{"title":"AI-Assisted Deception and the Emerging Challenge of LLMs in Forensic Psychiatry.","authors":"Jason G Roof","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250022-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250022-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI), including the large language model ChatGPT, has introduced potential new opportunities and challenges to the practice of forensic psychiatry. These powerful AI-based tools may offer substantial benefits in administrative tasks, report generation, and record summarization yet simultaneously present areas for further consideration, such as aiding evaluees in feigning psychiatric symptoms. Additional ethics and legal considerations exist regarding privacy, bias within AI models, and the introduction of fabricated or misleading AI-generated content into forensic assessments. Legislative efforts, privacy safeguards, and professional guidelines essential for responsible AI use are being developed. Forensic psychiatrists are uniquely positioned to influence responsible AI integration through education, advocacy, and development of best practices within psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144162875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Determining the Goals Toward Which Forensic Mental Health Practice Should Aspire.","authors":"Jacob M Appel","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250016-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250016-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forensic mental health professionals (FMHPs) play a crucial role in shaping legal outcomes, necessitating a clear understanding of excellence in the field. Establishing criteria for excellence depends upon first addressing key controversies, including those related to the role for advocacy inside the legal process, the extent to which FHMPs should strive for social justice outside the courtroom, and the allocation of scarce forensics resources. Resolution of these debates will, in turn, determine whether excellence stems primarily from selection or treatment. Only once a clear consensus regarding the meaning of excellence develops can aspirational goals for the professional be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143989567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases.","authors":"Melinda DiCiro, Shoba Sreenivasan","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250019-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250019-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, cognitive neuroscientist Itiel Dror developed a cognitive framework to address biases influenced by cognitive processes and external pressures in decisions made by forensic experts. Dror's model highlights how ostensibly objective data, such as toxicology or fingerprints, can be affected by bias driven by contextual, motivational, and organizational factors. Forensic mental health evaluations, often more subjective than physical forensic evidence analysis, are particularly vulnerable to these cognitive biases. Dror identified six expert fallacies, such as the belief that bias only affects unethical or incompetent practitioners, and proposed a pyramidal model showing how biases infiltrate expert decisions. This article adapts Dror's model to forensic mental health, exploring how biases influence data collection and interpretation and proposing mitigation strategies like Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E). We emphasize that mitigating cognitive biases requires structured, external strategies, as self-awareness alone is insufficient. By applying Dror's concepts and framework, we offer a practical approach to reduce biases and improve the fairness and accuracy of forensic mental health assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice.","authors":"Julie Goldenson, Stanley L Brodsky, Terry Kukor","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240123-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240123-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forensic mental health professionals are often provided with aspirational guidelines to inform their practice; however, disparities exist between what such professionals should strive to do and what they actually do. This article considers pathways to improving practice not only in terms of knowledge base but also in terms of ethics, skills, and intellectual, dispositional, and interpersonal qualities. Obstacles are identified that could prevent forensic mental health professionals from practicing at higher levels of excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Challenges and Opportunities for Forensic Mental Health in Immigration Courts.","authors":"Richard Rogers, Kamar Y Tazi","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240084-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240084-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"53 1","pages":"2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael A Norko, Susan Hatters Friedman, Jacquelyn T Coleman
{"title":"Our Thanks to Reviewers.","authors":"Michael A Norko, Susan Hatters Friedman, Jacquelyn T Coleman","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250007-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250007-25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"53 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ibrahim Yahia Z Mohammad, Neil de Laplante, Stephen Floyd Wood
{"title":"Benefits of Correctional Psychiatry Teaching and Clinical Exposure for Third-Year Medical Students.","authors":"Ibrahim Yahia Z Mohammad, Neil de Laplante, Stephen Floyd Wood","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240116-24","DOIUrl":"10.29158/JAAPL.240116-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical students have limited exposure to correctional health, and their attitudes toward inmates are understudied. We investigated medical students' attitudes toward inmates, assessing whether an intervention can improve their understanding of the correctional system and help them develop more positive attitudes toward inmates. One hundred thirty third-year medical students at the University of Ottawa attended a one-hour lecture on correctional health and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and subsequently observed a three-hour correctional telepsychiatry clinic during their clerkship psychiatry rotation. Students completed a preintervention and postintervention questionnaire that included a modified 20-item Attitudes Toward Prisoners (ATP) scale (quantitative) and feedback questions (qualitative). Of 130 students who completed the preintervention questionnaire, 106 completed the postintervention questionnaire (81.5%). Students' mean total modified ATP scores increased significantly after our intervention, from 72.8 to 78.4 (<i>p</i> <<i> </i>001). Fourteen of 20 ATP items increased significantly, reflecting greater understanding of the correctional system and more positive attitudes toward inmates. Thematic analysis of qualitative feedback revealed students gained a better understanding of the correctional system and increased comfort treating inmates. Scarce criticism included minimal interactivity and a desire for more sessions. Although students perceived benefits, further research is required to determine its educational significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143426458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Applying AAPL Ethics and Mission in Forensic Treatment.","authors":"Charles C Dike","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.250001-25","DOIUrl":"10.29158/JAAPL.250001-25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increased visibility of the patients' rights movement in medicine in recent years has left the erroneous impression that patients and their physicians are on equal footing in the physician-patient relationship. The reality is that vulnerability of patients in this relationship leaves them at the mercy of health care professionals. This is most acute in psychiatry, where patients reveal aspects of their inner being to their psychiatrist, including strange beliefs they would never disclose to their closest friends and family members, whereas psychiatrists, in contrast, reveal close to nothing of themselves to patients. Additionally, distortions of reality can strip patients of social mores and basic humanity and sometimes cause them to commit crimes. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) scholars have espoused the values of treating evaluees professionally and with compassion and respect while upholding their dignity and humanity. These worthy forensic psychiatric writings, however, have unfortunately not always transitioned into the clinical treatment of forensic patients. Reports of patient abuse by staff in psychiatric hospitals, including forensic psychiatric hospitals, remain rampant. Using real-life examples, I apply forensic psychiatric ethics to patient care and offer suggestions of practices and policies that would enhance treatment of patients and decrease the potential for patient abuse in psychiatric hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143400409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hunger Strikes After Restricted Housing Reform.","authors":"Anthony Tamburello, Kerri Edelman, Rusty Reeves","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240088-24","DOIUrl":"10.29158/JAAPL.240088-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hunger strikes are a common occurrence in carceral settings accompanied by serious health risks and intensive health care utilization. A 2017 study on hunger strikes within the New Jersey Department of Corrections found these events most often occurred in a disciplinary setting. We undertook this study after a new state law, the Isolated Confinement Restriction Act (ICRA), improved conditions of confinement in part by reducing the utilization, nature, and duration of disciplinary housing. We hypothesized that ICRA would reduce the frequency of hunger strikes. Although the frequency of strikes was unchanged, the mean hunger strike duration declined from 28.9 days to 9.7 days (<i>p</i> = .034). The typical strike was modestly briefer, with the median duration before ICRA being four days and after being three days. The rate of hunger strikes greater than three days declined (from 60.3% to 45.2%; <i>p</i> = .049). There was no difference in the rate of hunger striking in disciplinary housing before or after ICRA. Although hunger strikes remain a frequently used method of protest for incarcerated persons, reform to the conditions of confinement was associated with reducing the health-related dangers and associated health care costs of these phenomena and arguably was a factor in this reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143013629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications.","authors":"Alan R Felthous, Robert M Wettstein, Jose Nassif","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240090-24","DOIUrl":"10.29158/JAAPL.240090-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bias can vitiate the quality and credibility of a mental health professional's forensic evaluations as well as scientific and scholarly contributions to the forensic process in forensic psychiatry publications. Our attention here is on this latter influence of bias, although the genres of bias identified here can as well occur in forensic practice and writings. Attention is given to multiple forms of bias in peer review: <i>ad hominem</i>, ideological, confirmatory, hindsight, the halo effect, gender, publication, conflict of (financial) interest, political, religious, nationality or country of origin, esthetic or linguistic, racial or ethnicity, and herding. No doubt much bias in peer review goes undetected and no absolute purification process exists. Nonetheless, as with almost any problem, the first step toward a remedy is recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143400410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}