Modern Law Review最新文献_第2页

Still No(,) More Bolam Please: McCulloch and others v Forth Valley Health Board 仍然没有（，）更多的博勒姆请：麦库洛克等人诉福斯河谷卫生局

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12909

Clark Hobson

{"title":"Still No(,) More Bolam Please: McCulloch and others v Forth Valley Health Board","authors":"Clark Hobson","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12909","url":null,"abstract":"McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board concerned an allegation of negligence, in failing to consider treating pericarditis with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs as a reasonable alternative treatment and not discussing this option with the patient. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board held that a medical professional must disclose to a patient material risks and any reasonable alternative treatments. The materiality of a risk is to be decided by reference to a reasonable person in the patient's position, or where the medical professional should be reasonably aware that the particular patient is likely to attach significance to that risk. However, Montgomery did not define the legal standard relating to the assessment of whether an alternative treatment is reasonable. McCulloch held the correct legal test to be applied as to whether an alternative treatment is reasonable is the professional‐practice test in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. There are practical, doctrinal and normative reasons to question whether Bolam is the correct legal test in respect of the assessment of reasonable alternative treatments. Additionally, the conceptualisation of Bolam in McCulloch is overly deferential. McCulloch fails to fully consider Montgomery’s emphasis that autonomy‐respecting principles are the values that risk disclosure practices are sensitive to.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141548199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Gambling Control in a Cost‐of‐Living Crisis: An Analysis of the White Paper High Stakes: Gambling Reform for the Digital Age (2023) 生活费用危机中的赌博管制：对白皮书《高风险》的分析：数字时代的博彩改革（2023 年）

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12904

Kate Bedford

引用次数: 0

JoseBellido and KathyBowrey, Adventures in Childhood: Intellectual Property, Imagination and the Business of Play, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, 250pp, hb, £85.00 何塞-贝利多和凯西-鲍雷，《童年历险记：知识产权、想象力和游戏商业》，剑桥，剑桥大学出版社，2022 年，250 页，平装，85.00 英镑

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12902

Luke McDonagh

引用次数: 0

Smith v Fonterra and the Climatisation of Tort Law 史密斯诉恒天然和侵权法的气候化

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12908

Sam Bookman

引用次数: 0

Does Digital Status Unlawfully Penalise EU Citizens Accessing the UK's Private Rented Sector? 数字身份是否非法惩罚了进入英国私人租赁部门的欧盟公民？

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12905

Jed Meers, Joe Tomlinson, Alice Welsh, Charlotte O'Brien

{"title":"Does Digital Status Unlawfully Penalise EU Citizens Accessing the UK's Private Rented Sector?","authors":"Jed Meers, Joe Tomlinson, Alice Welsh, Charlotte O'Brien","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12905","url":null,"abstract":"In the past few years, more than six million EU citizens living in the UK have transitioned to a new immigration status. The only evidence they have of this new status is in digital form. This group is now navigating the UK's ‘compliant environment,’ designed to deter unauthorised migration, with this new form of status. This has created an unpredictable new dynamic with serious risks of discrimination in everyday interactions, such as when people are trying to rent a property. In this article, we explore the impact of this digital‐only status by drawing on a large‐scale discrete choice experiment with private rented sector landlords, which shows that people with digital‐only immigration status are substantially penalised on the private rental market due to the form of their ID. We argue that this discrimination is not only troubling in substance but also arguably amounts to a breach of non‐discrimination and equal treatment provisions under the Withdrawal Agreement (Article 12 and Article 23 respectively). The apparent lack of effective enforcement points to the potential limits of such protections after Brexit.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141548202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Connection‐Friction Axis in Devolved Health Policy and Law‐Making in the UK: A Case Study of Organ Donation 英国下放卫生政策和法律制定中的联系-摩擦轴：器官捐赠案例研究

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12900

Ruby Reed‐Berendt, Anne‐Maree Farrell, Matthew Watkins, John Harrington

{"title":"The Connection‐Friction Axis in Devolved Health Policy and Law‐Making in the UK: A Case Study of Organ Donation","authors":"Ruby Reed‐Berendt, Anne‐Maree Farrell, Matthew Watkins, John Harrington","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12900","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the dynamics of devolved health policy and law‐making in the UK, drawing on a case study of opt‐out organ donation reform. Given that health is a significant area of devolved competence, such case studies offer the opportunity to examine both similarities and differences in approach between the four nations in the context of the UK's evolving constitutional settlement. We argue that there is a need to move away from the characterisation of the devolved health policy‐making process as being grounded in a convergence‐divergence approach, towards one that recognises the connection‐friction axis around which this process takes place. To explore this, we present findings from empirical research on opt‐out organ donation law reform. This, we suggest, demonstrates that whilst connectedness between government stakeholders, experts and advocacy groups was clearly vital in structuring the policy process, account should also be taken of how law operates not only as a medium for the playing out of political and ideological friction, but also for the achievement of connection to overcome this.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141150130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unpicking Torts: Elements, Conditions of Actionability and Standing Rules 解读侵权行为：侵权行为的要素、可诉性条件和诉讼资格规则

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12899

John Murphy

引用次数: 0

Folúkẹ́Adébísí, Decolonisation and Legal Knowledge: Reflections on Power and Possibility, Bristol, Bristol University Press, 2023, 204 pp, hb £85.99, pb £26.99 Folúkẹ́Adébísí, Decolonisation and Legal Knowledge：对权力和可能性的思考》，布里斯托尔，布里斯托尔大学出版社，2023 年，204 页，合订本 85.99 英镑，平装本 26.99 英镑。

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12895

Bhumika Billa

引用次数: 0

Universal Jurisdiction: Law out of Context 普遍管辖权：断章取义的法律

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12898

Devika Hovell, Mara Malagodi

{"title":"Universal Jurisdiction: Law out of Context","authors":"Devika Hovell, Mara Malagodi","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12898","url":null,"abstract":"Universal jurisdiction enables the prosecution of international crimes by domestic courts in the absence of any nexus between the prosecuting state and the crime charged. While the temptation is for domestic judges to proceed with ‘business as usual’ in the conduct of such trials, difficulties in the practice of universal jurisdiction reflect the importance of developing a better understanding of the distinctive communities, interests, crimes and cultures these trials are intended to serve. The exercise of universal jurisdiction is commonly regarded as a form of domestic jurisdiction exercised pursuant to a sovereign right under international law. This article invites a re‐conceptualisation of the concept of universal jurisdiction, explaining that it is not a form of domestic jurisdiction acquired based on sovereign nexus between the crime charged and the prosecuting state. Instead, it should be recognised as a form of decentralised ‘international jurisdiction’, exercised as part of a state's contribution to the enforcement of international criminal law. This re‐conceptualisation has implications for the way in which domestic courts engage with many of the challenges facing universal jurisdiction trials, including problems of community, case selection, proof and translation.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140927232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Luke DimitriosSpieker, EU Values before the Court of Justice: Foundations, Potential, Risks, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 356 pp, hb £110.00 Luke DimitriosSpieker，《法院面前的欧盟价值观》：基础、潜力、风险》，牛津，牛津大学出版社，2023 年，356 页，平装 110.00 英镑

IF 0.9 4区社会学

Modern Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12896

Tom L. Boekestein

引用次数: 0