Environmental Justice最新文献_第4页

The Intersectionality of Environmental Injustice, Other Societal Harms, and Farmed Animal Welfare 环境不公正、其他社会危害和养殖动物福利的交叉性

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0125

Laura Fox

引用次数: 0

Robert Gottlieb. Care-Centered Politics: From the Home to the Planet. (Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2022) 罗伯特·戈特利布。以关怀为中心的政治:从家庭到地球。(剑桥，麻省理工学院出版社，2022年)

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0102

David N. Pellow

引用次数: 0

Assessing Metal Exposures Among Children Living in Environmental Justice Communities Near Metal Recycling Facilities in Houston, Texas 评估居住在德克萨斯州休斯顿金属回收设施附近的环境正义社区儿童的金属暴露

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0023

E. Symanski, K. Whitworth, Inkyu Han, Amal Rammah, J. Álvarez, Iman Moussa, Heyreoun An Han, J. Flores

引用次数: 0

Facilitating Equitable Distribution of Justice40 Initiative Funding for Lead in Drinking Water 促进公平分配正义40倡议为饮用水中的铅提供资金

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0040

Danielle Hoague, M. Jones, Rae Spriggs, Megan Wong, Frederick Johnson, Elijah Catalan, Michael Shin, Timothy Watkins, Keith Norris

引用次数: 0

Environmental Injustice as a Multiplier of Injustice and Human Insecurity: The Cases of Boko Haram and the Taliban 环境不公正是不公正和人类不安全的乘数:博科圣地和塔利班的案例

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0060

Rainer Maria Baratti

引用次数: 0

A Collaborative Approach to Addressing Environmental Injustice in Fifth Ward, Houston, Texas 解决德克萨斯州休斯顿第五区环境不公正问题的合作方法

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0036

James Caldwell, Tykeara Mims, Jacquita N Johnson, B. Dixon

引用次数: 0

Environmental Justice: Lessons from the Water Crisis in Brasília, Brazil 环境正义:巴西Brasília水危机的教训

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0057

M. G. M. Capelari, Marilia Teresinha De Sousa Machado, Benilson Borinelli, Bernardo Carlos Spaulonci Chiachia Matos de Oliveira

引用次数: 0

Understanding Principles of Environmental Racism, Climate Change, and the Blob: A Socioecological Approach in the Development of Food Justice 理解环境种族主义、气候变化和斑点的原则:食品正义发展中的社会生态学方法

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/env.2021.0114

August John Hoffman

{"title":"Understanding Principles of Environmental Racism, Climate Change, and the Blob: A Socioecological Approach in the Development of Food Justice","authors":"August John Hoffman","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0114","url":null,"abstract":"This mixed-methods quasiexperimental study examined the role of community psychology in relation to increasing problems of climate change, environmental racism, sustainable food production programs, and ecojustice. Green space and environmentally sustainable programs are increasingly popular examples of community service activities that can provide multiple ecologically sustainable benefits, including protecting limited natural resources and reducing carbon emissions and also facilitate community empowerment among vulnerable and Persons of Color and Indigenous groups. A significant (r = 0.869, p < 0.01) correlation was determined between engagement in green community service work (CSW) activities (i.e., a community fruit tree planting project among the Indigenous people of the Lower Sioux Tribal Nation), perceptions of community empowerment, and likelihood of participating in future CSW activities. Results of the study may be particularly appropriate for community organizers, educators, and stakeholders who are engaged and committed in the development of environmentally sustainable programs. In addition, the results of this study are both useful and viable in that they provide mechanisms to improve community health and empowerment in the development of sustainable community gardens and fruit tree orchards. Suggestions for future areas of study (including the development of community vegetable gardens, native prairie plants, and fruit tree orchards) are offered.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136186808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

What Does Chelsea Creek Do for You? A Relational Approach to Environmental Justice Communication 切尔西溪为你做了什么?环境正义传播的关系研究

IF 2

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0081

L. Horgan, Kira Mok, Eliza Boetsch, Sophie Kelly, Katherine Dickinson, Eric Nost, Roseann Bongiavanni, S. Wylie

引用次数: 0

Chlorpyrifos: Who Paid and Who Profited? 毒死蜱:谁付钱，谁获利?

Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI: 10.1089/env.2022.0074

Evan S. Baker, Kyle J. Moon, Rachel C. Branco

{"title":"Chlorpyrifos: Who Paid and Who Profited?","authors":"Evan S. Baker, Kyle J. Moon, Rachel C. Branco","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0074","url":null,"abstract":"Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate pesticide that has been widely used in agricultural and residential contexts since its introduction in 1965. Policies surrounding chlorpyrifos use changed dramatically over the past two decades. In 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limited applications to nonfood uses. The EPA's recent policy implementation was catalyzed by research findings published over a decade ago, citing the impacts of chlorpyrifos exposure on the developing nervous system. In this historical essay, we briefly outline the uses and hazards of chlorpyrifos and the factors influencing regulatory guidelines and policy implementation. Using an environmental justice framework, we present the story of chlorpyrifos as a case study of broader trends in the history of environmental hazards and pollution regulation, where regulatory interference allows companies to profit while those outside of the market pay the price. In the case of chlorpyrifos, corporate-funded research on the safety of the pesticide formed the basis for its continued usage. Meanwhile, people who are poor, belong to a racial and ethnic minority, and/or who work in agriculture face disproportionate rates of exposure, giving rise to disparate neurodevelopmental outcomes. In this way, the story of chlorpyrifos regulation is an example of how health inequities can remain entrenched in disenfranchised communities across the United States.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136152072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0