Presidential Studies Quarterly最新文献_第4页

Keeping tabs on the executive 密切关注高管

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12829

Jennifer L. Selin, G. Moore

引用次数: 0

Presidential partisanship and regulatory review 总统党派之争和监管审查

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12826

A. Benn

引用次数: 0

Creating the executive budget process: What was Congress thinking? 制定行政预算程序:国会在想什么?

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12828

J. Douglas, R. Kravchuk

引用次数: 0

Comparing the impact of Joe Biden and Donald Trump on popular attitudes toward their parties 比较乔·拜登和唐纳德·特朗普对民众对各自政党态度的影响

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12825

G. Jacobson

引用次数: 0

To preserve, release, and litigate: Dimensions of executive branch transparency 保留、释放和诉讼:行政部门透明度的维度

4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12824

Gbemende E. Johnson, Tracey E. George

{"title":"To preserve, release, and litigate: Dimensions of executive branch transparency","authors":"Gbemende E. Johnson, Tracey E. George","doi":"10.1111/psq.12824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12824","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Transparency is essential for public awareness of government activity and in holding officials accountable for their behavior and decisions. However, executives understandably have a desire to maintain autonomy over the flow of information outside of the executive branch, which can sometimes lead to a clash between government openness and executive control over information. This article investigates executive branch transparency along two specific dimensions: threats to the preservation of government information, and the judicial monitoring of executive branch transparency. Federal law directs executive branch actors to preserve government information. Statutes and regulations detail governing policies as well as guidelines that apply to every presidential administration. However, we consider each rule and recommendation through the lens of the Trump administration to gain greater clarity and precision. The Trump administration proves a useful focus for our empirical analysis because of its recency as well as multiple reports of its improper handling and preservation of records. We lay out and develop a typology of threats to record preservation. Preservation conflicts have emerged across multiple presidential administrations and have become increasingly common and visible. Judicial monitoring of executive branch transparency has become a crucial tool to address the withholding of records. We show that federal judges can play a vital role in defining the boundaries of government transparency through their decisions in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. The U.S. Department of Justice oversees and often leads the government's defense against FOIA actions. We find that federal judges are most likely to require executive branch responsiveness and disclosure when the judges' underlying policy preferences are most distant from that of the administration. Our findings should inform reforms to protect government transparency.","PeriodicalId":46768,"journal":{"name":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135721371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Managing our SOBs: Washington's response to friendly dictators in trouble 管理我们的SOBs：华盛顿对陷入困境的友好独裁者的回应

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12823

Victoria Beliveau

引用次数: 0

Fighting the last war: Is presidential hindsight 20‐20? 打最后一场战争:总统的后见之明是20 - 20吗?

IF 0.8 4区社会学

Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1111/psq.12821

Bryan N. Groves

引用次数: 0

Institutional constraints on the executive, investment, and elections 对行政、投资和选举的制度限制