Patterns of Prejudice最新文献_第7页

Economic development, attitudes towards migration and the (lack of) willingness to help refugees: insights from the Aurora Humanitarian Index 经济发展、对移民的态度和(缺乏)帮助难民的意愿:来自奥罗拉人道主义指数的见解

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1898816

D. Jacobs

引用次数: 0

Canonizing Du Bois 杜波依斯的典范

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2021.1981629

Aldon D Morris

引用次数: 0

Britain and the Holocaust, the Holocaust and Britain 英国和大屠杀，大屠杀和英国

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1985249

D. Adamson

{"title":"Britain and the Holocaust, the Holocaust and Britain","authors":"D. Adamson","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1985249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1985249","url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between Britain and the Holocaust is one underscored by complexity. British responses to the persecution of Jews and other groups —both at the time and retrospectively—have been laced with a certain ambiguity. The Palgrave Handbook of Britain and the Holocaust represents a valuable tool with which readers might navigate the competing strands of Holocaust history in the United Kingdom: action and inaction, remembrance and ‘amnesia’, established and problematic narratives. Central to the book is a prudent conviction in the belief that a firm framework of historical fact is crucial to furthering understanding of the topic in question. The Palgrave Handbook of Britain and the Holocaust provides a welcome revisit to existing surveys, by the likes of Jensen and Sharples, of Britain and the Holocaust. Given their existing contribution to the field, there are few individuals more suited to guide the discourse on such an intricate historical issue than Tom Lawson and Andy Pearce. Pearce and Lawson oversee a collection of over twenty chapters from a collection of esteemed authors. The contributors to the book, ranging from established academics to upcoming scholars alike, are as diverse as the different subtopics examined. Crucially, by expanding its historical scope well beyond the parameters of 1939 and 1945, the Palgrave Handbook of Britain and the Holocaust counteracts any tendencies to subsume the Holocaust into broader British narratives of the Second World War. The book is thoughtfully divided into nine parts, including ‘Political Contexts’ (Part I), ‘Punishment and Memory’ (Part IV) and ‘Public Pedagogy’ (Part VII). As such, while the overall narrative arc of the relationship between Britain and the Holocaust is maintained, the reader is able to distinguish some theoretical separations between the different themes explored. Pleasingly, the undoubted sophistication of the volume by no means impedes its accessibility to a general readership.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":"55 1","pages":"209 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43765965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hate in the Homeland: an interview with Cynthia Miller-Idriss 国土仇恨：辛西娅·米勒-伊德里斯访谈录

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2021.1987623

S. Burley

引用次数: 0

A window on the shameful history of internment in Britain 揭开了英国不光彩的拘留史

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2021.1985752

N. Jacobs

引用次数: 0

The colour of the transcendental deduction 先验演绎的色彩

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1920721

Richard W. Leblanc

{"title":"The colour of the transcendental deduction","authors":"Richard W. Leblanc","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1920721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1920721","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT LeBlanc’s article interprets Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories in the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787) in light of his texts on race. It shows that, when Kant’s less canonical work on race is considered, his racial neutrality in this so-called ‘first critique’ becomes flawed. The first part of LeBlanc’s argumentation suggests that Kant’s monogenetic conception of the human species is compatible with the universalism of the transcendental deduction, and explains how this is largely supported by the fact that Kant himself diminished the importance of his work on race. It is in this broader context that LeBlanc concludes this first section by asserting that the categories of the human understanding, as explained in the transcendental deduction, would be applicable to the whole human species if we followed Kant’s logic. The second part of this paper starts from the Kantian idea that only white European peoples can produce science. It demonstrates that this Kantian idea broadens the function of the transcendental deduction in the first critique with regard to the history of modern science—namely, to give legitimacy to Newton’s science—to exclude non-Whites from the work of science in general. It is thus the juxtaposition of Kant’s analysis of modern European scientific culture on the one hand, and his account of human races on the other, that indicates a possible implicit racism in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The colour of the transcendental deduction in its function of scientific legitimation is thus revealed to be potentially white, although LeBlanc’s article still admits that other interpretive perspectives are reasonable and possible. His conclusion aims to make suggestions about the future of Kant studies in a global context in which postcoloniality can no longer be avoided, and the work of scholars such as Robert Bernasconi and Charles W. Mills, among others, should be taken as crucial.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":"55 1","pages":"147 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46756601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The multiculturalist challenge: a rejoinder 多元文化主义的挑战:一个反驳

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2020.1866880

T. Modood

引用次数: 2

Cracking and moderating secularist assumptions. 打破和缓和世俗主义的假设。

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-02-17 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2020.1866876

Pooyan Tamimi Arab

引用次数: 0

Rethinking political secularism: the multiculturalist challenge 重新思考政治世俗主义:多元文化主义的挑战

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2020.1866873

T. Modood

引用次数: 2

Gender and family rhetoric on the German far right 德国极右翼的性别和家庭言论

IF 1.5 2区社会学

Patterns of Prejudice Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1898815

Katrine Fangen, Lisanne Lichtenberg

{"title":"Gender and family rhetoric on the German far right","authors":"Katrine Fangen, Lisanne Lichtenberg","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1898815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1898815","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historically, the family and, more generally, gender policies have been a central issue in both nationalist and far-right rhetoric. This holds particularly for Germany, where the so-called male-breadwinner model and the rhetoric of Kinder, Küche, Kirche (children, kitchen, church) have a long tradition. At the same time, Germany’s National Socialist past confers a negative connotation on notions of the family as a continuation of the nation. In this article, Fangen and Lichtenberg examine the family policies and views on gender roles, as well as the views on Muslims, of politicians from two German far-right parties and their youth organizations, as well as one German anti-immigrant social movement organization. Their study, based on press releases, party programmes and social media posts, adds to the growing literature on the importance of gender in nationalist and far-right politics in general, and in far-right critiques of Islam in particular. Their specific contribution is a detailed focus on the similarities and differences in various organizations on the German far right, as well as an analysis that draws on concepts such as femonationalism and, in a similar vein, Rogers Brubaker’s notion of civilizationism.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":"55 1","pages":"71 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1898815","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41586658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7