外部举报人的动机及其对再次举报人意愿的影响

IF 4.8 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2019-02-08 DOI:10.1111/beer.12224

Heungsik Park, David Bruce Lewis

{"title":"外部举报人的动机及其对再次举报人意愿的影响","authors":"Heungsik Park, David Bruce Lewis","doi":"10.1111/beer.12224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to inquire into the relative importance of morality, cost‐benefit, and emotion as motivations for the decision to blow the whistle externally, and the effects of such factors as motivations, perceived negative consequences, and preferences for reform on the intention to blow the whistle again. Based on a literature review, we formulated some hypotheses and, to test them, we used the data collected from a survey of 127 external whistleblowers in South Korea. The results revealed that morality was the most important motivation, followed by emotion, and then cost‐benefit, which thus, seemed to be the least important for the whistleblowers. Morality as a motivation and the perceived negative consequences of whistleblowing had a significant effect on the intention to blow the whistle again. This study helps advance the understanding of the motivations behind whistleblowing and the factors that influence the intention to blow the whistle again.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Motivations of External Whistleblowers and Their Impact on the Intention to Blow the Whistle Again\",\"authors\":\"Heungsik Park, David Bruce Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/beer.12224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to inquire into the relative importance of morality, cost‐benefit, and emotion as motivations for the decision to blow the whistle externally, and the effects of such factors as motivations, perceived negative consequences, and preferences for reform on the intention to blow the whistle again. Based on a literature review, we formulated some hypotheses and, to test them, we used the data collected from a survey of 127 external whistleblowers in South Korea. The results revealed that morality was the most important motivation, followed by emotion, and then cost‐benefit, which thus, seemed to be the least important for the whistleblowers. Morality as a motivation and the perceived negative consequences of whistleblowing had a significant effect on the intention to blow the whistle again. This study helps advance the understanding of the motivations behind whistleblowing and the factors that influence the intention to blow the whistle again.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Ethics-A European Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Ethics-A European Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics-A European Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 20

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨道德、成本效益和情感作为决定对外举报的动机的相对重要性，以及动机、感知到的负面后果和对改革的偏好等因素对再次举报意图的影响。在文献综述的基础上，我们提出了一些假设，并使用了从韩国127名外部举报人的调查中收集的数据来验证这些假设。结果显示，道德是最重要的动机，其次是情感，然后是成本效益，因此，这对举报人来说似乎是最不重要的。道德作为动机和感知到的举报负面后果对再次举报的意愿有显著影响。本研究有助于进一步了解举报人背后的动机以及影响举报人再次举报人意愿的因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Motivations of External Whistleblowers and Their Impact on the Intention to Blow the Whistle Again

The purpose of this study was to inquire into the relative importance of morality, cost‐benefit, and emotion as motivations for the decision to blow the whistle externally, and the effects of such factors as motivations, perceived negative consequences, and preferences for reform on the intention to blow the whistle again. Based on a literature review, we formulated some hypotheses and, to test them, we used the data collected from a survey of 127 external whistleblowers in South Korea. The results revealed that morality was the most important motivation, followed by emotion, and then cost‐benefit, which thus, seemed to be the least important for the whistleblowers. Morality as a motivation and the perceived negative consequences of whistleblowing had a significant effect on the intention to blow the whistle again. This study helps advance the understanding of the motivations behind whistleblowing and the factors that influence the intention to blow the whistle again.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Business Ethics-A European Review Multiple-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： -To offer rigorous and informed analysis of ethical issues and perspectives relevant to organizations and their relationships with society -To promote scholarly research and advance knowledge in relation to business ethics and corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship by providing cutting edge theoretical and empirical analysis of salient issues and developments -To be responsive to changing concerns and emerging issues in the business ethics and business and society sphere, and to seek to reflect these in the balance of contributions -To be the publication outlet of choice for all types of original research relating to business ethics and business-society relationships. Original articles are welcomed. Each issue will normally contain several major articles, and there will be an occasional FOCUS section which will contain articles on an issue of particular importance and topicality. Other regular features will include editorial interviews, book reviews, comments and responses to published articles, research notes and case studies. Business Ethics: A European Review is well established as an academic research journal which is at the same time readable, user-friendly and authoritative. It publishes both fully refereed scholarly papers and special contributions such as speeches and reviews. The range of contributions reflects the variety and scope of ethical issues faced by business and other organisations world-wide, and at the same time seeks to address the interests and concerns of the journals readership.