发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Supreme Court Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Front Matter 前页
2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/726135
{"title":"Front Matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1086/726135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726135","url":null,"abstract":"Next article FreeFront MatterPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Supreme Court Review Volume 20222022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/726135 © 2023 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135727382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Should Be National and What Should Be Local in American Judicial Review 美国司法审查中什么是国家审查，什么是地方审查
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724658
Jeffrey S. Sutton
{"title":"What Should Be National and What Should Be Local in American Judicial Review","authors":"Jeffrey S. Sutton","doi":"10.1086/724658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724658","url":null,"abstract":"There is much to say about Dobbs and the various opinions in it. My jurisprudential sympathies, truth be told, run in favor of the decision. But I plan to say little about it. I would prefer to focus on the source of those sympathies rather than on the decision itself. My concern is that we are asking too much of the U.S. Supreme Court. My claim is that we should decentralize more of our debates about American constitutional law. One question dominates every other in American history: What should be national and what should be local?Over the last 100 years or so, we have tended to favor national answers over local ones when it comes to American constitutional law. Often with good reasons: dealing with the imperatives of the Great Depression; bringing Jim Crow to heel; addressing policy challenges that have emerged from an increasingly national and global economy. Even as we recall the reasons not to forget these chapters inAmerican history and even aswe contend with chapters still unfolding, I wonder whether, halfway through our third century, we should pay more attention to the localism side of federalism and be more patient when it comes to the nationalism side","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41502587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Too Much History: Castro-Huerta and the Problem of Change In Indian Law 太多的历史:卡斯特罗-韦尔塔和印度法律的变化问题
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724831
Gregory Ablavsky
{"title":"Too Much History: Castro-Huerta and the Problem of Change In Indian Law","authors":"Gregory Ablavsky","doi":"10.1086/724831","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724831","url":null,"abstract":"Despite bitter criticism and the defiance of Georgia which refused to obey this Court’s mandate in Worcester the broad principles of that decision came to be accepted as law. Over the years this Court has modified these principles in cases where essential tribal relations were not involved and where the rights of Indians would not be jeopardized, but the basic policy of Worcester has remained. (Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217, 219 (1959).)","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44757269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Hidden Judicial Springs of U.S. Foreign Policy 美国外交政策的司法源泉
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724920
Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Aziz Z Huq
{"title":"The Hidden Judicial Springs of U.S. Foreign Policy","authors":"Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Aziz Z Huq","doi":"10.1086/724920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724920","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49619479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rights, Remedies, and Texas’s S.B. 8 权利、救济和德克萨斯州的S.B. 8
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/725213
D. Strauss
{"title":"Rights, Remedies, and Texas’s S.B. 8","authors":"D. Strauss","doi":"10.1086/725213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725213","url":null,"abstract":"It is not every day that a state enacts a law that is designed to prevent people from exercising a constitutional right. The Texas statute known as S.B. 8 is such a law. It prohibited pre-viability abortions at a time when that prohibition was unquestionably inconsistent with the SupremeCourt’s decisions. S.B. 8 then accompanied the prohibition with procedural rules that served no discernible purpose except to make it very difficult for anyone to challenge the law. The question that a law like that raises—or ought to raise—is whether our system of constitutional remedies has the resources to prevent a state from doing what Texas did. InWholeWoman’s Health v. Jackson, the case in which the Supreme Court upheld S.B. 8, the Court did not ask that question. As a result, the Court gave the wrong answers to the questions it did ask. The answers it gave may also suggest that the Court is prepared to limit federal courts’ power to enforce the Constitution in ways that go beyond the specific circumstances of S.B. 8. Those limits, if the Court were to follow through on the suggestions in Whole Woman’s Health, would be inconsistent with established principles that are central both to enforcing constitutional rights and to the supremacy of federal law.","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44956135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Manufacturing Outliers 生产异常值
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/725159
Darrell A. H. Miller, Joseph Blocher
{"title":"Manufacturing Outliers","authors":"Darrell A. H. Miller, Joseph Blocher","doi":"10.1086/725159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725159","url":null,"abstract":"Last term, the Supreme Court issued its first major Second Amendment decision in more than a decade, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. The case concerned a challenge to New York’s century-old “may-issue” regulation, which required applicants to show “proper cause” to receive a license to carry a concealed handgun in public. Petitioners described New York’s may-issue law as an outlier compared to forty-three other states with more relaxed “shall-issue” or permitless carry laws. At oral argument, Paul Clement, representing the petitioners, framed the case as a simple request: “[W]e’d like what they’re having.” In a 6-3 majority opinion striking down New York’s law, Justice Clarence Thomas embraced petitioners’ characterization of the regulation as a contemporary outlier—and went further, casting it as a historical outlier as well. New York and supporting amici had amassed a","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42925067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surveillance, State Secrets, and the Future of Constitutional Rights 监视、国家机密和宪法权利的未来
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724432
L. Donohue
{"title":"Surveillance, State Secrets, and the Future of Constitutional Rights","authors":"L. Donohue","doi":"10.1086/724432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724432","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49256994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. Hepburn 美国奴隶制中被忽视的传闻规则的起源：恢复女王诉赫本案
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724278
D. Sklansky
{"title":"The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. Hepburn","authors":"D. Sklansky","doi":"10.1086/724278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724278","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49088580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opportunistic Originalism: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 机会主义原创主义：多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724759
M. Goodwin
{"title":"Opportunistic Originalism: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization","authors":"M. Goodwin","doi":"10.1086/724759","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724759","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47057524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Anti-Democratic Major Questions Doctrine 反民主的重大问题主义
IF 2 2区 社会学
Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/724919
J. Freeman, M. Stephenson
{"title":"The Anti-Democratic Major Questions Doctrine","authors":"J. Freeman, M. Stephenson","doi":"10.1086/724919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724919","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46006,"journal":{"name":"Supreme Court Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43105123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信