Common Market Law Review最新文献_第2页

Book Review: De Minimis Aid Under EU Law, by Ricardo Pedro. (The Hague:T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022) 书评:《欧盟法律下的最低限度援助》，里卡多·佩德罗著。(海牙:T.M.C.Asser出版社，2022)

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023106

Anna Nowak-Salles

引用次数: 0

Editorial comments: Unfinished Brexit business: The Windsor Framework on the Northern Ireland Protocol 社论评论：英国脱欧未竟事业：北爱尔兰议定书温莎框架

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023091

引用次数: 0

National constitutional identity as a tool for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal order: Costello v. The Government of Ireland 国家宪法认同作为保护欧盟法律秩序自治的工具:科斯特洛诉爱尔兰政府案

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023100

Ruairi O’Neill

引用次数: 0

Book Review: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the European Union: The Impact on Law and Governance, by Carmine Conte. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022) 书评:《联合国残疾人权利公约与欧盟:对法律和治理的影响》，卡迈恩·孔蒂著。(牛津:哈特出版社，2022年)

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023110

Jeffrey Miller

引用次数: 0

Lies, liability, and lawful content: Critiquing the approaches to online disinformation in the EU 谎言、责任和合法内容:批评欧盟处理网络虚假信息的方法

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023094

Ethan Shattock

{"title":"Lies, liability, and lawful content: Critiquing the approaches to online disinformation in the EU","authors":"Ethan Shattock","doi":"10.54648/cola2023094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023094","url":null,"abstract":"This article considers legislative approaches to online disinformation in the European Union (EU) and identifies how shifting approaches could undermine applicable fundamental rights standards in the disinformation field. The problem of online disinformation – and its disruptive effects on European elections – has attracted extensive scrutiny at the EU institutional and Member State level. Since 2018, Union institutions have pursued self-regulatory measures for disinformation and have explicitly refrained from including this content in the EU’s intermediary liability regime. A key justification for this approach has been that disinformation generally includes lawful content and that restrictions on lawful content may undermine the right to freedom of expression. As this article maps, however, standards are shifting in the EU legal context regarding online intermediary responsibilities to limit the dissemination of content containing disinformation. This is not only evidenced by a diverse set of Member State laws designed to address misleading electoral communications, but also in several provisions of the Digital Services Act (DSA) which have potential applications in this area. Drawing from relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), this article provides a distillation of key European standards regarding how EU and Member State laws to combat disinformation must ensure compatibility with the right to freedom of expression. This article further considers whether – in light of these standards – divergent legislative approaches to online disinformation in the EU could undermine fundamental rights.\u0000Disinformation, Freedom of Expression, CFR, Free Elections, Democracy","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135761993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Responsive Human Rights: Vulnerability, Ill-treatment and the ECtHR, by Corina Heri. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021) 书评:《积极响应的人权:脆弱性、虐待和欧洲人权理事会》，科瑞娜·赫里著。(牛津:哈特出版社，2021年)

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023112

Natasa Mavronicola

引用次数: 0

Ties that bind and ties that compel: Dependency and the Ruiz Zambrano doctrine 捆绑与强迫的纽带:依附与鲁伊斯·桑布拉诺学说

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023092

Fulvia Ristuccia

{"title":"Ties that bind and ties that compel: Dependency and the <i>Ruiz Zambrano </i>doctrine","authors":"Fulvia Ristuccia","doi":"10.54648/cola2023092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023092","url":null,"abstract":"In EU citizenship law, dependency is a pivotal concept when it comes to the rights of non-EU family members of Union citizens. Under certain circumstances, those family members may earn a derived right to reside, either because they are dependent on a Union citizen or the latter depends on them. The concept of dependency is particularly crucial in the Ruiz Zambrano doctrine, according to which Article 20 TFEU grants a derivative right to reside in the EU citizen’s home State to the non-EU family member if their departure would compel the dependent Union citizen to leave the territory of the EU as a whole, thus impinging on the substance of citizenship rights. Due to the significance of dependency in Ruiz Zambrano cases, where it triggers the application of EU law, that concept is continuously evolving. This article, therefore, aims to review the development of the notion of dependency, its intertwined dimensions – legal, financial, and emotional – highlighting the differences in the degree of dependency expected in free movement (when required) and in Ruiz Zambrano cases, and the increasingly divergent role of fundamental rights in the appraisal of dependency for children and adults.\u0000EU citizenship law, dependency, Ruiz Zambrano doctrine, third-country nationals, free movement law","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135762007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Balancing restrictive measures and media freedom: RT France v. Council 平衡限制措施和媒体自由:RT法国诉理事会

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023096

Viktor Szép, Ramses Wessel

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Legal Certainty in the Preliminary Reference Procedure: The Role of Extra-Legal Steadying Factors., by John Cotter. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022) 书评:初步参考程序中的法律确定性:法外稳定因素的作用。，约翰·科特著。(切尔滕纳姆:爱德华·埃尔加，2022年)

2区社会学

Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.54648/cola2023103

Lucía López Zurita

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Contract Modifications in EU Procurement Law, by Piotr Bogdanowicz. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021) 书评:《欧盟采购法中的合同修改》，作者:Piotr Bogdanowicz(切尔滕纳姆:爱德华·埃尔加，2021年)