{"title":"Devolution, National Pluralism and the Role of the UK Supreme Court.","authors":"Josep M Tirapu-Sanuy","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf014","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article concerns the role of the UK Supreme Court in the devolution settlement. It starts by describing the approach adopted by the Supreme Court in relation to devolution cases, characterised by a style of reasoning strictly tied to the literal meaning of the statutory text, and an expansive understanding of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. The article argues that the purpose of devolution is the accommodation of national pluralism: devolution institutionalises the unique plurinational nature of the UK, accommodating the claims to self-government advanced by the UK's minority nations. This has important implications for the Supreme Court: in deciding devolution cases, the Supreme Court can contribute positively or negatively to the achievement of this purpose. I maintain that the Court ought to reason and interpret the devolution statutes in a manner which promotes the accommodation of national pluralism, moving away from the current approach. The argument is illustrated with an analysis of the <i>IndyRef2</i> judgment, in comparison with the Canadian <i>Quebec Secession Reference</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 3","pages":"640-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395232/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religious Legal Pluralism in the Shadow of the Centralistic State.","authors":"Chagai Schlesinger","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf010","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Legal pluralism is a useful framework for analysing church-state relationships. Often overlooked, legal diversity also exists <i>within</i> religions. This article examines the interactions between the two. It discusses how church-state arrangements influence the internal legal pluralism of religious systems: how religious actors' depictions of church-state arrangements impact their self-perception of internal legal diversity. Understanding these often-overlooked nuanced and complex influences has descriptive and normative significance. This argument is demonstrated by analysing a case study: the modern transformations of a hyper-pluralistic doctrine in Jewish law, named 'Kim-Li'. Modern legal centralism rendered rabbinical reluctance towards its application. The article reveals the correlation between rabbinical interpretations of the doctrine and particular assumptions and aspirations regarding church-state structures. By employing legal pluralism/law and religion classifications, the article suggests that reactions to the 'shadow of the state' are more diverse and nuanced than the current literature foresees, and concludes by suggesting its rectification.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 3","pages":"583-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Public Participation in Renaming Processes: Navigating Sir John Hawkins.","authors":"Emily Haslam, Suhraiya Jivraj","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf012","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates about whether to remove, rename or 'retain and explain' monuments, buildings and street names play an important part in contemporary disputes about the construction and meaning of history. They also contribute to a significant cultural and socio-legal reassessment of Britain's colonial and slave-trading past. We explore how two local governmental legal processes dealt with renaming controversies. More specifically, we examine the extent to which they facilitated consultation and what impact this had on local debates. In doing so, we ask how legal processes around renaming can be prefigured to generate more transformative understandings of controversial histories without further polarising the 'culture war'. This exploration shines a critical light on the role of law in debates about Britain's past and offers valuable lessons for future legal development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 3","pages":"612-639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395239/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Virtual Rape to Meta-rape: Sexual Violence, Criminal Law and the Metaverse.","authors":"Clare McGlynn, Carlotta Rigotti","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf009","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the metaverse blurs the lines between physical and virtual realms, enhanced by haptic devices providing sensory feedback, it is poised to become integral to daily life. However, this new digital frontier is also a site for sexual violence. Women users increasingly report non-consensual touching, image-based sexual abuses and novel forms of gendered harm, often trivialised and inadequately addressed by current laws. Accordingly, this article proposes the new concept and terminology of 'meta-rape' to better capture the intense and embodied nature of these forms of sexual violence. We also provide a new categorisation of experiences of sexual harassment and abuse in the metaverse, together with a comprehensive analysis of the role and application of criminal law in tackling meta-rape. We suggest, contrary to conventional approaches, that current criminal laws could apply to some forms of meta-rape. We also propose strengthening and future-proofing criminal law, with laws proscribing intimate intrusions. By reframing our understanding of meta-rape, we aim to address the prevalence and impact of these gendered and sexualised harms, providing robust avenues for victim redress and promoting safety and autonomy in emerging virtual spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 3","pages":"554-582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395229/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Doctors Behaving Badly: Professional Regulation and the Tilt Effect(s) of Public Protection Appeals.","authors":"Paula Case","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulation in healthcare has often been accused of protecting the professions and neglecting patients. 'Public protection appeals', used to challenge fitness to practise decisions considered to be 'insufficient' for the 'protection of the public', have created a welcome space for judicial scrutiny. Focusing on doctors, the present study of public protection appeals examines the contours of that scrutiny. It frames these appeals as a recalibration of the metaphorical 'regulatory bargain', finding that many of the resulting judgments signal a departure from traditional postures of 'deference' in professional regulation jurisprudence and a steady judicial assertion of jurisdiction over the core issue of 'seriousness' in doctor misconduct. Further exploration of that heightened scrutiny identifies several strands of new doctrine which fortify the regulatory regime in a variety of directions. This exploration also, however, isolates and critiques the emergence of a '<i>Bolton</i> gloss'-a seam of cases which tilt decision making towards censure and risk disrupting regulatory strategies which have cultivated a commitment to rehabilitative approaches in the disciplinary process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"476-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Theory of Annexation.","authors":"Ronit Levine-Schnur, Tamar Megiddo, Yael Berda","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acquisition of territory by force, once permitted, is strictly forbidden today. However, this normative shift has not led to a reconceptualization of annexation, which is still understood as the extension of sovereignty through formal state acts. Maintaining the requirement of formal state acts, we argue, undermines the norm and is further analytically flawed and generates a rule-of-law problem: it fails to capture instances of undeclared annexation, and incentivises states to avoid formal proclamations of annexation to evade legal consequences. This article therefore proposes a new theory of annexation. Drawing on theories of bureaucracy and administration, we suggest three qualifications for annexation: the normative organising framework with which the state manages the territory reflects a perception of the territory as part of its own; the organisational structure of control assimilates the management of the territory into the bureaucratic machinery of the state; and the symbolic performance of power erases symbolic differences between the territory and the annexing state. This reconceptualisation of annexation may support the goal of the contemporary international legal order to suppress aggressive use of force and ensure the self-determination of peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"447-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163119/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Data Entry and Decision Chains: Distributed Responsibility and Bureaucratic Disempowerment in the UK's Universal Credit Programme.","authors":"Victoria Adelmant, Jennifer Raso","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalising public programmes creates new accountability challenges, many of which are under-theorised. Using Universal Credit to illustrate its points, this article argues that the distributed infrastructures upon which digital government programmes rely create extended chains of decision-making actors. Each link along the chain is responsible for decision-making components, such as data entry and interpretation. This phenomenon has three significant effects. First, it distributes administrative responsibilities widely. Second, it 'publicises' actors previously considered 'private', by integrating companies and landlords into public decision-making processes. Third, it bureaucratically disempowers, because it makes it difficult for all actors to recognise and address errors. In some cases, it prevents them from knowing they are involved in decision-making processes at all. Drawing on public administration, socio-legal studies and public law scholarship, we reconceptualise 'administrative burden', 'bureaucratic disentitlement' and 'privatisation' to show how this distribution of responsibilities within novel 'decision chains' raises critical questions for public law.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"415-446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Defending the Integrity Principle: Necessity, Remorse and Moral Consistency in the Protest Trial.","authors":"Steven Cammiss, Graeme Hayes, Brian Doherty","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The protest trial has distinctive features and should be governed by what we term the 'integrity principle': it should respect the moral consistency of the defendant; justifications, not excuses, should be privileged; and the 'remorse principle' should not apply. As such, the trial should enable effective communication where the defendant is held to account in meaningful terms. We apply this argument to three high-profile protest trials: the Frack Free Three; the Stansted 15; and the Colston 4. Using observation data, we argue the first two trials and subsequent appellant court rulings failed to respect the integrity principle. The third case provides a contrast: the defendants maintained moral consistency, and gave an authentic and contextualised account. This was, however, at some cost of political divestment. Nevertheless, the Colston 4 trial is exceptional in a process that typically pays little operational respect to the integrity principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"329-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Retrospective Law and Release from Prison.","authors":"Rory Kelly","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article draws out two injustices to which retrospective criminal legislation may give rise: undermining accessibility of law and challenging equality before the law. It is argued that the censuring function of criminal law exacerbates both wrongs. This sets the stage for an analysis of delaying prisoners' release. It is suggested that retrospective reform in this context threatens the same values as those threatened by retrospective criminalisation. Yet, the safeguards against retrospective reform of release provisions are weak due to two important strands of case law, one concerning which penalty was 'applicable at the time' of the offence and another which draws a distinction between penalties and their execution. Both strands of case law are in need of fundamental reconsideration if article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights is to realise its purposes of upholding rule-of-law values and providing practicable safeguards.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"387-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Punitive Disentitlement Within Private Law?","authors":"Timothy Liau","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Does private law punish? Should it? I question whether private law punishes in a form other than through a court order of punitive damages, by exploring a less obvious form of punishment to which less attention has been paid-'punitive disentitlement'-wherein a person is disentitled from a legal right, defence, or other legal advantage they would and should otherwise be entitled to, because of their misconduct. Potential instances are identified and analysed in a broad survey of private law doctrine, including the laws of property, contract, unjust enrichment and torts. The strongest reason for punitive disentitlement is its immunity to a powerful normative objection to punitive damages. Punitive disentitlement is not free from difficulties, however. It inherits some of the difficulties associated with punitive damages; it also runs into a separate set of objections. We should therefore be more alert to, and cautious about, its continued use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"45 2","pages":"358-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}