration the fit between social and environmental activities and a firm’s business‐unit strategy. This is essential to inquire because scholars have argued that when companies ingrain CSR activities into their strategy‐making process (i.e., in their vision, mission, and overall business model), this might send a more compelling message that resonates closer to workers’ personal standards, and actually enhance employee‐level outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no certainty “if” and “how” these evaluations could affect employees’ organizational commitment. To address this issue, we use cue consistency theory and social identity theory as overarching frameworks to develop a model where we conceptually link perceptions of strategy‐CSR fit with a particular type of organizational commitment: affective. In addition, we posit and test three mediators to understand the underlying psychological mechanisms of this relationship: perceived external prestige, organizational identification, and work meaningfulness. Through structural equation modeling, and using a heterogeneous final sample of 579 employees, we find compelling evidence to support the fact that strategy‐CSR fit enhances employees’ affective organizational commitment through the proposed mediators. Academic contributions and practical implications are then discussed.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90931520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 58

A Dynamic Stakeholder Model: An Other‐Oriented Ethical Approach 动态利益相关者模型:以他人为导向的伦理方法

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12222

Akram Hatami, Naser Firoozi

{"title":"A Dynamic Stakeholder Model: An Other‐Oriented Ethical Approach","authors":"Akram Hatami, Naser Firoozi","doi":"10.1111/beer.12222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12222","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we reflect on the role of the Other in ethical decision‐making in corporations. The Other, in the form of a corporation's stakeholders, has already been discussed in the scientific literature, but there are still some Others that remain unconsidered and that call on corporations to be responsible. Drawing on the philosophy of Levinas, we wish to highlight a green earth and future generations as two non‐immediate Others within a corporation's group of stakeholders whose voices are silenced. We argue that Levinasian ethics can be used as a framework to extend traditional stakeholder theory in a dynamic sphere. With this model, corporations can understand the vital role that both a green earth and future generations play in their existence and can respond to contingencies by considering delays. We enrich our paper with illustrative cases to present some serious environmental disasters that have occurred as a result of ignoring the Other. Finally, we show that understanding the Other as a part of a corporation's identity can create new avenues for “infinite responsibility” towards Others. We contribute to the relevant literature by highlighting that both a green earth and future generations are important but ignored stakeholder parties whose claims urgently need to be addressed.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87793925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

The Motivations of External Whistleblowers and Their Impact on the Intention to Blow the Whistle Again 外部举报人的动机及其对再次举报人意愿的影响

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2019-02-08 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12224

Heungsik Park, David Bruce Lewis

引用次数: 20

A reinvigorated vision for BE:ER to sustain a trajectory of excellence BE:ER重新焕发活力的愿景，以维持卓越的轨迹

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12261

D. Jamali, R. Barkemeyer, J. Leigh, G. Samara

引用次数: 8

Leadership Styles and Corporate Social Responsibility Management: Analysis from a Gender Perspective 领导风格与企业社会责任管理:基于性别视角的分析

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12139

M. Alonso‐Almeida, Jordi Perramon, Llorenç Bagur‐Femenías

{"title":"Leadership Styles and Corporate Social Responsibility Management: Analysis from a Gender Perspective","authors":"M. Alonso‐Almeida, Jordi Perramon, Llorenç Bagur‐Femenías","doi":"10.1111/beer.12139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12139","url":null,"abstract":"Companies' perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been only partially analyzed from an individual perspective that focuses on personal characteristics and professional backgrounds. However, a gap exists in the research on manager leadership styles and CSR perceptions from a gender perspective. Therefore, this article analyzes differences in attitudes toward various dimensions of CSR by focusing on the leadership styles—transformational, dominance, and dual perspectives—of male and female managers in Spain. A total of 391 respondents in top management positions in Spain were surveyed. The findings revealed similarities and differences between genders with respect to leadership styles and CSR perceptions by dimension using a univariate analysis. A causal model that employed structural equation modeling was also estimated. The findings suggest that for transformational and dual leadership styles, Spanish women may be more adaptable and effective at pursuing company sustainability than Spanish men. However, dominance leadership was found to be the worst leadership style for deploying a CSR strategy. A number of conclusions for business management can be drawn, and some directions for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"38 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82821292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 60

Humanistic and economistic approaches to banking - better banking lessons from the financial crisis?: Business Ethics: A European Review 用人文主义和经济学的方法研究银行业——从金融危机中吸取更好的银行业教训?《商业伦理:欧洲评论》

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/BEER.12131

M. Pirson, Anuj Gangahar, F. Wilson

引用次数: 10

Does it Really Pay to Be Good, Everywhere? A First Step to Understand the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Link in Latin American Controversial Industries 处处优秀真的值得吗?了解拉丁美洲争议行业企业社会和财务绩效联系的第一步

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12119

Pablo Rodrigo, Ignacio J. Duran, Daniel Arenas

引用次数: 64

A Tangled Web: Views of Deception from the Customer's Perspective 错综复杂的网络:从顾客的角度看欺骗

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12068

E. Gillespie, Katie Hybnerova, Carol L. Esmark, Stephanie Nobel

引用次数: 16

Use of Focus Groups in Business Ethics Research: Potential, Problems and Paths to Progress 焦点小组在商业伦理研究中的应用:潜力、问题和进步之路

IF 4.8

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/beer.12097

C. Cowton, Yvonne Downs

{"title":"Use of Focus Groups in Business Ethics Research: Potential, Problems and Paths to Progress","authors":"C. Cowton, Yvonne Downs","doi":"10.1111/beer.12097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12097","url":null,"abstract":"The use of focus groups is a well‐established qualitative research method in the social sciences that would seem to offer scope for a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge and understanding in the field of business ethics. This paper explores the potential contribution of focus groups, reviews their contribution to date and makes some recommendations regarding their future use. We find that, while the use of focus groups is not extensive, they have been utilised in a non‐negligible number of studies. Focus groups are usually used as a supplementary method, often as part of the development of a research instrument. Whether used on their own or in conjunction with other methods, we find that in the majority of cases there is insufficient information for a reader to judge that the method has been carried out well and hence that the ‘findings’ may be trusted. Nor is it easy for future researchers to learn about the practical application of the method in business ethics contexts. We therefore recommend improved reporting in future published studies. Based on an analysis of a subsample of papers that provided a reasonable level of methodological detail, we provide further insights into, and recommendations for, the use of focus groups in business ethics research.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77829691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23