Research Evaluation最新文献_第6页

University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact 英国的大学政策参与机构以及影响的不同含义和方法

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac015

Hannah Durrant, E. MacKillop

{"title":"University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact","authors":"Hannah Durrant, E. MacKillop","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvac015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Over the last decade, there has been a proliferation of policy engagement bodies set up within universities worldwide. The present study focuses on the British experience of this phenomenon but with relevance to other contexts. Multiple factors are at play to explain this growth, from the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda (which assesses and ranks the quality of research in UK universities and has been echoed in other countries) to universities’ renewed focus on their civic mission, and a growing demand within policy and practice circles for more research evidence. Based on interviews with senior staff and analysis of their websites and documentary outputs, this article offers a comprehensive catalogue of university policy engagement bodies across the UK, and classifies them into types based on their activities, outputs, impact, and staff. We enrich this categorization by examining the stories these bodies tell to explain how and why they have emerged, and the variable approaches they adopt as they seek to influence both academic and policymaking practices. In doing so, we develop a typology of university policy engagement bodies, and demonstrate how they seek to partake in changing the roles and identities of universities, and their relationship with policymaking.","PeriodicalId":47668,"journal":{"name":"Research Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44193868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations 自动引文推荐工具鼓励有问题的引文

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac016

S. Horbach, Freek Oude Maatman, W. Halffman, Wytske M. Hepkema

引用次数: 3

Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Definition Impact on Recruitment Progress. 评估修订后的美国国立卫生研究院临床试验定义对招募进展的影响。

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-17 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac003

Eugene I Kane, Gail L Daumit, Kevin M Fain, Roberta W Scherer, Emma Elizabeth McGinty

{"title":"Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Definition Impact on Recruitment Progress.","authors":"Eugene I Kane, Gail L Daumit, Kevin M Fain, Roberta W Scherer, Emma Elizabeth McGinty","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvac003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac003","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a revised, expanded definition of \"clinical trial\" in 2014 to improve trial identification and administrative compliance. Some stakeholders voiced concerns that the policy added administrative burden potentially slowing research progress.Methods: This quasi-experimental study examined the difference-in-differences impact of the new NIH clinical trial definition policy on participant recruitment progress in grants funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).Results: 132 funded clinical trial grants were identified. While more grants were identified as clinical trials under the revised definition, the difference-in-differences in recruitment progress before and after the policy change was not statistically significant.Conclusions: The revised NIH clinical trial definition had no clear effect on recruitment progress in newly-identified NIMH-funded clinical trials as compared to traditionally-identified clinical trials. Concerns that administrative delays and burden could impact study progress may be alleviated by these initial results.","PeriodicalId":47668,"journal":{"name":"Research Evaluation","volume":"31 2","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558491/pdf/nihms-1840571.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33517102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac007

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac012

引用次数: 2

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac005

引用次数: 1

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac006

引用次数: 1

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac002

引用次数: 2

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac013

引用次数: 3

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 3.3 4区管理学

Research Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac010

引用次数: 1