{"title":"Nondiscrimination as Discrimination: The MFN Obligation and International Trade Law","authors":"Sannoy Das","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2026.10176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2026.10176","url":null,"abstract":"There is a widespread sense among international economic lawyers that the most-favored-nation obligation, as the expression of a nondiscrimination norm is fundamental for international trade law. But ought they adorn MFN with its normative halo? This article studies the historical emergence of the MFN-as-fundamental mythology. It shows that this mythology is the outcome of three controversial projects over the course of the twentieth century. Embedded historically, they reveal that much less than nondiscrimination, MFN has historically been the vector for drawing the boundaries across which discrimination operates, whether between imperial powers and colonies, or between the West and the East. It is only out of a relatively recent, and intellectually radical turn that MFN became synonymous with the very idea of a universalist, nondiscrimination-centric, international trade law. But that intellectual universe—ordoliberalism—now being past us, this Article asks what account can we offer of alternative norms that have structured international trade law.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147744073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legal Entrepreneurship and the Invention of Legal Meaning: Revisiting Lord Asquith’s Abu Dhabi Award","authors":"Jason Yackee","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10153","url":null,"abstract":"Lord Asquith’s 1951 award in the Abu Dhabi arbitration is widely recalled as one of the first reasoned international decisions to apply the “General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations” to a dispute between a state and a private investor. The award is also widely reviled. Asquith is said to be a racist, and the award an embarrassment, and no other application of general principles has done more to delegitimize the concept. This Article draws on extensive archival research to show that the case exemplifies the ways in which international lawyers act as legal entrepreneurs, investing in the (re)creation of international legal precedent.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147733656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aldo Zammit Borda, Stefan Mandelbaum, Andrea Maria Pelliconi
{"title":"THE ILC STUDY ON TEACHINGS AS SUBSIDIARY MEANS: ARGUMENTS FOR A PLURALIST READING","authors":"Aldo Zammit Borda, Stefan Mandelbaum, Andrea Maria Pelliconi","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2026.10154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2026.10154","url":null,"abstract":"The International Law Commission’s ongoing study on subsidiary means identifies a significant pattern: international courts predominantly cite teachings from a narrow cohort of Western, male scholars. The Commission’s response, adopting “representativeness” to ensure geographic and demographic proportionality, while well-intentioned, could reflect a misalignment if this concept is applied formalistically. Unlike state-derived sources of law, teachings derive their authority from analytical rigor rather than representative mandates. This article argues that applying representativeness to scholarly works may misconceive their epistemological function within Article 38(1)(d). We propose a pluralist approach grounded in three interconnected arguments: epistemological (disrupting legalist assumptions about determinacy), dialectical (mediating between formal law and lived experience), and sociological (challenging inherited patterns of judicial reasoning). While acknowledging that both pluralism and representativeness remain susceptible to formalistic application, we suggest a purposive reading of “representativeness” that embraces pluralism as offering a more direct pathway to surfacing the assumptions embedded within legalist methodology.","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146071686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Injustices of Reparations","authors":"Antony Anghie","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10078","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The campaign for reparations for colonial violence, slavery, and exploitation is now becoming a global phenomenon, as claims are being pursued in different jurisdictions and international forums.<span>1</span> Each of these claims has its own specific legal character because of various factors including the forum in which it is brought, the applicable law, and the identity of the plaintiffs. Nevertheless, many reparations claims are based on appeals to international law, to developments in international human rights law and international criminal law, and specific prohibitions on slavery and genocide. It would appear intuitive that international law would provide remedies to the blatant injustices that are the subject of these claims. Slavery and exploitation have been denounced in the Durban Declaration<span>2</span> and genocide and crimes against humanity including apartheid and other such practices are listed in the statute of the International Criminal Court.<span>3</span> International law, however, has been largely a creation of the European powers; and historically, the law has facilitated rather than remedied colonial violence.<span>4</span> It is unsurprising then that many claims for reparations encounter some basic legal obstacles.<span>5</span> This is hardly coincidental. A legal system that is based on conquest will not readily permit an inquiry into its imperial origins, far less remedies for the injustices it permitted, indeed, mandated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Jus Cogens and Reparations: Can We Just End the Separation?","authors":"Dire Tladi","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10079","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between international law on reparations and <span>jus cogens</span> is an uneasy one. The law on reparations is a settled part of classical international law, with roots so deep that its place in international law is taken for granted.<span>1</span> The oft-quoted dictum in the 1928 <span>Chorzów Factory</span> case which sets out the requirement for reparation to “as far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of [an] illegal act and re-establish the situation” which would have existed but for the unlawful act was said, at the time, to be based on “international practice and … decisions of arbitral tribunals.”<span>2</span> The same is not true of <span>jus cogens</span>, a relatively new entrant to the mainstream of international law, whose pedigree in the system is less assured, and whose <span>application,</span> as opposed to mere references, by international courts is almost non-existent.<span>3</span> Yet, at the same time, at the heart of both reparations and <span>jus cogens</span>, is the notion of justice. The idea of undoing the effects of a wrongful act is intrinsically about (re)balancing the scales, while the notion of <span>jus cogens</span> seeks to infuse the system of international law with community values and a spirit of justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transforming the World with Reparations?","authors":"Ingrid Brunk, Monica Hakimi","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10095","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue of the <span>American Journal of International Law</span>—devoted entirely to reparations in international law—offers a range of perspectives on reparations for large-scale harms relating to colonialism, slavery, industrialization, and transboundary pollution. As the symposium authors describe, the gap between the reparations that justice might demand and the ones that international law provides is enormous. The international law for reparations does not come close to remedying such harms and is not poised to do so anytime soon.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Race, Reparations, and International Law","authors":"E. Tendayi Achiume","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>Mr. President, we remain resolute in our commitment to combating all forms of racism, racial discrimination and xenophobia and related intolerance whether that be at home or abroad…. Nonetheless, we have a number of concerns with this text….</span></p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reparations for Colonialism Beyond Legal Responsibility","authors":"Steven Ratner","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reparations for colonialism and colonial-era atrocities have moved from an unrealized demand of citizens, politicians, and thinkers in the Global South to a project with some results in the real world. Key markers include the return of numerous art objects from museums in the Global North to their countries of origin;<span>1</span> the release of the Caribbean Community and Common Market’s (CARICOM) proposal for reparations;<span>2</span> and Namibia’s agreement with Germany on compensation for the German genocide against the Herero people in 1904–08<span>3</span>—along with the resultant controversy. These developments follow earlier claims for reparations directed to—and their eventual acceptance by—the governments of Canada and New Zealand, domestic courts in the Netherlands and the UK, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.<span>4</span> At the same time, it remains the case that reparations for colonialism are overall few and far between.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"395 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Statement by the Editors-in-Chief of the American Journal of International law","authors":"Ingrid Brunk, Monica Hakimi","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10087","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As Editors-in-Chief of the <span>American Journal of International Law</span>, we endeavor to promote the study and practice of international law through broad, open, critical, and vigorous debate, both on and off the pages of the <span>Journal</span>. The success of our enterprise depends on freedom of inquiry—the ability to research, investigate, evaluate, theorize, challenge, collaborate, write, lecture, and publish without influence, coercion, or apprehension. The <span>Journal</span> can fulfill this mission only if the teaching, study, and practice of international law in the United States (and beyond) proceed without political conditions or fear of retribution. Recent actions by the U.S. government and broader trends in the United States demonstrate a lack of commitment to law and institutions in ways that undermine our work. In particular, the government’s threats to universities and research journals undercut the study and teaching of international law, its threats to law firms and non-profit organizations impinge on the practice of international law, and its targeting of people with varying immigration statuses on the basis of their lawful exercise of free speech silences important voices in our community.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Empowering International Law to Address Claims for Climate Reparations","authors":"Lavanya Rajamani","doi":"10.1017/ajil.2025.10084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2025.10084","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A fundamental and widely recognized inequity at the core of the existential climate crisis facing the planet today is that those who have contributed the least to climate change are also the most affected. The United States, European Union-28, Russia, Japan, and Canada, according to some accounts, are together responsible for 85 percent of global greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions thus far.<span>1</span> Yet it is the climate vulnerable—least developed countries, low lying, and small island states among others—that are at the frontlines of climate impacts. There is widespread scientific and diplomatic consensus on the multiple causes and devastating impacts of climate change but so far justice for vulnerable states has proven elusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":47841,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of International Law","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144995384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}