PHILOSOPHIA最新文献_第8页

Self-Narrative, Literary Narrative, and Self-Understanding 自我叙事、文学叙事与自我理解

4区哲学

PHILOSOPHIA Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-023-00687-0

Marya Schechtman

引用次数: 0

Confusing Narratives 混乱的故事

4区哲学

PHILOSOPHIA Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-023-00685-2

Robert Piercey

引用次数: 0

Integrated Information is not Causation: Why Integrated Information Theory’s Causal Structures do not Beat Causal Reductionism 综合信息不是因果关系:为什么综合信息理论的因果结构不能击败因果还原论

4区哲学

PHILOSOPHIA Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-023-00684-3

Javier Sánchez-Cañizares

{"title":"Integrated Information is not Causation: Why Integrated Information Theory’s Causal Structures do not Beat Causal Reductionism","authors":"Javier Sánchez-Cañizares","doi":"10.1007/s11406-023-00684-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-023-00684-3","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a recent work (Grasso et al., 2021), practitioners of the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) claim to have overcome the weaknesses of causal reductionism in producing a coherent account of causation, as causal reductionism would blatantly conflate causation with prediction and could not answer the question of ‘what caused what.’ In this paper, I reject such a dismissal of causal reductionism since IIT anti-reductionists misunderstand the reductionist stance. The reductionists can still invoke a causal account stemming from the causal power of the universe’s basic units and interactions that, eventually, may lead to structures supporting integrated information. Additionally, I claim that the IIT-inspired misunderstanding of causal reductionism originates from the former’s metaphysical deficit, conflating information with causation. However, as a possible way out, if IIT is complemented with a deeper metaphysical ground, such as nested hylomorphism, an improved argument against causal reductionism can be made to work by invoking formal causality as the ultimate cause of integration in natural systems.","PeriodicalId":46695,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHIA","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135308496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Humility’s Independence 谦逊的独立

4区哲学

PHILOSOPHIA Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-023-00682-5

Derick Hughes

引用次数: 0

The Grounds of Excuses 借口的理由

IF 0.5 4区哲学

PHILOSOPHIA Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11406-023-00681-6

Marie van Loon

引用次数: 0

“In Defence of Jus Ad Bellum Criteria” “为Just-Ad-Bellum标准辩护”