发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

RELIGIOUS STUDIES最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Divine Contradiction: some snippets 神圣的矛盾：一些片段
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000295
Jc Beall
{"title":"Divine Contradiction: some snippets","authors":"Jc Beall","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000295","url":null,"abstract":"Two doctrines (or axioms) of christian theology sharply distinguish christian monotheism from its traditional monotheistic siblings (viz. jewish and islamic monotheism): the incarnation of God and the triunity of God. Both doctrines, as many have long observed, face a conspicuous so-called logical problem – namely, apparent contradiction. How should the strong appearance of such fundamental contradiction be explained? Beall's answer: the incarnation and trinity appear to be contradictory because God is a contradictory being – a being of whom some contradictions are true. The full truth of God is expressed only via contradiction, which is why the fundamental axioms of christian theology have long appeared to be contradictory. <jats:italic>Divine Contradiction</jats:italic> presents the target contradictory account of the trinity; its predecessor <jats:italic>The Contradictory Christ</jats:italic> presents the contradictory account of the incarnation.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142193794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Divine Contradiction: replies to critics 神圣的矛盾：对批评家的答复
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000283
Jc Beall
{"title":"Divine Contradiction: replies to critics","authors":"Jc Beall","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000283","url":null,"abstract":"This is a collection of replies to critics of Divine Contradiction, each critic a symposiast in the <jats:italic>Religious Studies</jats:italic> symposium on said book.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142193798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive 神圣的矛盾：引人入胜却缺乏说服力
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000271
Karen Kilby
{"title":"Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive","authors":"Karen Kilby","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000271","url":null,"abstract":"This article, offered from the point of view of a non-analytic, systematic theologian, admires the freshness, clarity, and simplicity of the proposal at the heart of Beall's <jats:italic>Divine Contradiction</jats:italic>, while raising three objections. The first is to the style in which the book is written: I suggest that it remains far too technical to reach large parts of its intended audience. The second is to the tendency to speak of God as ‘portion’ or ‘fragment’ of reality. The third, more substantive objection is to the proposal that the denial of the divinity of each of the Persons of the Trinity can be part of the Christian faith: I argue that Beall's position that only the failure to affirm a truth, and not its denial, counts as a real heresy, is under-argued and unpersuasive.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142193793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The evidential challenge for petitionary prayer 请愿式祷告的证据挑战
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000209
Noam Oren
{"title":"The evidential challenge for petitionary prayer","authors":"Noam Oren","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000209","url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, philosophers have devoted a great deal of attention to the practice of petitionary prayer. Philosophical inquiries have posed a priori problems – issues that arise from an analytical investigation of the concept of God, the concept of petitionary prayer, and the relationship between the two. Taking a different direction, this article shifts the focus from possibility to actuality. Accordingly, this article does not deal with the question ‘Can God answer petitionary prayers?’ but rather with the question ‘Does God answer petitionary prayers?’ and, mainly, its implications. More accurately, I will present the tension between the religious belief that petitionary prayers can be effective and the fact that this does not seem to be so in reality, a claim that has been the conclusion of several empirical studies. Then I will present and examine several solutions to this tension. Although I will try to promote my preferred solution, my main aim is to clarify the problem and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the solutions offered to solve the problem under discussion.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140936059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding 神谕理论与自我命令的（假定）不一致性
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000210
Jashiel Resto Quiñones
{"title":"Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding","authors":"Jashiel Resto Quiñones","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000210","url":null,"abstract":"Theological voluntarism is a family of metaethical views that share the claim that deontological statuses of actions are dependent on or identical with some divine feature. Adams's version of this theistic metaethical view is a divine command theory (DCT). According to Adams's DCT, the property being-morally-obligated is identical to the property being-commanded-by-God. Thus, a natural consequence of Adams's DCT is that an agent is morally obligated to do something just in case God commands that agent to do such a thing. From Adams's DCT, it follows that God is morally obligated to act just in case God commands himself to act. Quinn argued that commanding oneself is incoherent and, therefore, that God cannot be morally obligated to act. The claim that commanding oneself is incoherent has seldom been discussed in the divine command theory literature. This article is an attempt to change that. Here, I argue (contra Quinn) that that no constitutive rule (or condition of satisfaction) of self-commands is incoherent, from which it follows that self-commanding is not an incoherent speech act. I conclude that divine command theorists can, without the charge of incoherence, affirm that God can be morally obligated because God can command himself.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140935802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Afro-Brazilian religions and religious diversity: contributions to pluralism 非洲裔巴西人的宗教和宗教多样性：对多元化的贡献
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000192
Marciano Adilio Spica
{"title":"Afro-Brazilian religions and religious diversity: contributions to pluralism","authors":"Marciano Adilio Spica","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000192","url":null,"abstract":"<p>My objective is to explore a possible contribution of Afro-Brazilian religions to a pluralist philosophy of religious diversity. I will especially explore the syncretic wisdom of these religious traditions, showing how it can help us better understand interreligious dynamics. To do this, I begin by exposing some challenges of pluralist theses, highlighting two problems: homogenization and isolationism. Following that, I briefly introduce some characteristics of Afro-Brazilian religiosity, emphasizing its syncretic aspects, and then argue in favour of syncretism as a kind of wisdom intrinsic to Afro-Brazilian religiosity. This wisdom encompasses both practical and conceptual aspects. I conclude by demonstrating how this Afro-Brazilian wisdom can contribute with philosophical studies on religious diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140812737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The unreality of traditional Islamic theism's views on belief, providence, and eschatology: a rejoinder to Tabur 传统伊斯兰神学关于信仰、天意和末世论的不现实观点：对塔布尔的反驳
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000180
Imran Aijaz
{"title":"The unreality of traditional Islamic theism's views on belief, providence, and eschatology: a rejoinder to Tabur","authors":"Imran Aijaz","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000180","url":null,"abstract":"In a previous work, I argue that traditional Islamic theism's understanding of the world, when juxtaposed with key facts of our world's religious diversity, is implausible. On this understanding, roughly, the truth of <jats:italic>tawḥīd</jats:italic> (Islamic monotheism) is universally evident, as is belief in its truth. Faithful Muslims act appropriately on knowledge of <jats:italic>tawḥīd</jats:italic> and are rewarded with heaven, whereas non-Muslims culpably refuse to do so and are eternally punished in hell. Such a view of the world, I argue, is not borne out by empirical observation and philosophical reflection. In a recent article, Ayşenur Ünügür Tabur criticizes this argument, presenting a number of objections to it. In this rejoinder, I argue that her objections, which primarily consist of misstatements and irrelevancies, fail to refute my argument. Since traditional Islamic theism's understanding of the world includes the view that some people will be eternally punished in hell, Tabur augments her discussion of my argument by attempting to solve the Problem of Hell. In my rejoinder to Tabur, I further argue that her proffered solution to this problem is woefully inadequate.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140636751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
True ‘contradictions’ and conflicts in the Talmud 塔木德》中真正的 "矛盾 "和冲突
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI: 10.1017/s003441252400012x
Owen Hulatt, Lucas Oro Hershtein
{"title":"True ‘contradictions’ and conflicts in the Talmud","authors":"Owen Hulatt, Lucas Oro Hershtein","doi":"10.1017/s003441252400012x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003441252400012x","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we consider the presence of what appear to be true contradictions in the Talmud. We consider and reject a glut-theoretic response. We argue these apparently contradictory Talmudic passages should be understood not as ordinary propositions, but as being given under an operator. This allows us to understand these rulings as genuinely conflicting, but not genuinely contradictory. We illustrate the broad shape of such a view through consideration of Hans Kelsen's late-period philosophy of law. We also consider and reject responses to this issue given by Rashi, R. Kook, and R. Feinstein. We close by considering why a system of Jewish law which allows for jointly affirmed conflicting propositions is desirable. We claim that if, as Maimonides suggests, the fundamental project of Jewish law is the eradication of idolatry, then the law itself should remind us that God's ways are higher than our ways. One way of doing so is to resist capture by a transparent set of principles, by allowing for conflicting rulings to be affirmed. This article does not presuppose familiarity with the Talmudic corpus or Jewish tradition.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"58 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140576087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The apple of God's eye: a biblical account of holiness 上帝眼中的苹果：圣经中关于圣洁的描述
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412524000131
Samuel Lebens
{"title":"The apple of God's eye: a biblical account of holiness","authors":"Samuel Lebens","doi":"10.1017/s0034412524000131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412524000131","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, an exercise in Jewish philosophy, I propose a taxonomy that can account for and organize all of the many species of holiness that we find in the Hebrew Bible. Each species admits of precise definition. Moreover, the genus as a whole can be unified by a guiding metaphor, suggested by the Bible itself. Holiness, according to this metaphor, is bestowed by a certain type of gaze, and ultimately by occupying the centre of the field of God's attention.","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140576092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trinity, simplicity, and contradictory theology: a theologian's reflections 三位一体、简单性和矛盾的神学：一位神学家的思考
IF 0.6 2区 哲学
RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1017/s003441252400009x
Thomas H. McCall
{"title":"Trinity, simplicity, and contradictory theology: a theologian's reflections","authors":"Thomas H. McCall","doi":"10.1017/s003441252400009x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003441252400009x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>I explore the promise of Beall's proposal for a long-standing challenge for traditional theology. I first offer a sketch of the problem and a brief overview of some of the more common responses to it. I then show how Beall's proposal holds initial promise; following this I highlight some concerns and raise some questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45888,"journal":{"name":"RELIGIOUS STUDIES","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140302842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信