Review of Philosophy and Psychology最新文献_第8页

Schizophrenic Thought Insertion and Self-Experience 精神分裂症的思想插入与自我体验

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00680-2

Darryl Mathieson

引用次数: 0

The Phenomenal Quality of Complex Experiences 复杂体验的现象性

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00676-y

P. Fazekas

引用次数: 0

Assessing the Evidence for Outcome Bias and Hindsight Bias 评估结果偏倚和后见偏倚的证据

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00672-2

Mikkel Gerken

引用次数: 1

Inner Speech and ‘Pure’ Thought – Do we Think in Language? 内心言语与“纯粹”思维——我们用语言思考吗？

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00678-w

N. Kompa

引用次数: 4

Justice before Expediency: Robust Intuitive Concern for Rights Protection in Criminalization Decisions 权宜之计之前的正义:刑事判决中对权利保护的强烈直觉关注

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00674-0

Piotr Bystranowski, I. Hannikainen

引用次数: 0

The Epistemic Innocence of Elaborated Delusions Re-Examined 重新审视复杂妄想的认识论清白

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00675-z

Maja Białek

引用次数: 0

Two Kinds of Process or Two Kinds of Processing? Disambiguating Dual-Process Theories 两种加工还是两种加工?消除双过程理论的歧义

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00673-1

Rafael Augusto

引用次数: 1

Does Cognitive Psychology Imply Pluralism About the Self? 认知心理学是否意味着关于自我的多元主义？

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-022-00671-9

Chris Register

引用次数: 0

Students Eat Less Meat After Studying Meat Ethics. 学习肉类伦理后，学生少吃肉。

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0

Eric Schwitzgebel, Bradford Cokelet, Peter Singer

{"title":"Students Eat Less Meat After Studying Meat Ethics.","authors":"Eric Schwitzgebel, Bradford Cokelet, Peter Singer","doi":"10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0","url":null,"abstract":"In the first controlled, non-self-report studies to show an influence of university-level ethical instruction on everyday behavior, Schwitzgebel et al. (2020) and Jalil et al. (2020) found that students purchase less meat after exposure to material on the ethics of eating meat. We sought to extend and conceptually replicate this research. Seven hundred thirty students in three large philosophy classes read James Rachels' (2004) \"Basic Argument for Vegetarianism\", followed by 50-min small-group discussions. Half also viewed a vegetarianism advocacy video containing factory farm footage. A few days after instruction, 54% of students agreed that \"eating the meat of factory farmed animals is unethical\", compared to 37% before instruction, with no difference between the film and non-film conditions. Also, 39% of students anonymously pledged to avoid eating factory farmed meat for 24 h, again with no statistically detectable difference between conditions. Finally, we obtained 2828 campus food purchase receipts for 113 of the enrolled students who used their Student ID cards for purchases on campus, which we compared with 5033 purchases from a group of 226 students who did not receive the instruction. Meat purchases remained constant in the comparison group and declined among the students exposed to the material, falling from 30% to 23% of purchases overall and from 51% to 42% of purchases of $4.99 or more, with the effect possibly larger in the film condition.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":"113-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9159653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

What's inside is all that counts? The contours of everyday thinking about self-control. 里面的东西才是最重要的?每天思考自我控制的轮廓。

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2

Juan Pablo Bermúdez, Samuel Murray, Louis Chartrand, Sergio Barbosa

{"title":"What's inside is all that counts? The contours of everyday thinking about self-control.","authors":"Juan Pablo Bermúdez, Samuel Murray, Louis Chartrand, Sergio Barbosa","doi":"10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2","url":null,"abstract":"Does self-control require willpower? The question cuts to the heart of a debate about whether self-control is identical with some psychological process internal to the agents or not. Noticeably absent from these debates is systematic evidence about the folk-psychological category of self-control. Here, we present the results of two behavioral studies (N = 296) that indicate the structure of everyday use of the concept. In Study 1, participants rated the degree to which different strategies to respond to motivational conflict exemplify self-control. Participants distinguished between intra-psychic and externally-scaffolded strategies and judged that the former exemplified self-control more than the latter. In Study 2, participants provided various solutions to manage motivational conflict and rated their proposals on effectiveness. Participants produced substantially more intra-psychic strategies, rated them as more effective, and advised them at a higher rate than externally-scaffolded strategies. Taken together, these results suggest that while people recognize a plurality of strategies as genuine instances of self-control, purely internal exercises of self-control are considered more prototypical than their externally-scaffolded counterparts. This implies a hierarchical structure for the folk psychological category of self-control. The concept encompasses a variety of regulatory strategies and organizes these strategies along a hierarchical continuum, with purely intra-psychic strategies at the center and scaffolded strategies in the periphery.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":"33-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033625/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9244417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8