International Studies Perspectives最新文献_第10页

Anxiety and the Onset of COVID-19: Examining Concerns of Historically Excluded Scholars 焦虑与COVID-19的发作:审视历史上被排斥的学者的担忧

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1093/isp/ekab017

Jennifer M. Ramos, Jamie Scalera Elliott, C. Fattore, Marijke Breuning

{"title":"Anxiety and the Onset of COVID-19: Examining Concerns of Historically Excluded Scholars","authors":"Jennifer M. Ramos, Jamie Scalera Elliott, C. Fattore, Marijke Breuning","doi":"10.1093/isp/ekab017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekab017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic increased uncertainty, leading to questions about how it spread, how long it would last, and its long-term effects. In academia, many scholars worried about their positions and career advancement. Our research focuses on how different groups within academia coped during the initial period of the pandemic, with particular attention paid to the role of anxiety. We argue that vulnerable groups, such as historically excluded individuals, graduate students, and women, felt even higher levels of anxiety. We use original survey data collected from international relations and political science scholars during May 2020. We content analyze open-ended responses to illustrate the impacts of the pandemic on our participants’ work life, including research productivity, the job market, promotion, and tenure. These analyses reveal not only what different groups of scholars are concerned about, but also the different ways in which they discuss the pandemic. Our research aims to highlight the social and mental health effects of the pandemic, with an eye toward addressing inequalities in academia.","PeriodicalId":47002,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48619169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Economic Multilateralism in Peril 经济多边主义岌岌可危

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211056741

M. Agarwal

引用次数: 0

Besnik Pula, Globalization Under and After Socialism: The Evolution of Transnational Capital in Central And Eastern Europe 社会主义下与社会主义后的全球化:中欧和东欧跨国资本的演变

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211045529

Pooja

引用次数: 0

Re-imagining the SCO’s Geopolitical Expansion: Would It Be a Next SAARC? 重新构想上合组织的地缘政治扩张:它会成为下一个南盟吗?

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211056750

Sandeep Singh, Bawa Singh

引用次数: 3

Middle Power Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific: India and Australia at the Forefront 印太地区的中等大国合作:印度和澳大利亚走在前列

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211056742

Shubhamitra Das

{"title":"Middle Power Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific: India and Australia at the Forefront","authors":"Shubhamitra Das","doi":"10.1177/00208817211056742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817211056742","url":null,"abstract":"Indo-Pacific has emerged as a region of great movement, conflict and cooperation, contestations and coalition-building. The emergence of minilateral and multilateral cooperation by the middle powers is increasing in the region, with the regional countries enthusiastically mapping the region focussing on their centrality. History proves that the role of middle-power countries became more prominent during the moments of international transition. The two contrasting powers like India and Australia; one with a post-colonial identity in foreign policy-making, subtle emphasis on non-aligned movement (NAM) and emerging as an influential power, and, on the other, a traditional middle power with an alliance structure and regionalism akin to the Western model, have equal stakes in the region and it is inevitable for them to take a leadership position in building what is called a middle power communion in the Indo-Pacific. This article will explore the understanding of middle powers and how India and Australia, as middle powers; are strategically placed and, being great powers within their respective regions; take the responsibility of region-building and maintaining peace with great powers, and how the Indo-Pacific and Quad are emerging as discourses within their foreign policy-making.","PeriodicalId":47002,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Perspectives","volume":"18 1","pages":"513 - 529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90811274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Dilip Gogoi, Making of India’s Northeast: Geopolitics of Borderland and Transnational Interactions 印度东北地区的形成:边境地区的地缘政治与跨国互动

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211045239

Rajan Kumar

引用次数: 0

Barriers to UN–Civil Society Collaborations: An Exploratory Study of CSOs Within the UN–ECOSOC Consultative Status Programme 联合国与民间社会合作的障碍:联合国经社理事会咨商地位方案下民间社会组织的探索性研究

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211056751

B. Mowell

{"title":"Barriers to UN–Civil Society Collaborations: An Exploratory Study of CSOs Within the UN–ECOSOC Consultative Status Programme","authors":"B. Mowell","doi":"10.1177/00208817211056751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817211056751","url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, civil society organizations (CSOs) have ostensibly attained increased access to the United Nations (UN) and other intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and, in turn, increased opportunities for collaboration with IGOs. However, in most cases, CSO access to IGOs remains limited and highly regimented. Little scholarship has been undertaken to examine barriers to effective CSO–IGO collaborations. Virtually, no empirical research has examined the degree or nature of the interaction between the UN and international civil society via the dynamic of the flagship programme designed to facilitate such collaborations—the consultative status framework. This exploratory study partially addresses the latter gap in the scholarship by undertaking a qualitative macro-scale examination of CSOs within the UN Economic and Social Council’s (ECOSOC) consultative status programme, the primary vehicle in the UN–civil society dynamic. Specifically, the study sought to identify barriers to UN–civil society collaboration within the consultative status programme as perceived by participating CSOs. Findings of a survey sent to a random sample of 10% of CSOs holding UN–ECOSOC consultative status revealed that barriers to participation in the programme varied with some obstacles far more common than others. The degree of barriers reported by CSOs also strongly reflected the level of accreditation they held within the programme. Additionally, survey respondents offered insight as to how impediments in the collaboration could potentially be addressed.","PeriodicalId":47002,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Perspectives","volume":"32 1","pages":"466 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90866634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

India’s Labour Agreements with the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Assessment 印度与海湾合作委员会国家的劳工协定:评估

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211055344

S. Hameed

引用次数: 0

Chan Young Bang, Transition Beyond Denuclearization: A Bold Challenge for Kim Jong Un 陈永邦:《超越无核化的过渡:对金正恩的大胆挑战

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211045534

P. Ganeshpandian

引用次数: 1

Ashok Sharma, India’s Pursuit of Energy Security: Domestic Measures, Foreign Policy and Geopolitics 《印度追求能源安全:国内措施、外交政策和地缘政治》

IF 2.4 1区社会学

International Studies Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/00208817211045237

Pramod Kumar

引用次数: 0