Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions最新文献

{"title":"Empathy and tolerance of ambiguity in medical students and doctors participating in art-based observational training at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: a before-and-after study","authors":"Stella Anna Bult, Thomas van Gulik","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.3","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research presents an experimental study using validated questionnaires to quantitatively assess the outcomes of art-based observational training in medical students, residents, and specialists. The study tested the hypothesis that art-based observational training would lead to measurable effects on judgement skills (tolerance of ambiguity) and empathy in medical students and doctors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental cohort study with pre- and post-intervention assessments was conducted using validated questionnaires and qualitative evaluation forms to examine the outcomes of art-based observational training in medical students and doctors. Between December 2023 and June 2024, 15 art courses were conducted in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. Participants were assessed on empathy using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and tolerance of ambiguity using the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students and Doctors (TAMSAD) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 91 participants were included; 29 participants completed the JSE and 62 completed the TAMSAD scales. The results showed statistically significant post-test increases for mean JSE and TAMSAD scores (3.71 points for the JSE, ranging from 20 to 140, and 1.86 points for the TAMSAD, ranging from 0 to 100). The qualitative findings were predominantly positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that incorporating art-based observational training in medical education improves empathy and tolerance of ambiguity. This study highlights the importance of art-based observational training in medical education in the professional development of medical students and doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880821/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Longitudinal relationships between Korean medical students' academic performance in medical knowledge and clinical performance examinations: a retrospective longitudinal study.","authors":"Yulim Kang, Hae Won Kim","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.18","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the longitudinal relationships between performance on 3 examinations assessing medical knowledge and clinical skills among Korean medical students in the clinical phase. This study addressed the stability of each examination score and the interrelationships among examinations over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted at Yonsei University College of Medicine in Korea with a cohort of 112 medical students over 2 years. The students were in their third year in 2022 and progressed to the fourth year in 2023. We obtained comprehensive clinical science examination (CCSE) and progress test (PT) scores 3 times (T1-T3), and clinical performance examination (CPX) scores twice (T1 and T2). Autoregressive cross-lagged models were fitted to analyze their relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of the 3 examinations, the score at 1 time point predicted the subsequent score. Regarding cross-lagged effects, the CCSE at T1 predicted PT at T2 (β=0.472, P<0.001) and CCSE at T2 predicted PT at T3 (β=0.527, P<0.001). The CPX at T1 predicted the CCSE at T2 (β=0.163, P=0.006), and the CPX at T2 predicted the CCSE at T3 (β=0.154, P=0.006). The PT at T1 predicted the CPX at T2 (β=0.273, P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified each examination's stability and the complexity of the longitudinal relationships between them. These findings may help predict medical students' performance on subsequent examinations, potentially informing the provision of necessary student support.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144267588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mixed reality versus manikins in basic life support simulation-based training for medical students in France: the mixed reality non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sofia Barlocco De La Vega, Evelyne Guerif-Dubreucq, Jebrane Bouaoud, Myriam Awad, Léonard Mathon, Agathe Beauvais, Thomas Olivier, Pierre-Clément Thiébaud, Anne-Laure Philippon","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.15","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.15","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of mixed reality with traditional manikin-based simulation in basic life support (BLS) training, testing the hypothesis that mixed reality is non-inferior to manikin-based simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted. Third-year medical students were randomized into 2 groups. The mixed reality group received 32 minutes of individual training using a virtual reality headset and a torso for chest compressions (CC). The manikin group participated in 2 hours of group training consisting of theoretical and practical sessions using a low-fidelity manikin. The primary outcome was the overall BLS performance score, assessed at 1 month through a standardized BLS scenario using a 10-item assessment scale. The quality of CC, student satisfaction, and confidence levels were secondary outcomes and assessed through superiority analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 155 participants were analyzed, with 84 in the mixed reality group and 71 in the manikin group. The mean overall BLS performance score was 6.4 (mixed reality) vs. 6.5 (manikin), (mean difference, -0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.45 to +∞). CC depth was greater in the manikin group (50.3 mm vs. 46.6 mm; mean difference, -3.7 mm; 95% CI, -6.5 to -0.9), with 61.2% achieving optimal depth compared to 43.8% in the mixed reality group (mean difference, 17.4%; 95% CI, -29.3 to -5.5). Satisfaction was higher in the mixed reality group (4.9/5 vs. 4.7/5 in the manikin group; difference, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.33), as was confidence in performing BLS (3.9/5 vs. 3.6/5; difference, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.58). No other significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mixed reality is non-inferior to manikin simulation in terms of overall BLS performance score assessed at 1 month.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144040345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pharmacy students’ perspective on remote flipped classrooms in Malaysia: a qualitative study.","authors":"Wei Jin Wong, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Ronald Fook Seng Lee","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.2","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore pharmacy students’ perceptions of remote flipped classrooms in Malaysia, focusing on their learning experiences and identifying areas for potential improvement to inform future educational strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing inductive thematic analysis. Twenty Bachelor of Pharmacy students (18 women, 2 men; age range, 19–24 years) from Monash University participated in 8 focus group discussions over 2 rounds during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling. The focus group discussions, led by experienced academics, were conducted in English via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed for analysis using NVivo. Themes were identified through emergent coding and iterative discussions to ensure thematic saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: flexibility, communication, technological challenges, skill-based learning challenges, and time-based effects. Students appreciated the flexibility of accessing and reviewing pre-class materials at their convenience. Increased engagement through anonymous question submission was noted, yet communication difficulties and lack of non-verbal cues in remote workshops were significant drawbacks. Technological issues, such as internet connectivity problems, hindered learning, especially during assessments. Skill-based learning faced challenges in remote settings, including lab activities and clinical examinations. Additionally, prolonged remote learning led to feelings of isolation, fatigue, and a desire to return to in-person interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote flipped classrooms offer flexibility and engagement benefits but present notable challenges related to communication, technology, and skill-based learning. To improve remote education, institutions should integrate robust technological support, enhance communication strategies, and incorporate virtual simulations for practical skills. Balancing asynchronous and synchronous methods while addressing academic success and socioemotional wellness is essential for effective remote learning environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing genetic and genomic literacy concepts among Albanian nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Elona Gaxhja, Mitilda Gugu, Angelo Dante, Armelda Teta, Armela Kapaj, Liljana Ramasaco","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to adapt and validate the Albanian version of the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI) and to assess the level of genomic literacy among nursing and midwifery students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via a monocentric online cross-sectional study using the Albanian version of the GNCI. Participants included first-, second-, and third-year nursing and midwifery students. Demographic data such as age, sex, year level, and prior exposure to genetics were collected. The Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests were used to compare demographic characteristics and GNCI scores between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 715 participants, most were female (88.5%) with a median age of 19 years. Most respondents (65%) had not taken a genetics course, and 83.5% had not attended any related training. The mean score was 7.49, corresponding to a scale difficulty of 24.38% correct responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings reveal a low foundational knowledge of genetics/genomics among future nurses and midwives. It is essential to enhance learning strategies and update curricula to prepare a competent healthcare workforce in precision health.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144250211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reliability and construct validation of the Blended Learning Usability Evaluation-Questionnaire with interprofessional clinicians in Canada: a methodological study.","authors":"Anish Kumar Arora, Jeff Myers, Tavis Apramian, Kulamakan Kulasegaram, Daryl Bainbridge, Hsien Seow","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.5","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To generate Cronbach's alpha and further mixed methods construct validity evidence for the Blended Learning Usability Evaluation-Questionnaire (BLUE-Q).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty interprofessional clinicians completed the BLUE-Q after finishing a 3-month long blended learning professional development program in Ontario, Canada. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α for each of the 3 sections of the BLUE-Q and for all quantitative items together. Construct validity was evaluated through the Grand-Guillaume-Perrenoud et al. framework, which consists of 3 elements: congruence, convergence, and credibility. To compare quantitative and qualitative results, descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations for each Likert scale item of the BLUE-Q were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's α was 0.95 for the pedagogical usability section, 0.85 for the synchronous modality section, 0.93 for the asynchronous modality section, and 0.96 for all quantitative items together. Mean ratings (with standard deviations) were 4.77 (0.506) for pedagogy, 4.64 (0.654) for synchronous learning, and 4.75 (0.536) for asynchronous learning. Of the 239 qualitative comments received, 178 were identified as substantive, of which 88% were considered congruent and 79% were considered convergent with the high means. Among all congruent responses, 69% were considered confirming statements and 31% were considered clarifying statements, suggesting appropriate credibility. Analysis of the clarifying statements assisted in identifying 5 categories of suggestions for program improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BLUE-Q demonstrates high reliability and appropriate construct validity in the context of a blended learning program with interprofessional clinicians, making it a valuable tool for comprehensive program evaluation, quality improvement, and evaluative research in health professions education.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143711423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of strengthening nurse practitioners' competency in occupational health services for agricultural workers exposed to pesticides in primary care units, Thailand: a before-and-after study.","authors":"Napamon Pumsopa, Ann Jirapongsuwan, Surintorn Kalampakorn, Sukhontha Siri","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.14","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.14","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Strengthening Nurse Practitioners' Competency in Occupational Health Service (SNPCOHS) program. It was hypothesized that nurse practitioners (NPs) participating in the program would demonstrate increased competency in providing occupational health services to agricultural workers exposed to pesticides in primary care units (PCUs) compared to their baseline competency and to a comparison group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted between August and December 2023. The 4-week intervention included 5 hours of an e-learning program, 3 hours of online discussion, and 2 hours dedicated to completing an assignment. The program was evaluated at 3 time points: pre-intervention, post-intervention (week 4), and follow-up (week 8). Sixty NPs volunteered to participate, with 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the comparison group. Data on demographics, professional attributes, knowledge, skills, and perceived self-efficacy were collected using self-administered questionnaires via Google Forms. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and repeated measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in professional attributes, knowledge, skills, and perceived self-efficacy in providing occupational health services to agricultural workers exposed to pesticides compared to the comparison group at both week 4 and week 8 post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SNPCOHS program is well-suited for self-directed learning for nurses in PCUs, supporting effective occupational health service delivery. It should be disseminated and supported as an e-learning resource for NPs in PCUs (Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20250115004).</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144217236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of a virtual objective structured clinical examination in the metaverse (Second Life) to assess the clinical skills in emergency radiology of medical students in Spain: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alba Virtudes Perez-Baena, Teodoro Rudolphi-Solero, Rocio Lorenzo-Alvarez, Dolores Dominguez-Pinos, Miguel Jose Ruiz-Gomez, Francisco Sendra-Portero","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.12","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is an effective but resource-intensive tool for assessing clinical competence. This study hypothesized that implementing a virtual OSCE in the Second Life (SL) platform in the metaverse as a cost-effective alternative will effectively assess and enhance clinical skills in emergency radiology while being feasible and well-received. The aim was to evaluate a virtual radiology OSCE in SL as a formative assessment, focusing on feasibility, educational impact, and students' perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two virtual 6-station OSCE rooms dedicated to emergency radiology were developed in SL. Sixth-year medical students completed the OSCE during a 1-hour session in 2022-2023, followed by feedback including a correction checklist, individual scores, and group comparisons. Students completed a questionnaire with Likert-scale questions, a 10-point rating, and open-ended comments. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Student t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test, and qualitative data through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 163 students participated, achieving mean scores of 5.1±1.4 and 4.9±1.3 (out of 10) in the 2 virtual OSCE rooms, respectively (P=0.287). One hundred seventeen students evaluated the OSCE, praising the teaching staff (9.3±1.0), project organization (8.8±1.2), OSCE environment (8.7±1.5), training usefulness (8.6±1.5), and formative self-assessment (8.5±1.4). Likert-scale questions and students' open-ended comments highlighted the virtual environment's attractiveness, case selection, self-evaluation usefulness, project excellence, and training impact. Technical difficulties were reported by 13 students (8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating formative OSCEs in SL as a useful teaching tool for undergraduate radiology education, which was cost-effective and highly valued by students.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144250212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The irtQ R package: a user-friendly tool for item response theory-based test data analysis and calibration.","authors":"Hwanggyu Lim,Kyung Seok Kang","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.23","url":null,"abstract":"Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has become a widely adopted test design for high-stakes licensing and certification exams, particularly in the health professions in the United States, due to its ability to tailor test difficulty in real time, reducing testing time while providing precise ability estimates. A key component of CAT is item response theory (IRT), which facilitates the dynamic selection of items based on examinees' ability levels during a test. Accurate estimation of item and ability parameters is essential for successful CAT implementation, necessitating convenient and reliable software to ensure precise parameter estimation. This paper introduces the irtQ R package, which simplifies IRT-based analysis and item calibration under unidimensional IRT models. While it does not directly simulate CAT, it provides essential tools to support CAT development, including parameter estimation using marginal maximum likelihood estimation via the expectation-maximization algorithm, pretest item calibration through fixed item parameter calibration and fixed ability parameter calibration methods, and examinee ability estimation. The package also enables users to compute item and test characteristic curves and information functions necessary for evaluating the psychometric properties of a test. This paper illustrates the key features of the irtQ package through examples using simulated datasets, demonstrating its utility in IRT applications such as test data analysis and ability scoring. By providing a user-friendly environment for IRT analysis, irtQ significantly enhances the capacity for efficient adaptive testing research and operations. Finally, the paper highlights additional core functionalities of irtQ, emphasizing its broader applicability to the development and operation of IRT-based assessments.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"154 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pin-Hsiang Huang,Arash Arianpoor,Silas Taylor,Jenzel Gonzales,Boaz Shulruf","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.22","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEEvaluating medical school selection tools is vital for evidence-based student selection. With previous reviews revealing knowledge gaps, this meta-analysis offers insights into the effectiveness of these selection tools.METHODSA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted applying the following criteria: peer-reviewed articles available in English, published from 2010 and which include empirical data linking performance in selection tools with assessment and dropout outcomes of undergraduate entry medical programs. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, general opinion pieces, or commentaries were excluded. Effect sizes (ESs) of the predictability of academic and clinical performance within and by the end of the medicine program were extracted, and the pooled ESs were presented.RESULTSSixty-seven out of 2,212 articles were included, which yielded 236 ESs. Previous academic achievement predicted medical program academic performance (Cohen's d=0.697 in early program; 0.619 in end of program) and clinical exams (0.545 in end of program). Within aptitude tests, verbal reasoning and quantitative reasoning predicted academic achievement in the early program and in the last years (0.704 & 0.643, respectively). Overall aptitude tests predicted academic achievement in both the early and last years (0.550 & 0.371, respectively). Neither panel interviews, multiple mini-interviews, nor situational judgement tests (SJT) yielded statistically significant pooled ES.CONCLUSIONCurrent evidence suggests that learning outcomes are predicted by previous academic achievement and aptitude tests. The predictive value of SJT and topics such as selection algorithms, features of interview (e.g., content of the questions) and the way the interviewers' reports are used, warrant further research.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"44 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}