Environmental Justice最新文献_第9页

Healthier Nail Salons: From Feminized to Collective Responsibilities of Care 更健康的美甲沙龙:从女性化到集体护理责任

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0097

Reena Shadaan

引用次数: 0

Sites of Ambivalence? Conflicting Attitudes Toward Coal in Southern West Virginia 矛盾的网站?西弗吉尼亚州南部对煤炭的矛盾态度

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0094

Pierce Greenberg

引用次数: 0

Birdwatching on Brownfields: Contradictory Contexts and Ambivalence in the Neoliberal City 棕地观鸟:新自由主义城市的矛盾语境和矛盾心理

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0109

Amanda McMillan Lequieu

引用次数: 2

The Subtle Production of Quiescence: Tracing the Neoliberalization of Environmental Justice Policy Implementation 宁静的微妙生产:追踪环境正义政策实施的新自由主义化

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0090

J. Harrison, Maya Gabriela-Auiler Contreras

引用次数: 1

The Intersection of Incarceration and Injustice: Environmental Burdens in Prison Communities 监禁与不公正的交集:监狱社区的环境负担

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0083

J. Saxe

引用次数: 2

Plain Language as a Prerequisite for Environmental Justice 语言平实是环境正义的先决条件

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0108

Natalie Sampson, Melanie Sampson, Carmel E. Price, Sara Almuktar, Andrew Bashi, Samra’a Luqman

引用次数: 2

The Evolution of Climate Action in the Environmental Justice Movement, 2010–2020 环境正义运动中气候行动的演变，2010-2020

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0062

C. Martín

引用次数: 1

Rural Consciousness and Framing Environmental (In)Justice 农村意识与环境正义的建构

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0080

Nicholas Theis, A. Driscoll

引用次数: 0

Callous Cruelty and Blow Back: Immigration and Customs Enforcement Facilities, Riskscapes, and Community Transmission of COVID-19 无情的残酷和反击:移民和海关执法设施、风险状况和COVID-19的社区传播

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0040

G. Hooks, Michael Lengefeld

{"title":"Callous Cruelty and Blow Back: Immigration and Customs Enforcement Facilities, Riskscapes, and Community Transmission of COVID-19","authors":"G. Hooks, Michael Lengefeld","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0040","url":null,"abstract":"This research builds on and extends critical environmental justice research into carceral spaces. Here, the focus is on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on the lessons provided by the Black Lives Matter social movement and critical race theory, this research draws connections between the institutionalized racism in the criminal justice system and immigration policies. The nativist and racist rationale for harsh immigration policies asserts that callous treatment of immigrants makes U.S. society safer. However, the blow back from these policies makes U.S. society less secure and degrades the civil and political rights for all. Informed by a riskscape framework, we pursue multiscalar and empirical research into this blow back. Riskscapes encompass different viewpoints on the threat of loss across space, time, individuals, and collectives. More tangibly, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, ICE detention facilities provided ideal conditions for the infection to spread among the people detained, visitors, and staff. The walls and fences surrounding ICE facilities did not prevent the spread of infection to nearby communities, counties, and regions. Heightened infection rates provide tangible (and tragic) evidence of the blow back from the callousness of U.S. immigration policies in general and of ICE facilities in specific. This synthesis of critical environmental justice and riskscapes literatures lays the foundation for a textured and multi-layered understanding of the unequal and institutional dimensions of risks in and around carceral facilities.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89097317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Landscape Assessment of the US Environmental Justice Movement: Transformative Strategies for Climate Justice 美国环境正义运动的景观评估:气候正义的变革战略

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0075

A. Baptista, Sujatha Jesudason, M. Greenberg, Adrienne Perovich

{"title":"Landscape Assessment of the US Environmental Justice Movement: Transformative Strategies for Climate Justice","authors":"A. Baptista, Sujatha Jesudason, M. Greenberg, Adrienne Perovich","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0075","url":null,"abstract":"The environmental justice movement (EJM) in the United States has grown in size and in its cultural and political importance in climate and environmental policy circles. This growth has meant that the organizations and leaders that make up the EJM and their respective areas of focus are also evolving. The social movement capacities of the EJM are important predictors of the future success of the movement as the climate crisis bears down on vulnerable communities worldwide. As a part of designing a leadership program for environmental justice (EJ) activists based at The New School, this landscape assessment surveyed and interviewed more than 200 EJ movement activists across the country to explore the priorities, strategies, challenges, and social movement capacities of the EJM. The study reveals that EJM activists work across a diverse set of issues and rank climate justice among their highest priority issues. They overwhelmingly rely on base building, coalitions, and organizing strategies to do their work. In reﬂecting on the movement’s contemporary approaches, activists articulated the importance of shared frameworks such as climate justice to shift popular narratives and action on climate change. The climate justice frame reﬂects a critical, intersectional, and reconstructive conceptualization of the climate crisis that requires disrupting the status quo approaches to climate change. The study points to some of the challenges and opportunities ahead for realizing such a contentious and transformative climate justice vision led by EJM activists in a moment of expanding political opportunity and risk.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87941756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5