Olli Kurkela, Jorma Lahtela, Martti Arffman, Leena Forma
{"title":"Infrared Thermography Compared to Standard Care in the Prevention and Care of Diabetic Foot: A Cost Analysis Utilizing Real-World Data and an Expert Panel.","authors":"Olli Kurkela, Jorma Lahtela, Martti Arffman, Leena Forma","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S396137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S396137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive technology for screening and early detection of diabetic foot. Real-world data and the Delphi technique were used to assess IRT's potential effect on typical care pathways of diabetic foot and their costs in the Finnish healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most typical care pathways of diabetic foot were identified from national healthcare registers from 2011 to 2017. The effect of IRT in terms of avoidable care episodes was assessed by a Delphi panel including Finnish diabetic foot specialists (n=13). By combining a series of decision-analytic models, the IRT's potential effect on the costs of each pathway and their sensitivity to model assumptions were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypothetical annual savings were estimated to be EUR ~1.7 million (EUR ~1.3 million-EUR ~2.5 million), constituting approximately 20% of the total annual care pathway costs examined. In the longer and more complex pathways, the application of IRT was estimated to result in notable savings while in the shorter pathways, IRT could increase costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modeling suggests that IRT could potentially reduce costs in a Finnish healthcare setting. Given our analysis, generation of robust evidence on the effectiveness of recent IRT technologies with up-to-date protocols seems appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/8b/ceor-15-111.PMC9968423.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10818316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Real-World Evidence of Aripiprazole Tablets with Sensor: Treatment Patterns and Impacts on Psychiatric Healthcare Resource Utilization.","authors":"Dusica Hadzi Boskovic, Shuting Liang, Purva Parab, Emily Wiggins, Joshua N Liberman","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S402357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S402357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Maintaining adherence to antipsychotic (AP) medication is often challenging. Aripiprazole tablets with sensor (AS) contain an ingestible event marker and communicate with wearable patches and a smartphone app to provide objective medication ingestion data. This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns of AS usage and its impact on psychiatric healthcare resource utilization (HCRU).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational cohort study identified individuals who initiated AS between 1/1/2019 and 6/30/2020 with 3 months baseline and 6 months of follow-up data using a commercial medical and pharmacy claims database (Clarivate). Controls were propensity score-matched (4:1) to AS initiators based on age (±2 years), sex, diagnosis (major depressive disorder [MDD], schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder [BP-I], other), insurance, and baseline oral AP use (yes/no). Days of AP supply were evaluated using a general regression model. The frequency of psychiatric HCRU during follow-up was compared between groups using a zero-inflated regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most AS initiators were diagnosed with MDD (61.2%) and were women (61.2%); mean age was 37.7 years (standard deviation: 14.1). Most AS initiators (53.1%) continued treatment for >60 days (mean days of supply = 77). After adjusting for covariates, AS initiators had 41% more days of AP supply during follow-up compared with controls (<i>P</i> <0.0001) and significantly lower adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for psychiatric outpatient visits (adjusted OR = 0.80; <i>P</i> <0.05), emergency department visits (adjusted OR = 0.11; <i>P</i> <0.05), inpatient visits (adjusted OR = 0.42; <i>P</i> <0.05), and other medical services (adjusted OR = 0.25; <i>P</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants who implemented AS had significantly more days of AP supply and fewer psychiatric care visits. These preliminary results suggest AS usage can help build regular medication-taking habits and holds promise for reducing psychiatric HCRU. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to inform clinical practice and coverage decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/38/ceor-15-487.PMC10292208.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9727120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence.","authors":"George J Wan, John Niewoehner, Kyle Hayes","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S410082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S410082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acthar<sup>®</sup> Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical and economic findings among 9 indications: infantile spasms (IS), multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), ocular inflammatory diseases (primarily uveitis and severe keratitis), symptomatic sarcoidosis, and proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Key studies of clinical efficacy and healthcare resource utilization and cost from 1956 to 2022 are discussed. Evidence supports the efficacy of RCI across all 9 indications. RCI is recommended as first-line treatment for IS and is associated with improved outcomes for the other 8 indications, including increased recovery rates in MS relapse; improved disease control in RA, SLE, and DM/PM; real-world effectiveness in patients with uveitis and severe keratitis; improved lung function and reduced corticosteroid use in symptomatic sarcoidosis; and increased rates of partial remission of proteinuria in NS. For many indications, RCI may improve clinical outcomes during exacerbations or when conventional treatments have failed to show a benefit. RCI is also associated with a reduction in the use of biologics, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Economic data suggest RCI is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for MS relapse, RA, and SLE. Other economic benefits have been demonstrated for IS, MS relapses, RA, SLE, and DM/PM, including reduced hospitalizations, lengths of stay, inpatient and outpatient services, and emergency department visits. RCI is considered safe and effective and features economic benefits for numerous indications. Its ability to control relapse and disease activity makes RCI an important nonsteroid treatment option that could help preserve functioning and well-being among patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/2f/ceor-15-499.PMC10312382.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9737071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing the Cost and Resource Use Impact of Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Shocks in the UK CareLink Population.","authors":"Jennifer Llewellyn, Erin Barker, Catherine Bowe, Natalie Hallas, Ralphael Oghagbon, Archana Rao","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S403712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S403712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High voltage devices (implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators referred to jointly as ICDs) reduce rates of sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, shocks from ICDs may be associated with healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs. The aim of this study was to estimate the costs associated with both appropriate and inappropriate shocks from ICDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with appropriate and inappropriate shocks from ICDs were identified via CareLink data from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital between March 2017 and March 2019. The devices were SmartShock activated, with anti-tachycardia pacing. Costs were estimated according to the dominant episode of healthcare, from an NHS payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2445 patients on the CareLink system with ICDs. Over the two-year period, HCRU data from 143 shock episodes among 112 patients were reported. The total cost for all shocks was £252,552 with mean costs of £1608 and £2795 for appropriate and inappropriate shocks respectively. There was substantial variation in HCRU between shock episodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there was a low rate of inappropriate shocks from ICDs, there were still substantial HCRU and costs incurred. In this study, the specific HCRU was not costed independently, meaning the costs reported are likely to be a conservative estimate. Whilst every attempt to reduce shocks should be made, appropriate shocks cannot be avoided. Strategies to reduce the incidence of inappropriate and unnecessary shocks should be implemented to reduce overall health care costs associated with ICDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/fa/ceor-15-425.PMC10257399.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9612296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Erratum: Cost-Effectiveness of Humidified High-Flow Therapy (HHFT) for COPD Patients on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy [Corrigendum].","authors":"","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S420449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S420449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S400739.].</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/28/ceor-15-331.PMC10198267.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9505538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chisato Izumi, Rei Matsuyama, Kaoru Yamabe, Kosuke Iwasaki, Tomomi Takeshima, Shannon M E Murphy, Lida Teng, Ataru Igarashi
{"title":"In-Hospital Outcomes of Heart Failure Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: Insights from Real-World Claims Data.","authors":"Chisato Izumi, Rei Matsuyama, Kaoru Yamabe, Kosuke Iwasaki, Tomomi Takeshima, Shannon M E Murphy, Lida Teng, Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S405079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S405079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a serious public health burden that is rapidly increasing in the aging population. Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a known etiology of heart failure (HF); however, the impact of VHD on outcomes of patients with HF has not been well-studied in Japan. This study aimed to determine the rates of VHD in Japanese patients admitted for HF and explore associations of VHD with in-hospital outcomes through a claim-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed claims data from 86,763 HF hospitalizations (January 2017 through December 2019) from the Medical Data Vision database. Common etiologies of HF were examined, then hospitalizations were categorized into those with VHD and those without. Covariate-adjusted models were used to explore the association of VHD with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and medical cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 86,763 hospitalizations for HF, 13,183 had VHD and 73,580 did not. VHD was the second most frequent etiology of HF (15.2%). The most frequent type of VHD was mitral regurgitation (36.4% of all hospitalizations with VHD), followed by aortic stenosis (33.7%) and aortic regurgitation (16.4%). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between hospitalizations with VHD vs those without (9.0% vs 8.9%; odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.01 [0.95-1.08]; p=0.723). Hospitalizations with VHD were associated with significantly longer length of stay (26.1 vs 24.8 days; incident rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.05 [1.03-1.07]; p<0.001) and higher medical costs (1536 vs 1195 thousand yen; rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.25-1.32]; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VHD was a frequent etiology of HF that was associated with significant medical resource use. Future studies are needed to investigate whether timely VHD treatment could reduce HF progression and its associated healthcare resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/10/ceor-15-349.PMC10202112.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9516290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Harpreet Singh, Liam Wilson, Tom Tencer, Jinender Kumar
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Dose Escalation and Treatment Switching in Ulcerative Colitis.","authors":"Harpreet Singh, Liam Wilson, Tom Tencer, Jinender Kumar","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S391413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S391413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently approved biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis have well-established efficacy. However, many patients fail to respond or lose response, leading to dose escalation or treatment switching.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to identify real-world evidence on dose escalation and treatment switching and associated clinical and economic outcomes among adults with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE (up to 26 August 2020), and conference proceedings (2017-2020) for studies in adults with ulcerative colitis to assess clinical response and remission, colectomy, adverse events, and economic outcomes related to dose escalation and treatment switching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 56 studies, dose escalation and treatment switching involving infliximab and/or adalimumab were most frequently investigated. Rates of clinical response after dose escalation were 20-95% (1.8-36 months), clinical remission rates were 10-94% (1.8-36 months), colectomy rates were 0-33% (12-38 months), and adverse event rates were 0-18%. Treatment switching rates in 21 studies were 4-70% over 3-62 months, with switch due to loss of response rates of 4-35% over 12-62 months (7 studies). Up to 35% of patients underwent colectomy 12-120 weeks after switching, and 13-38% experienced adverse events. Data relating to economic outcomes were limited to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but demonstrated increased direct costs associated with both dose escalation and treatment switching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose escalation and treatment switching are common with existing therapies. However, clinical response and remission rates vary, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve optimal clinical and economic outcomes. This highlights the need for more efficacious and durable treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/e7/ceor-15-125.PMC9968424.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10818319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
María Presa, David Vicente, Antonio Calles, Laura Salinas-Ortega, Jaesh Naik, Luis F García, Javier Soto
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain.","authors":"María Presa, David Vicente, Antonio Calles, Laura Salinas-Ortega, Jaesh Naik, Luis F García, Javier Soto","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S415711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S415711","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of lorlatinib compared to alectinib and brigatinib for the treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously not treated, in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model comprised progression free, non-intracranial progression, intracranial progression, and death health states was constructed to estimate the total costs, life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accumulated in a lifetime horizon. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for lorlatinib were obtained from the CROWN study. For alectinib and brigatinib, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to estimate OS and PFS hazard ratios versus crizotinib. Utilities were estimated based on EQ-5D-5L data derived from the CROWN (lorlatinib), ALEX (alectinib) and ALTA-1L (brigatinib) studies. According to the Spanish National Health Service perspective the total costs (expressed in euros using a 2021 cost year) included drug acquisition and the administration's subsequent treatment, ALK+ advanced NSCLC management and adverse-event management, and palliative care. Unitary costs were obtained from local cost databases and literature. Costs, LYGs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the model's robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lorlatinib provided higher health outcomes (+0.70 LYG/patient, +1.42 QALYs/patient) and lower costs (-€9239/patient) than alectinib. Lorlatinib yielded higher LYG (+1.74) and QALYs (+2.30) versus brigatinib but higher costs/patient (+€36,627), resulting in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of €15,912/QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that lorlatinib may be a dominant treatment option versus alectinib. Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000/QALY, lorlatinib may be an efficient option compared to brigatinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/22/ceor-15-659.PMC10494862.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10589599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Richard F Pollock, Andreas K Slættanes, Henrik Brandi, Tobias Sydendal Grand
{"title":"A Cost-Utility Analysis of SQ<sup>®</sup> Tree SLIT-Tablet versus Placebo in the Treatment of Birch Pollen Allergic Rhinitis from a Swedish Societal Perspective.","authors":"Richard F Pollock, Andreas K Slættanes, Henrik Brandi, Tobias Sydendal Grand","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S377399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S377399","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E antibody-mediated inflammatory condition that arises in response to inhaled allergens such as pollen. Pollens from trees in the birch homologous group are the most common allergenic tree pollens in Northern and Central Europe and North America. SQ® Tree SLIT-Tablet (ITULAZAX®) is a sublingual immunotherapy tablet indicated for moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group. The present analysis evaluated the cost-utility of treating adults with AR with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet versus placebo, both in combination with symptom-relieving medications, from a Swedish societal perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model was developed to evaluate changes in cost and quality of life associated with using SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet relative to placebo in an adult population of individuals with AR. The model captured costs associated with symptom-relieving medications, healthcare professional interactions, SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet, and indirect costs arising from absenteeism and reduced workplace productivity. The analysis was conducted over 10 years with costs captured in 2021 Swedish Krona (SEK) and future costs and effects discounted at 3% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment with SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet resulted in an improvement of 0.041 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 10 years versus placebo. From a Swedish societal perspective, costs increased by SEK 9077 over the same period, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of SEK 223,445 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was most sensitive to assumptions around the disease-modifying effect of SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SQ Tree SLIT-Tablet improved quality of life in moderate-to-severe AR and/or conjunctivitis induced by pollen from the birch homologous group in Sweden, with only a modest increase in societal costs over a medium-term time horizon, representing good value for money at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK 700,000 per QALY.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/a0/ceor-15-69.PMC9904213.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10688922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Donna Punch, Jonathan S Davis, Rebecca Hahn, Rav Gill, Chia-Wen Hsiao, Richard Kara
{"title":"Comprehensive Custom-Pak<sup>®</sup> in Cataract and Vitreoretinal Surgery in Canadian Hospitals: Time and Budget Impact Analysis.","authors":"Donna Punch, Jonathan S Davis, Rebecca Hahn, Rav Gill, Chia-Wen Hsiao, Richard Kara","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S397671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S397671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgical procedure packs are commonly used in ophthalmological surgeries, but quantitative evidence demonstrating the time efficiency and economic impact of their use is limited. Evaluating the time and cost of surgical pack use is particularly important for publicly funded healthcare systems with tight budgets and/or an emphasis on value-based care. This study sought to estimate the economic impact of comprehensive surgical pack use in cataract and vitreoretinal (retina) surgeries across operating room (OR), materials management, and accounting departments in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A budget impact model developed for the United States (US) from a self-reported cross-sectional study was adapted for Canada. The US study obtained data via an online survey and timing exercises of surgical procedures. The model was adapted using relevant Canadian-specific labor and cost inputs. Use of generic commodity packs (no proprietary equipment-specific supplies) was compared to full utilization of Custom-Pak<sup>®</sup>, a comprehensive pack (disposables plus equipment-specific supplies) in cataract and retina surgeries at the facility and aggregate group (provincewide) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Switching from generic to comprehensive pack use in all 2500 cataract procedures at a community hospital saves 287 labor hours per year, primarily in the materials management department. Surgery preparation (OR) hours saved allow for an additional 196 potential procedures annually. Most of the Canadian Dollar (CAD) $39,815 annual cost savings are realized for the OR. Aggregating across 50,000 cataract surgeries at the provincial level yields savings of 5608 hours and 3916 additional procedures, translating to hidden cost reductions of CAD$790,632 annually. Implementing full Custom-Pak use at the facility level in 1000 retina cases saves $10,650 annually; provincewide, 127 potential additional procedures can be gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive Custom-Pak use improves efficiency in cataract and retina surgeries saving substantial time and cost in Canadian hospitals, potentially allowing more patients to have these procedures, and reducing wait times.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/79/ceor-15-151.PMC9985892.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9084552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}