GMS Journal for Medical Education最新文献

{"title":"Measuring personal characteristics in applicants to German medical schools: Piloting an online Situational Judgement Test with an open-ended response format.","authors":"Mirjana Knorr, Ina Mielke, Dorothee Amelung, Mahla Safari, Oana R Gröne, Simon M Breil, Alexander MacIntosh","doi":"10.3205/zma001685","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001685","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Situational Judgement Tests (SJT) are a cost-efficient method for the assessment of personal characteristics (e.g., empathy, professionalism, ethical thinking) in medical school admission. Recently, complex open-ended response format SJTs have become more feasible to conduct. However, research on their applicability to a German context is missing. This pilot study tests the acceptability, reliability, subgroup differences, and validity of an online SJT with open-ended response format developed in Canada (\"Casper\").</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>German medical school applicants and students from Hamburg were invited to take Casper in 2020 and 2021. The test consisted of 12 video- and text-based scenarios, each followed by three open-ended questions. Participants subsequently evaluated their test experience in an online survey. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, other admission criteria (Abitur, TMS, HAM-Nat, HAM-SJT) and study success (OSCE) was available in a central research database (stav).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full sample consisted of 582 participants. Test-takers' global perception of Casper was positive. Internal consistency was satisfactory in both years (<i>α</i>=0.73; 0.82) while interrater agreement was moderate (ICC(1,2)=0.54). Participants who were female (<i>d</i>=0.37) or did not have a migration background (<i>d</i>=0.40) received higher scores. Casper scores correlated with HAM-SJT (<i>r</i>=.18) but not with OSCE communication stations performance. The test was also related to Abitur grades (<i>r</i>=-.15), the TMS (<i>r</i>=.18), and HAM-Nat logical reasoning scores (<i>r</i>=.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides positive evidence for the acceptability, internal consistency, and convergent validity of Casper. The selection and training of raters as well as the scenario content require further observation and adjustments to a German context to improve interrater reliability and predictive validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310783/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Beliefs for successful feedback communication.","authors":"Michaela Wagner-Menghin","doi":"10.3205/zma001689","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001689","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Medical studies at the University of Freiburg in retrospect - study conditions, study quality and skills acquisition from the perspective of graduates.","authors":"Kevin Kunz, Hannah Köpper","doi":"10.3205/zma001684","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the MER<i>LIN</i> project (Medical Education Research - Lehrforschung im Netz BW), funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, graduate surveys were carried out at the Medical Faculty of Freiburg from 2012-2020. This article will primarily address the question of how the study conditions and competence orientation in Freiburg are assessed and where there is still a need for optimization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The surveys were conducted among graduates of human medicine at the Freiburg Medical Faculty 1.5 years after graduation. Participation was possible using paper and online questionnaires. The response rates were 36%-43%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study conditions were largely rated as good. There is a need for optimization, especially in the area of scientific work. The level of skills acquired was assessed as good to moderate. There were discrepancies between the level of competence achieved during the course of study and the level of competence required to start a career.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need for development in terms of preparation for starting a career. Compared to the professionally required level of competence, self-assessment was worse in most competence domains. In Freiburg there are approaches to further promote the acquisition of skills during studies. In order to evaluate these developments and future changes in the context of studies, graduate surveys are relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Graduate surveys are suitable for generating data on the basis of which curriculum design can be carried out or which can be used to prepare for change processes. The surveys in Freiburg will therefore be continued and supplemented with new, needs-based questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Palliative care education and knowledge transfer into practice - a multicenter survey among medical students and resident physicians in Germany using a mixed-methods design.","authors":"Marie-Christin Dronia, Kim Dillen, Frank Elsner, Manuela Schallenburger, Martin Neukirchen, Anna Hagemeier, Stefanie Hamacher, Axel Doll, Raymond Voltz, Heidrun Golla","doi":"10.3205/zma001682","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2009, Palliative care was incorporated into the medical curriculum as Cross-Sectional Subject 13 (QB13) by means of the revision of the Medical Licensing Regulations for Physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the strengths and deficits of QB13 student education for palliative care in clinical practice in a multi-centre setting and to identify potential for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online questionnaires filled out by medical students during their Practical Year (PY) and resident physicians from the university hospitals in Aachen, Düsseldorf, and Cologne were descriptively analyzed using SPSS; free-text responses were categorized and quantified. Semi-structured interviews with the resident physicians (using a mixed-methods design) were analyzed through content analysis. Emerging categories were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 130 fully completed questionnaires and 23 interviews revealed that participants particularly benefited from patient- and practice-oriented small-group sessions for their clinical work. Despite some university-specific differences, the PY students identified a need for training in end-of-life-care, while resident physicians saw a need for training primarily in dealing with patients and their relatives. They also reported deficits in transferability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QB13 should be organised in cross-university curricula and provide sufficient resources for practical-oriented small-group teaching. Based on the \"unit of care\", besides caring for palliative patients, dealing with patients' families should also be an education focus. To improve transferability into clinical practice, students should be actively involved in the care of palliative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 3","pages":"Doc27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310786/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Encouraging medical students to become surgeons? Impact of psychological and surgical factors on career choice at medical school.","authors":"Sandra Brügge, Veronika Günther, Ingolf Cascorbi, Nicolai Maass, Zino Ruchay, Martin R Fischer, Johanna Huber, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.3205/zma001676","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001676","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Training decisions are viewed as a problem by the majority of medical students.In the present study we compared sociodemographic and psychological characteristics of students who are interested in surgical training to those who preferred a non-surgical specialty. Furthermore, we examined whether students who wish to be trained as surgeons performed better than their non-surgical counterparts in a course designed to acquire skills in minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From October 2020 to January 2021 we performed a cross-sectional survey among 116 medical students prior to their year of practical training at Christian-Albrechts University in Kiel. Based on their intended field of specialization, the students were divided into a non-surgical and a surgical group. Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics such as self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception were evaluated and compared between groups. Simultaneously, we compared their surgical performance in two laparoscopic exercises and their self-assessment as surgeons. Statistical differences between the training groups were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test or Pearson's Chi square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two students participated in the study, of whom 64.1% intended to train in a non-surgical specialty and 35.9% in a surgical specialty. Students who wished to be trained as surgeons had higher general self-efficacy expectations (p<0.001) and greater resilience (p=0.009). However, on comparison they had a lower stress level (p=0.047). The inter-group comparison of training results and self-assessment as surgeons revealed no unequivocal differences in surgical performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interest in surgical specialties is correlated, among other factors, with the strength of psychological skills such as general self-efficacy expectations, resilience and stress perception. Early attention to these psychological resources in academic training might assist medical students in future career choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The level and determinants of empathy among medical students from Arabic speaking countries: A systematic review.","authors":"Soumaya Benmaarmar, Hind Bourkhime, Ibtissam El Harch, Karima El Rhazi","doi":"10.3205/zma001670","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aims to investigate the level of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries and analyze its determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2022 (PRISMA), the authors conducted a systematic research of studies investigating the level and determinants of empathy among medical students in Arabic speaking countries. The databases PubMed, Scopus, web of science and google scholar were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies from six countries were included. Nine of which had a cross-sectional study design. Level of empathy was assessed using the Jefferson scale in seven studies and using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in two studies. The mean of empathy scale ranges between 97.65±14.10 to 106.55±19.16 in studies used the Jefferson scale of empathy. The associated factors with empathy were gender; high levels of empathy were reported in female students. Other factors are explored in relation with empathy such as specialty preference (surgery or medicine, \"people-orientated\" specialties or ''technology-oriented specialties''), family factors (marital status of parents, satisfactory relationship with parents, parents level of education and household income) and factors related to medical education (academic performance, year of study and type of curriculum) but the results are heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic review, which illustrated the determinants of empathy in Arabic medical students. Our results revealed varied results on empathy determinants. Further studies may guarantee a full exploration of this ability in order to improve the doctor-patient relationship and patient management in the Arab world.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106575/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development and evaluation of three-dimensional transfers to depict skin conditions in simulation-based education.","authors":"Kai Philipp Schnabel, Andrea Carolin Lörwald, Helmut Beltraminelli, Miria Germano, Beate Gabriele Brem, Sandra Wüst, Daniel Bauer","doi":"10.3205/zma001669","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern medical moulages are becoming increasingly important in simulation-based health professions education. Their lifelikeness is important so that simulation engagement is not disrupted while their standardization is crucial in high-stakes exams. This report describes in detail how three-dimensional transfers are developed and produced so that educators will be able to develop their own. In addition, evaluation findings and lessons learnt from deploying transfers in summative assessments are shared. Step-by-step instructions are given for the creation and application of transfers, including materials and photographic visualizations. We also examined feedback on 10 exam stations (out of a total of 81) with self-developed three-dimensional transfers and complement this with additional lessons learnt. By the time of submission, the authors successfully developed and deployed over 40 different three-dimensional transfers representing different clinical findings in high-stakes exams using the techniques explained in this article or variations thereof. Feedback from students and examiners after completing the OSCE is predominantly positive, with lifelikeness being the quality most often commented upon. Caveats derived from feedback and own experiences are included. The step-by-step approach reported can be adapted and replicated by healthcare educators to build their own three-dimensional transfers. This should widen the scope and the lifelikeness of their simulations. At the same time we propose that this level of lifelikeness should be expected by learners as not to disrupt simulation engagement. Our evaluation of their use in high-stakes assessments suggests they are both useful and accepted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Crafting medical MCQs with generative AI: A how-to guide on leveraging ChatGPT.","authors":"Matthias Stadler, Anna Horrer, Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma001675","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As medical educators grapple with the consistent demand for high-quality assessments, the integration of artificial intelligence presents a novel solution. This how-to article delves into the mechanics of employing ChatGPT for generating Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) within the medical curriculum. Focusing on the intricacies of prompt engineering, we elucidate the steps and considerations imperative for achieving targeted, high-fidelity results. The article presents varying outcomes based on different prompt structures, highlighting the AI's adaptability in producing questions of distinct complexities. While emphasizing the transformative potential of ChatGPT, we also spotlight challenges, including the AI's occasional \"hallucination\", underscoring the importance of rigorous review. This guide aims to furnish educators with the know-how to integrate AI into their assessment creation process, heralding a new era in medical education tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106576/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Position paper on postgraduate medical education on the occasion of hospital reform - postgraduate medical education must be considered. A joint position paper by Bündnis Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte and AG Junge Gastroenterologie of the DGVS as well as the Young DGN.","authors":"Eckhart G Hahn","doi":"10.3205/zma001677","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Bündnis Junger Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ, Alliance of Young Physicians in Germany) has presented a position paper (PP) on Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) against the background of an unfolding hospital reform in Germany, and they describe existing deficits of PGME in Germany. Based on this, demands were made of legislators, employers and medical associations which could result in a sweeping reformation of PGME. Hospital reforms can only be accomplished with well trained and motivated physicians. In this respect the BJÄ regards the reform of hospitals and the health-care system as a chance for a reform of PGME, which is long overdue. Legislative competence for PGME lies with the States of the Federal Republic of Germany and this warrants an adjustment of state medical association laws to accommodate the demands of the BJÄ. Generally PGME must be taken into consideration in all health-care legislation, in analogy to the meanwhile globally adopted principle of \"Health in all Politics (HiAP)\". The BJÄ has made every endeavour to produce this PP. The responsible stakeholders and actors in the health-care system would be well-advised to take the position paper seriously with a dwindling physician work force in hospitals and serious quality deficits in PGME. Hence, the BJÄ must be comprehensively supported. They need congenial partners to define the scientific foundation of all their demands, to test their application under real life conditions in hospital and outpatient care, to pursue research on the impact on patient care and on the intended transformation of the health-care system. This might best be accomplished by partnering with a scientific <i>Association for Postgraduate Medical Education</i> as has been the case in many countries for decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Position statement of the GMA committee \"teaching evaluation\".","authors":"Nicolas Haverkamp, Janina Barth, Dennis Schmidt, Uta Dahmen, Oliver Keis, Tobias Raupach","doi":"10.3205/zma001674","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma001674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evaluation of teaching can be an essential driver for curriculum development. Instruments for teaching evaluation are not only used for the purpose of quality assurance but also in the context of medical education research. Therefore, they must meet the common requirements for reliability and validity. This position paper from the GMA Teaching Evaluation Committee discusses strategic and methodological aspects of evaluation in the context of undergraduate medical education and related courses; and formulates recommendations for the further development of evaluation. First, a four-step approach to the design and implementation of evaluations is presented, then methodological and practical aspects are discussed in more detail. The focus here is on target and confounding variables, survey instruments as well as aspects of implementation and data protection. Finally, possible consequences from evaluation data for the four dimensions of teaching quality (structural and procedural aspects, teachers and outcomes) are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 2","pages":"Doc19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}