Social Work Research最新文献_第7页

Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes about Human Trafficking Questionnaire: Extending Its Utility with Social Work Students 关于人口贩卖的认知、知识与态度问卷:在社工学生中扩展其效用

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI: 10.1093/SWR/SVAB018

Chiquitia L. Welch-Brewer, Maura Nsonwu, N. Busch-Armendariz, Laurie Cook Heffron

引用次数: 1

How Many Immigrant-Friendly Communities Are in the United States? Classifying the Policy Stream 美国有多少对移民友好的社区?对策略流进行分类

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI: 10.1093/SWR/SVAB021

Richard J. Smith, Catherine E. Schmitt-Sands

引用次数: 2

When Families Fail: Women’s Responses to Spousal Violence in Central Asia 当家庭失败:中亚妇女对配偶暴力的反应

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI: 10.1093/SWR/SVAB017

Jildyz Urbaeva, Jinhee Koo, Saltanat Childress

引用次数: 0

Developmental Disabilities in the Context of Fragile Families: Racial and Ethnic Disparities at Age Nine 脆弱家庭背景下的发育障碍:九岁儿童的种族差异

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI: 10.1093/SWR/SVAB022

Kristina Lopez, Hyunsu Oh

引用次数: 0

Resilience, Growth, and Posttraumatic Symptoms among Social Workers Who Are “Doubly Exposed” “双重暴露”社会工作者的恢复力、成长和创伤后症状

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI: 10.1093/SWR/SVAB016

Michal Finklestein, A. Laufer

引用次数: 3

Addressing the Global Inequality in Social Work Research: Challenges, Opportunities, and Key Insights and Strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa 解决社会工作研究中的全球不平等:撒哈拉以南非洲的挑战、机遇、关键见解和战略

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svab020

D. Hodge, Kasule Kibirige

引用次数: 2

Making AIMS Explicit: Establishing Intersectionality Criteria for Gender Equity Analyses 明确目标:建立性别平等分析的交叉性标准

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svab013

Sara Goodkind, Rachel E. Gartner, L. Jacobs, Dominique Branson, Jorden King, Siera Meaux, Elizabeth Miller

{"title":"Making AIMS Explicit: Establishing Intersectionality Criteria for Gender Equity Analyses","authors":"Sara Goodkind, Rachel E. Gartner, L. Jacobs, Dominique Branson, Jorden King, Siera Meaux, Elizabeth Miller","doi":"10.1093/swr/svab013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svab013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Social work researchers often conduct population-level analyses of equity, sometimes focusing on how social and economic well-being are differently experienced depending on gender. In response to the United States’ refusal to ratify the United Nations’ Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, city-level campaigns began conducting gender equity analyses to highlight and address inequality. To date, these analyses have largely focused on gender alone, affording little attention to other axes of inequality. This article argues that theories of intersectionality offer a conceptual antidote to this narrow focus on gender. Drawing on extant literature, authors developed four criteria to guide intersectional gender equity analyses: (1) analyzes power, (2) interprets population and phenomena in context, (3) mutually constituted and interdependent category use, and (4) strategic and transparent social justice goals (which can be abbreviated as AIMS). Taking a metaevaluation approach, they applied the AIMS criteria to assess existing gender equity analyses. Results indicate ways in which these criteria can be met and the implications of taking intersectional approaches. Ultimately, the AIMS criteria offer guidance to social work research that can systematically and intentionally integrate core intersectionality principles and, in turn, support efforts to promote equity in our systems and institutions.","PeriodicalId":47282,"journal":{"name":"Social Work Research","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86617770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Attuning and Queering SAMHSA’s Strategic Prevention Framework 调整和调整SAMHSA的战略预防框架

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svab012

N. Mendoza, Cynthia Mackey, Vern Harner, K. Jackson

引用次数: 1

Crossing Borders: Exploring the Role of School Social Workers in Immigrant-Serving Schools 跨界:探讨学校社工在移民服务学校中的角色

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svab011

L. V. Sosa, Benjamin J. Roth, S. Rodriguez

引用次数: 4

Operationalizing Intersectionality in Social Work Research: Approaches and Limitations 社会工作研究中交叉性的操作化:方法与局限

IF 1.7 3区社会学

Social Work Research Pub Date : 2021-08-21 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svab010

S. Matsuzaka, Kimberly D. Hudson, A. Ross

{"title":"Operationalizing Intersectionality in Social Work Research: Approaches and Limitations","authors":"S. Matsuzaka, Kimberly D. Hudson, A. Ross","doi":"10.1093/swr/svab010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svab010","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Despite intersectionality’s relevance to social work, scholars have raised concerns that its misguided applications place it “in danger of being co-opted, depoliticized, and diluted.” This scoping review examined the use of intersectionality in empirical social work research, specific to the extent, contexts, and degree of responsibility with which it has been applied. Using the search term convention [“social work” OR “social services”] AND [“intersectional” OR “intersectionality”], 22 databases were searched for peer-reviewed research published between 2009 and 2019, yielding 153 articles. The 33 studies meeting inclusion criteria were examined according to two frameworks: (1) typologies for intersectional conceptual approach and (2) intersectionality responsible use guidelines (RUG). Most studies used an intracategorical approach (n = 24), while fewer used an intercategorical (n = 7) or a mixed intra- and intercategorical approach (n = 2). On average, studies met approximately half of the RUG. Studies most frequently (n = 29) aligned with the guideline “Recommend ways to promote positive social transformation and justice through research, teaching, and practice.” Studies least frequently (n = 3) conformed to the guideline “Credits Black feminist activist roots of intersectionality.” Responsible stewardship is recommended to address power in knowledge production, researcher positionalities, and social justice action.","PeriodicalId":47282,"journal":{"name":"Social Work Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85292716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6