发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Supreme Court Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Mahanoy v. B.L. & First Amendment “Leeway” Mahanoy诉B.L.和第一修正案“Leeway”
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/720294
Mary-Rose Papandrea
{"title":"Mahanoy v. B.L. & First Amendment “Leeway”","authors":"Mary-Rose Papandrea","doi":"10.1086/720294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720294","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"53 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44746389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Late-Stage Textualism 晚期校勘学
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/719651
R. Doerfler
{"title":"Late-Stage Textualism","authors":"R. Doerfler","doi":"10.1086/719651","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719651","url":null,"abstract":"Are “canons of construction” embarrassing? For a long time, the answer was “yes.” Exposed as “contradictory” by Karl Llewellyn, a generation of legal thinkers understood interpretive canons to be so malleable in their application as to operate mostly as pretext. Rather than bring predictability to statutory decisions, the availability of more than one interpretive canon in nearly any appellate case meant that a canon’s invocation worked mostly to obscure the choice (conscious or not) by judges between legally permissible outcomes. Interpretive canons were thus tools of legalmystification, providing the appearance of law towhat were, ultimately, acts of discretion.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"267 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42182897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Eradicating Bush-League Arguments Root and Branch: The Article II Independent-State-Legislature Notion and Related Rubbish 彻底根除丛林之争:第二条独立州立法观念与相关垃圾
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/720128
V. Amar, A. Amar
{"title":"Eradicating Bush-League Arguments Root and Branch: The Article II Independent-State-Legislature Notion and Related Rubbish","authors":"V. Amar, A. Amar","doi":"10.1086/720128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720128","url":null,"abstract":"The biggest news of October Term 2020 was what didn’t happen: In the run-up to, and aftermath of, yet another tight and hard-fought presidential election, the Supreme Court declined to double down on some of the worst aspects of the execrable Bush v. Gore opinions of twenty years ago. But a close look at the Term reveals that there was a brief moment of genuine constitutional peril, a week when it seemed quite possible that the Court might once again—as it did in 2000—besmirch itself and plunge the country into a jurisprudential abyss. In the days preceding the election of 2020, a veritable carnival of litigants—let’s call them Bush-Leaguers—teed up several cases based on a seemingly plausible but ultimately preposterous constitutional","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48371978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Institutionalist Turn In Copyright 制度主义者交出版权
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/719042
Shyamkrishna Balganesh
{"title":"The Institutionalist Turn In Copyright","authors":"Shyamkrishna Balganesh","doi":"10.1086/719042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719042","url":null,"abstract":"It was a few minutes after 10 a.m. on October 9, 2002, a brisk Wednesday morning inWashington, D.C. Some of the crowd that had begun lining up outside the Court before daybreak to hear oral argument had successfully obtained seats in the visitor’s gallery, where they now waited with great anticipation for the Court to call its first case. In short order, Chief Justice Rehnquist announced that the Court was ready to hear arguments in the case of Eldred v. Ashcroft, and Professor Lawrence Lessig began presenting the case for the petitioner, arguing that the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) was an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s lawmaking power.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"417 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45195218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Showdown at Cedar Point: “Sole and Despotic Dominion” Gains Ground 在雪松点摊牌:“唯一和专制的统治”取得进展
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/720149
C. Estlund
{"title":"Showdown at Cedar Point: “Sole and Despotic Dominion” Gains Ground","authors":"C. Estlund","doi":"10.1086/720149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720149","url":null,"abstract":"Blackstone famously declared: “There is nothing which so generally strikes the imagination, and engages the affections of mankind, as the right of property; or that sole and despotic dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in total exclusion of the right of any other individual in the universe.” That seems to be so, if not for all “mankind,” then at least for the current majority of the Supreme Court. In the modern era, the deregulatory impact of property rights and takings law has been blunted by the dominant role of ad hoc balancing. Advocates, scholars, and judges seeking to sharpen the takings challenge to regulation have thus focused their efforts on creating and expanding “per se rules” that circumvent the default regime of balancing. So perhaps it should be no surprise that the first major takings case decided by the lopsidedly conservative Supreme Court that took the bench in 2020 produced a resounding victory for private property","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"125 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46630619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rigour Required: Recent Direction from the Supreme Court of Canada on Binding and Non-Binding Sources of International Law in Charter Interpretation 严格要求:加拿大最高法院关于宪章解释中具有约束力和不具有约束力的国际法渊源的最新指示
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/2563-8505.1429
R. Amarnath, C. Harris
{"title":"Rigour Required: Recent Direction from the Supreme Court of Canada on Binding and Non-Binding Sources of International Law in Charter Interpretation","authors":"R. Amarnath, C. Harris","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1429","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90942195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Plumber with Words: Seeking Constitutional Responsibility and an End to the Little Sisters Problem 一个管道工的话语:寻求宪法责任和结束小姐妹问题
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/2563-8505.1430
A. Latimer, Benjamin L. Berger
{"title":"A Plumber with Words: Seeking Constitutional Responsibility and an End to the Little Sisters Problem","authors":"A. Latimer, Benjamin L. Berger","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1430","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77262841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety, Health, and Union Access in Cedar Point Nursery Cedar Point托儿所的安全、健康和工会准入
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/720408
B. Sachs
{"title":"Safety, Health, and Union Access in Cedar Point Nursery","authors":"B. Sachs","doi":"10.1086/720408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720408","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"99 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49514273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Touch of Evil: Disagreements at the Heart of the Criminal Law Power 罪恶之触:刑法权力核心的分歧
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/2563-8505.1426
E. Adams
{"title":"Touch of Evil: Disagreements at the Heart of the Criminal Law Power","authors":"E. Adams","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1426","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75638325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Christianity Loses When Conservative Christians Win at The Supreme Court 当保守派基督徒在最高法院获胜时，基督教失去了什么
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/719566
Russell K. Robinson
{"title":"What Christianity Loses When Conservative Christians Win at The Supreme Court","authors":"Russell K. Robinson","doi":"10.1086/719566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719566","url":null,"abstract":"In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the SupremeCourt extended a recent trend of invalidating the application of antidiscrimination rules that protected LGBTQ people, stating that such applications violated the First Amendment’s FreeExerciseClause. In 2018, theCourt ruled for an evangelical baker who said that the application of a state antidiscrimination law to his refusal to bake a cake to celebrate the union of a gay couple violated his free exercise right. In these two recent cases, the Court expressed rhetorical support for LGBTQ people’s interest in equal treatment. The holding in each case, however, privileged the asserted free exercise right over the competing equality interest. At","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":"2021 1","pages":"185 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47322378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信