Feminist Theory最新文献_第9页

Crashing bodies: towards an intersectional assemblage theory of domestic violence 碰撞的尸体:走向家庭暴力的交叉组合理论

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI: 10.1177/14647001211014764

Paddy Farr

引用次数: 2

Abolition of the family: the most infamous feminist proposal 废除家庭：最臭名昭著的女权主义提案

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1177/14647001211015841

Kathi Weeks

引用次数: 13

Rape and social death 强奸和社会性死亡

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI: 10.1177/14647001211012940

Bonnie Mann

{"title":"Rape and social death","authors":"Bonnie Mann","doi":"10.1177/14647001211012940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001211012940","url":null,"abstract":"Rape that does not involve life-threatening physical violence, is committed by someone known to the victim, and is not reported to law enforcement (called, here, commonplace rape) raises two questions: “Why didn't she fight back or run away?” and “Why didn't she say anything at the time?” Recently, research on “tonic immobility,” based on animal predation studies, has provided a physiological explanation for experiences of immobilization during sexual assault. The juxtaposition of animal predation with commonplace sexual assault raises the question: How is it that a response reserved, in animals, for lethal, no-way-out scenarios is present in modes of violation where the victim does not report fear of death or extreme physical harm? Neither does this research help explain why women fail to report. This philosophical exploration of the meaning of tonic immobility in sexual assault helps to justify the juxtaposition of life-or-death scenarios with less-than-life-threatening violation, and sheds light on the reason for women's silence after sexual assault. Rape is accompanied by deep historical meanings that can be encapsulated in the notion of “social death,” associated in the U.S. with colonial conquest, enslavement, and impoverishment. The specter of social death haunts commonplace rape, producing life or death responses.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"24 1","pages":"377 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14647001211012940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46659390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Women’s ‘exchange’ in Western and Amerindian societies: a feminist critique of perspectival anthropology 西方和美洲印第安人社会中的女性“交换”：透视人类学的女性主义批判

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-27 DOI: 10.1177/14647001211009006

Romina Wainberg

引用次数: 1

Antigone re-imagined: uprooted women’s political narratives Antigone重新想象：被连根拔起的女性政治叙事

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI: 10.1177/14647001211005298

Maria Tamboukou

引用次数: 0

Remembering Simone de Beauvoir’s ‘ethics of ambiguity’ to challenge contemporary divides: feminism beyond both sex and gender 记住西蒙娜·德·波伏娃的“模糊伦理”，挑战当代的分歧:超越性别和性别的女权主义

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1464700120988641

L. Nicholas

{"title":"Remembering Simone de Beauvoir’s ‘ethics of ambiguity’ to challenge contemporary divides: feminism beyond both sex and gender","authors":"L. Nicholas","doi":"10.1177/1464700120988641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988641","url":null,"abstract":"This article returns to Simone de Beauvoir’s philosophical oeuvre in order to offer a way of thinking beyond contemporary feminist divisions created by ‘gender critical’ or trans-exclusionary feminists. The ‘gender critical’ feminist position returns to sex essentialism to argue for ‘abolishing’ gender, while opponents often appeal to proliferated gender self-identities. I argue that neither goes far enough and that they both circumscribe utopian visions for a world beyond both sex and gender. I chart how Beauvoir’s ontological, ethical and political positions can be used to overcome the material/cultural, sex/gender bind that the contemporary divide perpetuates. I outline Beauvoir’s ‘ambiguous’ non-foundational ontology that attends to both the cultural origins, and material effects, of both sex and gender, and to the extent that humyns are fundamentally social. After outlining Beauvoir’s definition of freedom as purposive action, I then outline how the existence of the humyn-made and intersubjectively-upheld ‘situations’ of both sex and gender delimit this, urging feminists to return to the lost question of eradicating both. I use the utopian impulse in Beauvoir to argue that an ethics of reciprocity is an alternative mode of understanding the self and others. Beauvoir also calls for a political strategy that I call a ‘utopian realism’ that I apply to the contemporary divide. A way forward that is attentive to the concerns of both positions is the pragmatic use of identity politics that is nonetheless mindful of identity’s limits, alongside Beauvoir’s proto-intersectional vision of solidarity politics based not on identity but on a position of alterity and shared political strategy. Ultimately, I use this to argue that feminism would do better to unite around a shared commitment to challenging alterity, rather than further contributing to it.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"226 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700120988641","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42058717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Queer parents, gendered embodiment and the de-essentialisation of motherhood 古怪的父母、性别化的化身和母性的去本质化

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1464700121989226

K. Averett

{"title":"Queer parents, gendered embodiment and the de-essentialisation of motherhood","authors":"K. Averett","doi":"10.1177/1464700121989226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700121989226","url":null,"abstract":"Feminist theorists have long looked to motherhood and mothering behaviour as an important site at which to examine women’s lives, gender inequality and the social construction of gendered institutions. One important line of theorisation has concerned itself with the de-essentialisation of motherhood, a project that I argue remains incomplete, as feminist theorisation of motherhood naturalises biological sex and therefore essentialises mothering as behaviour performed by ‘female bodies’ and fathering behaviour as performed by ‘male bodies’. Using two cases from a larger qualitative interview project with LGBTQ parents, I show that current theories of motherhood fail to have explanatory power in cases – such as gay and transgender parents – when gendered embodiment and mothering (and/or fathering) fail to align as expected. I suggest that research related to queer parenting – particularly research on gay male co-parenting, on the experiences of transgender parents and their children, on non-white LGBTQ parents and on mothering from outside the nuclear family – will be especially fruitful in moving the de-essentialisation of mothering in new directions that will further contest heteronormative, cisnormative and nuclear assumptions about the family.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"284 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700121989226","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46858718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

Feminist diagrams 女权主义图表

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1464700121997182

Sam Mcbean

{"title":"Feminist diagrams","authors":"Sam Mcbean","doi":"10.1177/1464700121997182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700121997182","url":null,"abstract":"On 4 January 1971, Ti-Grace Atkinson delivered a talk entitled ‘Strategy and Tactics: A Presentation of Political Lesbianism’. The talk was later published in her collected essays, Amazon Odyssey. The essay contains thirty-five diagrams: ten ‘Strategy Charts’, three ‘Tactical Charts’ and twenty-two ‘Tactical-Strategy Charts’, which map a strategy of the ‘Oppressor’ (men) and the tactics that the ‘Oppressed’ (women) might develop to lead to a revolution – lesbians, significantly, are the ‘Buffer Zone’ between these two classes. In the only reference I have managed to find to these diagrams, they are referred to as ‘crazy’. This article re-visits these diagrams, exploring the role of the diagram in how Atkinson attempts to map patriarchal relations and also imagine a feminist revolution. Taking Atkinson’s diagrams as a starting point, the article then uses them to begin to narrate a genealogy of the diagram in feminist theory, exploring a diagrammatic imaginary that is an often-used but rarely discussed tactic in feminist writing. Finally, the article opens out to consider how this history of feminist diagrams might be a precursor to more contemporary feminist data visualisations.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"206 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700121997182","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46205400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Introduction: ‘Remembering Feminist Theory Forward’ 引言：“记住女权主义理论前进”

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1464700120988636

L. Nicholas, Shelley Budgeon

{"title":"Introduction: ‘Remembering Feminist Theory Forward’","authors":"L. Nicholas, Shelley Budgeon","doi":"10.1177/1464700120988636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988636","url":null,"abstract":"Fifteen years ago, Clare Hemmings demonstrated both a teleological and binary tendency in the dominant story of ‘Western’ feminist theory: ‘an insistent narrative that sees the development of [‘Western’] feminist thought as a relentless march of progress . . . [that] fixes writers and perspectives within a particular decade’ (2005: 115). This means that ‘the specificity of feminist accounts of difference, power and knowledge at all points in the recent past . . . is elided’ (Hemmings, 2005: 131). Many of us, however, have always used concepts and perspectives from a variety of purportedly bygone eras or contradictory camps. Homogenising eras or reproducing binary oppositional camps of feminisms serves to frame whole bodies of work as ‘problematic’ or outdated, and to relegate a plethora of work as irrelevant, e.g. framing the 1970s as entirely essentialist, or the 1980s as made up of only two positions in the two factions of the ‘sex wars’. Departing with the premises of Hemmings’ challenge to these typologies, then, the articles in this special issue engage with ‘classic’ or previous feminist works in nuanced ways. Sabine Sielke proposes that there is, and has been, a seriality in feminist critique, a ‘recursiveness or insistence’ (2018: 80) that, rather than being a mere return, allows for a ‘transgressive moment of repetition’ (2018: 83). We are interested in recursive use of ideas from other eras that create such transgressive moments and that in doing so may help us to think through the feminist issues of the present. For example, Cynthia Enloe recently called for a return to the concept of patriarchy that, while often framed as unfashionably structuralist, she argues is a","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"159 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700120988636","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42793999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

‘Smash the patriarchy’: the changing meanings and work of ‘patriarchy’ online “粉碎父权制”:网上“父权制”的含义和作用的变化

IF 2.1 3区社会学

Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1464700120988643

R. Hill, Kim Allen

{"title":"‘Smash the patriarchy’: the changing meanings and work of ‘patriarchy’ online","authors":"R. Hill, Kim Allen","doi":"10.1177/1464700120988643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988643","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the resurgence of the term ‘patriarchy’ in digital culture and reflects on the everyday online meanings of the term in distinction to academic theorisations. In the 1960s–1980s, feminists theorised patriarchy as the systematic oppression of women, with differing approaches to how it worked. Criticisms that the concept was unable to account for intersectional experiences of oppression, alongside the ‘turn to culture’, resulted in a fall from academic grace. However, ‘patriarchy’ has found new life through Internet memes (humorous, mutational images that circulate widely on social media). This article aims to investigate the resurgence of the term ‘patriarchy’ in digital culture. Based on an analysis of memes with the phrase ‘patriarchy’ and ‘smash the patriarchy’, we identify how patriarchy memes are used by two different online communities (feminists and anti-feminists) and consider what this means for the ongoing usefulness of the concept of patriarchy. We argue that, whilst performing important community-forming work, using the term is a risky strategy for feminists for two reasons: first, because memes are by their nature brief, there is little opportunity to address intersections of oppression; secondly, the underlying logic of feminism is omitted in favour of brevity, leaving it exposed to being undermined by the more mainstream logic of masculinism.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"165 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700120988643","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48202676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6