Psychology Crime & Law最新文献_第8页

‘You can have a bit of my pain, see how it feels’ – understanding male prisoners who engage in dual harm behaviours “你可以感受一下我的痛苦，看看感觉如何”——理解有双重伤害行为的男囚犯

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-16 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2037593

Amanda Pickering, N. Blagden, K. Slade

{"title":"‘You can have a bit of my pain, see how it feels’ – understanding male prisoners who engage in dual harm behaviours","authors":"Amanda Pickering, N. Blagden, K. Slade","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2037593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2037593","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prison-based violence and self-harm are continuing to rise. Recent research is increasingly showing that for some prisoners, self-harm and violence co-occur, i.e. they engage in dual harm. This study contributes to the developing research and literature focusing on dual harm by presenting an analysis of the dual harm experiences of six men residing in a Category B English prison. Participants were interviewed and their narratives analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Superordinate and subordinate themes were identified, and they shed further light on why men in prison dual harm and what influences their decision to engage in one type of harm over the other at any given time. The findings indicate that co-occurrence is not coincidental. Participants experienced a combination of interlinking factors and complex temporal and experiential relationships underpinning the two behaviours: experiencing difficult and unpredictable environments, an incoherence of sense of self and identity, painful psychological and emotional states, and connections to early adverse experiences. The findings are discussed in line with the growing dual harm research and wider psychological literature. Limitations of the study and future research directions are provided, and implications for policy and practice are suggested.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"45 1","pages":"825 - 848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80977373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Perceived justice, negative emotions and delinquency in Chinese high schools and vocational schools 中国高中与职业学校学生的公平感、负性情绪与犯罪行为

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-16 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2039652

Jinwu Zhang, Jianhong Liu, Shan Cui, Honglan Shuai

引用次数: 0

Do adolescent risk assessment tools capture self-reported reasons for desistance? An examination of the content validity of protective factors 青少年风险评估工具是否能捕捉到自我报告的拒绝原因?保护因素内容效度的检验

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038155

Aisha K Christiansen, Jodi L. Viljoen

{"title":"Do adolescent risk assessment tools capture self-reported reasons for desistance? An examination of the content validity of protective factors","authors":"Aisha K Christiansen, Jodi L. Viljoen","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038155","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 This study used a novel approach to assess the content validity of three adolescent risk assessment tools: the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY; Borum et al., 2006), the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk – Youth Version (SAPROF-YV; de Vries Robbé et al., 2015), and the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START:AV; Viljoen et al., 2014). In-person interviews and online surveys were conducted with people with a history of adolescent offending (n = 103), which included open-ended questions about their desistance from offending, followed by direct questions based on the tools’ protective factors. Responses were coded using directed content analyses based on the tools’ item definitions. In open-ended questions, across participants all items were mentioned, and all items were rated as important by at least some participants. Only a few additional themes emerged that were not captured by the tools. In addition, participants primarily discussed the presence of protective factors rather than the removal of risk factors, suggesting they represent distinct constructs. Overall the findings support the content validity of the SAVRY, SAPROF-YV, and START:AV protective factors, and highlight the value of perspectives from people with lived experience in risk assessment research.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"63 1","pages":"849 - 874"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87404001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Perspectives of juror-eligible adults: validation of the Juror Questionnaire of Values and Viewpoints (JQVV) for capital cases 陪审员资格成人的观点:死刑案件陪审员价值观和观点问卷(JQVV)的验证

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2034816

R. Rogers, Sara E. Hartigan, Minqi Pan, E. Drogin, Jordan E. Donson

{"title":"Perspectives of juror-eligible adults: validation of the Juror Questionnaire of Values and Viewpoints (JQVV) for capital cases","authors":"R. Rogers, Sara E. Hartigan, Minqi Pan, E. Drogin, Jordan E. Donson","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2034816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2034816","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Criminal defendants have a 6th Amendment right to an impartial jury, but customary methods of jury selection often fail to uncover deeply held juror attitudes. Addressing the death penalty as a polarizing issue, the Juror Questionnaire of Values and Viewpoints (JQVV) was validated and cross-validated with two separate MTurk studies of capital jury-eligible adults. With complete anonymity assured by MTurk, Study 1 assessed death-penalty attitudes for 354 juror-eligible participants and their likelihood of mispresenting their views during voir dire. Validity of the JQVV was assessed with the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ) and predicted differences for Support-Death and Support-Life group. Study 2, with an entirely new sample of 313 juror-eligible adults, cross-validated the JQVV and tested the effects of positive impression management (PIM). Importantly, Support-Death mostly expressed their candid views even with the PIM condition. Although Support-Life frequently denied their death-penalty views, the JQVV Prosecution-Cynicism (Pro-Cyn) scale proved moderately effective at identifying their denials. Professional implications for capital jury selection are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"21 1","pages":"768 - 794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88044121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How potential jurors evaluate eyewitness confidence and decision time statements across identification procedures and for different eyewitness decisions 潜在的陪审员如何评估证人的信心和决定时间陈述跨越鉴定程序和不同的证人的决定

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038156

Curt A. Carlson, Robert F. Lockamyeir, Alyssa R. Jones, Jacob A. Hemby

{"title":"How potential jurors evaluate eyewitness confidence and decision time statements across identification procedures and for different eyewitness decisions","authors":"Curt A. Carlson, Robert F. Lockamyeir, Alyssa R. Jones, Jacob A. Hemby","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2038156","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Based on its importance in the criminal justice system, it is critical to understand how jurors interpret eyewitness identification evidence in the form of photo arrays and witness statements. We addressed several unresolved questions, including: How do potential jurors interpret eyewitness statements regarding confidence and decision speed? Are suspect identifications from fair lineups trusted more than those from biased lineups or showups? What if the eyewitness chooses a filler or rejects the lineup? Three experiments with large demographically-diverse U.S. samples provided three novel results. First, identifications with fast statements (e.g. ‘I identified him instantly.’) were trusted more than identifications with slow statements (e.g. ‘I recognized him after a few minutes.’) unless they were supported with low confidence, when speed statement had no effect. Second, biased lineups were often not perceived as biased, but when they were, suspect identifications were not trusted. Third, neither confidence nor speed statements had any impact on judgments of suspect guilt when participants were informed that a filler was chosen or the lineup/showup was rejected. We recommend that jurors be educated regarding how to appropriately evaluate eyewitness evidence.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"70 1","pages":"875 - 902"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80621288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

When bad things happen to rotten people: indifference to incidental harms in the criminal justice system 当坏事发生在堕落的人身上时:对刑事司法系统的附带伤害漠不关心

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2036739

Melissa de Vel-Palumbo, Colleen M. Berryessa

{"title":"When bad things happen to rotten people: indifference to incidental harms in the criminal justice system","authors":"Melissa de Vel-Palumbo, Colleen M. Berryessa","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2036739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2036739","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When we see others in pain, sympathy is often our instinctive and expected response. Yet in some cases, we may be indifferent to—and even take pleasure in—the suffering of others. Particularly, the public has historically expressed apathy toward and even endorsement of incidental harms experienced by those in the criminal justice system (i.e. catching a disease or experiencing abuse or neglect in custody). In this paper, we propose a new conceptual framework for understanding these views. We contend that people make character-based judgments to justify the incidental suffering of people who have committed crimes. By being in prison, or by having committed a crime in the past, one may be viewed as fundamentally distinct from other citizens—now categorized as a fundamentally “rotten” person who deserves any further suffering they might experience. We explore the nature of incidental harms suffered by those in the criminal justice system, as well as identify potential psychological and cognitive mechanisms that may underlie public indifference to such suffering, including psychological essentialism and immanent justice reasoning. Finally, we outline the legal and social implications of such views, and ultimately, propose ways in which future research might advance knowledge about this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"21 1","pages":"795 - 808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80838472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Perceptions of radicalisation in mental health care and the security domain: roles, responsibilities, and collaboration 对精神卫生保健和安全领域激进化的看法:角色、责任和合作

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030333

B. Sizoo, B. Doosje, B. van Meijel

{"title":"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Perceptions of radicalisation in mental health care and the security domain: roles, responsibilities, and collaboration","authors":"B. Sizoo, B. Doosje, B. van Meijel","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030333","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates how perceptions of radicalisation and co-occurring mental health issues differ between mental health care and the security domain, and how these perceptions affect intersectoral collaboration. It is generally thought that intersectoral collaboration is a useful strategy for preventing radicalisation and terrorism, especially when it concerns radicalised persons with mental health issues. It is not clear, however, what perceptions professionals have of radicalisation and collaboration with other disciplines. Data was obtained from focus groups and individual interviews with practitioners and trainers from mental health care and the security domain in the Netherlands. The results show a lack of knowledge about radicalisation in mental health care, whereas in the security domain, there is little understanding of mental health issues. This leads to a mad-bad dichotomy which has a negative effect on collaboration and risk management. Improvement of the intersectoral collaboration by cross-domain familiarization, and strengthening of trust and mutual understanding, should begin with the basic training of professionals in both domains. The Care and Safety Houses in the Netherlands offer a sound base for intersectoral collaboration. Future professionals from different domains ought to be familiarized with each other’s possibilities, limitations, tasks, and roles.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"8 1","pages":"548 - 565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84965979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Development and application of an offense severity index in the evaluation of treatment of individuals convicted of sexual crimes 犯罪严重程度指标在性犯罪处理评价中的应用

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2032054

E. Link, F. Lösel

{"title":"Development and application of an offense severity index in the evaluation of treatment of individuals convicted of sexual crimes","authors":"E. Link, F. Lösel","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2032054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2032054","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dichotomous recidivism criteria are the main measure of success in forensic treatment studies. However, there is wide agreement that binary outcome measures are too undifferentiated, particularly when official reoffending rates are rather low. Considering previous research on offense severity and the Cambridge Crime Harm Index, we addressed this issue by developing a severity index based on sentencing provisions in the German law. Based on a large dataset of males convicted of sexual crimes who had been released from Bavarian prisons between 2004 and 2008, we analyzed the subgroup of n = 48 individuals who recidivated with a sexual offense. About half of the sample had received treatment during imprisonment. Whereas prior analyses did not reveal a significant treatment effect on dichotomous sexual reoffending, the present harm analyses showed a stronger decrease of sex offense severity for treated compared to untreated participants. Despite some limitations of our study, the results indicate that prison-based treatment might decrease the severity of sexual reoffending in males convicted of sexual offenses. From a harm reduction perspective, our findings support the use of severity measures complementary to dichotomous outcome criteria. The applicability of our severity index and implications for future research on prison-based treatment are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"22 1","pages":"722 - 739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80775747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: that’s a problem 目击者的高度自信总是令人信服的:这是个问题

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2021.2007912

Kylie N. Key, J. Neuschatz, S. D. Gronlund, Danielle K. DeLoach, S. A. Wetmore, Ryan M. McAdoo, Duncan McCollum

引用次数: 1

Objection, your Honour: examining the questioning practices of Canadian judges 反对，法官大人:审查加拿大法官的质询行为

IF 1.4 4区社会学

Psychology Crime & Law Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030737

Christopher J. Lively, L. Fallon, Brent Snook, Weyam Fahmy

{"title":"Objection, your Honour: examining the questioning practices of Canadian judges","authors":"Christopher J. Lively, L. Fallon, Brent Snook, Weyam Fahmy","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030737","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Judges are the gatekeepers of evidence in the justice system. Granted that witness testimony is pivotal to the truth-seeking function of the criminal justice system, and that judges sometimes intervene and ask questions in the courtroom to help ensure the testimony is accurate, little is known about judges’ questioning practices. In the current study, we examine the questioning practices of a sample of Canadian judges. A total of 3,140 utterances spoken by 15 different judges across 22 criminal cases (169 witness examinations) were classified as one of 13 utterance types, and assessed as a function of examination type; utterance and response lengths were also calculated. Results showed that, when talking to witnesses directly, most of the questions asked were clarification (37%), followed by facilitators (17%), and closed yes/no (10%); less than 1% of all question types were open-ended. The longest answers were provided in response to open-ended questions. We also found that closed yes/no questions were the most frequently used question types during judge-led lines of questioning (i.e. examinations per curium), as opposed to lawyer-led lines of questioning (i.e. during direct and cross examinations). Implications for the truth-seeking function of the justice system are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"165 1","pages":"677 - 695"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72435854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0