Medical Education Online最新文献

{"title":"Developing a framework for promoting interest and engagement of scholarship of teaching and learning for medical students.","authors":"Ritvik Bhattacharjee, Austin Reynolds, Lilian Zhan, Laura Knittig, Ranjini Nagaraj, Yuan Zhao","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2336332","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2336332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is a field of academic research that focuses on improving learning through reflective and informed teaching. Currently, most SoTL-related work is faculty-driven; however, student involvement in SoTL has been shown to benefit both learners and educators. Our study aims to develop a framework for increasing medical students' interest, confidence, and engagement in SoTL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A student-led SoTL interest group was developed and a year-round program of SoTL was designed and delivered by student leaders of the group under the guidance of a faculty advisor. Individual post-session surveys were administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of each session. Pre- and post-program surveys were administered to evaluate the program impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The year-round SoTL program consistently attracted the participation of medical students and faculty. Survey responses indicated strong medical student interest in the program and positive impact of the program. Increased interest and confidence in medical education research were reported by the student participants. The program design provided opportunities for student participants to network and receive ongoing feedback about medical education research they were interested or involved in.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides insights for developing a framework that other institutions can reference and build upon to educate and engage students in SoTL.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2336332"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986435/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140337252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A retrospective observational study - exploring food pantry referral as a clinical proxy for residents' ability to address unmet health-related social needs.","authors":"Michelle March, Daniel Schumacher, Andrew F Beck, Mary Carol Burkhardt, Allison Reyner, Melissa Klein","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2404295","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2404295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of residents' ability to address unmet health-related social needs to promote social accountability remains subjective and difficult. Existing approaches rely on self-assessment surveys of residents' knowledge, skills, and attitudes following social determinants of health training, with few studies explicitly measuring clinical practice. We aimed to characterize social accountability using resident referrals to a food pantry embedded in a pediatric primary care center as an objective measure of resident ability to address unmet health-related social needs in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study occurred from 1 January 2019, to 30 June 2020, at an urban, pediatric primary care center with an embedded food pantry. All pediatric residents received social accountability education during a 2-week Advocacy rotation intern year. During clinic visits, pediatric residents were expected to act on results of a standardized social screen that included two food insecurity questions. Food pantry referral was the primary outcome. Food pantry referral data were extracted from food pantry logs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 18-month study period, the pediatric primary care center food pantry was accessed at 1,031 visits. Of the 860 physician-based visits that resulted in pantry referral, 63% (<i>n</i> = 545) were initiated by residents. Eighty-six percent of residents (134/156) made ≥ 1 referral. Across all years, residents placed a mean of 3 (range 1-16) food pantry referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During our study, most residents placed at least one pantry referral in response to identifying food insecurity either via the screen or during conversation with the family. Referral to a primary care embedded food pantry, one way to address acute food insecurity may serve as a measurable proxy to assess residents' ability to address unmet health-related social needs and promote social accountability in healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2404295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prevent and report: a qualitative inquiry of student and faculty recommendations for preventing and reporting learner mistreatment.","authors":"Alejandra Colón-López, Ashley Parish, Anne Zinski","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2428170","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2428170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many medical schools in the United States (US) have employed policies and programming to prevent mistreatment and encourage students to report mistreatment events. Yet, there is little evidence showing a large-scale decrease in mistreatment behaviors overall, and, in many cases, mistreatment events go unreported. This study examines views from medical students and faculty for preventing mistreatment during medical training, as well as strategies for encouraging learners to report mistreatment events when they occur. We conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with students and faculty (<i>n</i> = 25) and compared and contrasted perspectives. To prevent mistreatment, both students and faculty recommended institutional-level guidance and behavioral expectations during training, while faculty suggested educational programming focused on clarifying mistreatment definitions and cultivating awareness. To encourage reporting of mistreatment events, students and faculty emphasized: access to an array of reporting mechanisms, institutional processes for maintaining anonymity or confidentiality, and follow-up procedures to address reported mistreatment. Our results suggest that students' and faculty's role in medical education may shape their perceptions of strategies to prevent mistreatment. These results can inform the development and customization of interventions for preventing mistreatment and encouraging mistreatment reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2428170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574973/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiologist preferences for faculty development initiatives to improve resident feedback in the era of competency-based medical education.","authors":"Laura Wong, Ethan Sacoransky, Wilma Hopman, Omar Islam, Andrew D Chung, Benjamin Y M Kwan","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2357412","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2357412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2022, all Canadian post-graduate medical programs have transitioned to a Competence by Design (CBD) model within a Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) framework. The CBME model emphasized more frequent, formative assessment of residents to evaluate their progress towards predefined competencies in comparison to traditional medical education models. Faculty members therefore have increased responsibility for providing assessments to residents on a more regular basis, which has associated challenges. Our study explores faculty assessment behaviours within the CBD framework and assesses their openness to opportunities aimed at improving the quality of written feedback. Specifically, we explore faculty's receptiveness to routine metric performance reports that offer comprehensive feedback on their assessment patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online surveys were distributed to all 28 radiology faculty at Queen's University. Data were collected on demographics, feedback practices, motivations for improving the teacher-learner feedback exchange, and openness to metric performance reports and quality improvement measures. Following descriptive statistics, unpaired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to compare groups based on experience and subspecialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 89% (25/28 faculty). 56% of faculty were likely to complete evaluations after working with a resident. Regarding the degree to which faculty felt written feedback is important, 62% found it at least moderately important. A majority (67%) believed that performance reports could influence their evaluation approach, with volume of written feedback being the most likely to change. Faculty expressed interest in feedback-focused development opportunities (67%), favouring Grand Rounds and workshops.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Assessment of preceptor perceptions reveals that faculty recognize the importance of offering high-quality written feedback to learners. Faculty openness to quality improvement interventions for curricular reform relies on having sufficient time, knowledge, and skills for effective assessments. This suggests that integrating routine performance metrics into faculty assessments could serve as a catalyst for enhancing future feedback quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2357412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clues for improvement of research in objective structured clinical examination.","authors":"Jean Philippe Foy, Laure Serresse, Maxens Decavèle, Manon Allaire, Nadia Nathan, Marie Christine Renaud, Nada Sabourdin, Yasmine Souala-Chalet, Yanis Tamzali, Jessica Taytard, Mélanie Tran, Fleur Cohen, Hugo Bottemanne, Antoine Monsel","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2370617","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2370617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While objective clinical structured examination (OSCE) is a worldwide recognized and effective method to assess clinical skills of undergraduate medical students, the latest Ottawa conference on the assessment of competences raised vigorous debates regarding the future and innovations of OSCE. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive view of the global research activity on OSCE over the past decades and to identify clues for its improvement. We performed a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of OSCE papers published until March 2024. We included a description of the overall scientific productivity, as well as an unsupervised analysis of the main topics and the international scientific collaborations. A total of 3,224 items were identified from the Scopus database. There was a sudden spike in publications, especially related to virtual/remote OSCE, from 2020 to 2024. We identified leading journals and countries in terms of number of publications and citations. A co-occurrence term network identified three main clusters corresponding to different topics of research in OSCE. Two connected clusters related to OSCE performance and reliability, and a third cluster on student's experience, mental health (anxiety), and perception with few connections to the two previous clusters. Finally, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada were identified as leading countries in terms of scientific publications and collaborations in an international scientific network involving other European countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy) as well as Saudi Arabia and Australia, and revealed the lack of important collaboration with Asian countries. Various avenues for improving OSCE research have been identified: i) developing remote OSCE with comparative studies between live and remote OSCE and issuing international recommendations for sharing remote OSCE between universities and countries; ii) fostering international collaborative studies with the support of key collaborating countries; iii) investigating the relationships between student performance and anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2370617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212575/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Voices of the accelerated: key themes when considering implementation of an accelerated medical school program.","authors":"Francesco Satriale, Arianna Winchester, Michael Partin","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2385666","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2385666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this rapid communication, accelerated undergraduate medical education is examined using prior literature as well as experiences of those who have completed or are in the process of completing accelerated medical curricula. The Consortium of Accelerated Medical Pathway Programs (CAMPP) hosts an annual multi-institutional conference for all its members. During the meeting in July 2023, a virtual panel was convened from multiple constituent programs (<i>N</i> = 4) including medical students (<i>N</i> = 2), resident physicians (<i>N</i> = 4), and faculty (<i>N</i> = 2). Panel participants represented current learners or graduates from accelerated pathways of varying specialties (<i>N</i> = 5) to share firsthand experiences about acceleration to an audience representing over 25 medical schools. Five key themes were identified for accelerated students and trainees: Reduced debt as motivating factor to accelerate, Feeling prepared for residency, Ideal accelerated students are driven, Ability to form early professional relationships, and Less time for additional clinical experiences. Discourse from the CAMPP panel can inform current and developing accelerated programs at institutions looking to create or improve accelerated learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2385666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299450/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Medical education research study quality instrument: an objective instrument susceptible to subjectivity.","authors":"Scott Jaros, Gary Beck Dallaghan","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2308359","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2308359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medical education research study quality instrument (MERSQI) was designed to appraise medical education research quality based on study design criteria. As with many such tools, application of the results may have unintended consequences. This study applied the MERSQI to published medical education research identified in a bibliometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis identified highly cited articles in medical education that two authors independently evaluated using the MERSQI. After screening duplicate or non-research articles, the authors reviewed 21 articles with the quality instrument. Initially, five articles were reviewed independently and results were compared to ensure agreed upon understanding of the instrument items. The remainder of the articles were independently reviewed. Overall scores for the articles were analyzed with a paired samples t-test and individual item ratings were analyzed for inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in mean MERSQI score between reviewers. Inter-rater reliability for MERSQI items labeled response rate, validity and outcomes were considered unacceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these results there is evidence that MERSQI items can be significantly influenced by interpretation, which lead to a difference in scoring. The MERSQI is a useful guide for identifying research methodologies. However, it should not be used to make judgments on the overall quality of medical education research methodology in its current format. The authors make specific recommendations for how the instrument could be revised for greater clarity and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2308359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139547224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The 2024 French guidelines for scenario design in simulation-based education: manikin-based immersive simulation, simulated participant-based immersive simulation and procedural simulation.","authors":"Guillaume Der Sahakian, Maxime de Varenne, Clément Buléon, Guillaume Alinier, Christian Balmer, Antonia Blanié, Bertrand Bech, Anne Bellot, Hamdi Boubaker, Nadège Dubois, Francisco Guevara, Erwan Guillouet, Jean-Claude Granry, Morgan Jaffrelot, François Lecomte, Fernande Lois, Mohammed Mouhaoui, Ollivier Ortolé, Méryl Paquay, Justine Piazza, Marie Pittaco, Patrick Plaisance, Dan Benhamou, Gilles Chiniara, Etienne Rivière","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2363006","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2363006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based education in healthcare encompasses a wide array of modalities aimed at providing realistic clinical experiences supported by meticulously designed scenarios. The French-speaking Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SoFraSimS) has developed guidelines to assist educators in the design of scenarios for manikin- or simulated participant- based immersive simulation and procedural simulation, the three mainly used modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After establishing a French-speaking group of experts within the SoFraSimS network, we performed an extensive literature review with theory-informed practices and personal experiences. We used this approach identify the essential criteria for practice-based scenario design within the three simulation modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present three comprehensive templates for creating innovative scenarios and simulation sessions, each tailored to the specific characteristics of a simulation modality. The SoFraSimS templates include five sections distributed between the three modalities. The first section contextualizes the scenario by describing the practicalities of the setting, the instructors and learners, and its connection to the educational program. The second section outlines the learning objectives. The third lists all the elements necessary during the preparation phase, describing the educational method used for procedural simulation (such as demonstration, discovery, mastery learning, and deliberate practice). The fourth section addresses the simulation phase, detailing the behaviors the instructor aims to analyze, the embedded triggers, and the anticipated impact on simulation proceedings (natural feedback). This ensures maximum control over the learning experience. Finally, the fifth section compiles elements for post-simulation modifications to enhance future iterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We trust that these guidelines will prove valuable to educators seeking to implement simulation-based education and contribute to the standardization of scenarios for healthcare students and professionals. This standardization aims to facilitate communication, comparison of practices and collaboration across different learning and healthcare institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2363006"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164058/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141285019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Interprofessional education interventions for healthcare professionals to improve patient safety: a scoping review.","authors":"Yan Jiang, Yan Cai, Xue Zhang, Cong Wang","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2391631","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2391631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety incidents, such as adverse events and medical errors, are often caused by ineffective communication and collaboration. Interprofessional education is an effective method for promoting collaborative competencies and has attracted great attention in the context of patient safety. However, the effectiveness of interprofessional education interventions on patient safety remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to synthesize existing studies that focused on improving patient safety through interprofessional education interventions for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases, including Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL (via EBSCO), Scopus and Web of Science, were last searched on 20 December 2023. The search records were independently screened by two researchers. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies was used for quality appraisal. The data were extracted by two researchers and cross-checked. Finally, a narrative synthesis was performed. The protocol for this scoping review was not registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen quasi-experimental studies with moderate methodological quality were included. The results revealed that the characteristics of current interprofessional education interventions were diverse, with a strong interest in simulation-based learning strategies and face-to-face delivery methods. Several studies did not assess the reduction in patient safety incidents involving adverse events or medical errors, relying instead on the improvements in healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude or practice related to patient safety issues. Less than half of the studies examined team performance, based primarily on the self-evaluation of healthcare professionals and observer-based evaluation. There is a gap in applying newer tools such as peer evaluation and team-based objective structured clinical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional evidence on interprofessional education interventions for improving patient safety is needed by further research, especially randomized controlled trials. Facilitating simulation-based interprofessional education, collecting more objective outcomes of patient safety and selecting suitable tools to evaluate teamwork performance may be the focus of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2391631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is medical training solely to blame? Generational influences on the mental health of our medical trainees.","authors":"Shireen Suliman, Margaret Allen, Tawanda Chivese, Angelique E de Rijk, Richard Koopmans, Karen D Könings","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2329404","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10872981.2024.2329404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The negative impact of medical training on trainee mental health continues to be a concern. Situated within a sociocultural milieu, Generation Z and Generation Y, defined by their highly involved parents and the widespread use of technology, currently dominate undergraduate and graduate medical education respectively. It is necessary to explore medical trainees' generational characteristics and job-related factors related to stress, burnout, depression, and resilience. This might provide different perspectives and potential solutions to medical trainees' mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical trainees (students and residents) from two institutions in Qatar. A self-administered online survey included measures for trainees' social media overuse, their parent's parenting style, the educational support by the clinical teacher, job (demands, control, and support), and work-life balance and their relation with their stress, burnout, depression, and resilience. Relationships were tested with multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326 medical trainees who responded, 142 (44%) trainees - 93 students and 49 residents - completed all items and were included in the analysis. Social media overuse and inability to maintain a work-life balance were associated with higher levels of stress, depression, and student burnout. Higher levels of job support were associated with lower levels of stress, depression, and resident burnout, and a higher level of resilience. Job control was associated with lower burnout levels. Parenting style was unrelated to trainees' mental health.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The two generations 'Y' and 'Z' dominating current medical training showed more stress-related complaints when there is evidence of social media overuse and failure to maintain a work-life balance, while job support counterbalances this, whereas parenting style showed no effect. Measures to enhance medical trainees' mental health may include education about the wise use of social media, encouraging spending more quality social time, and enhancing job support and job control.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"29 1","pages":"2329404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946265/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140132896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}