Stress experience and coping strategies in medical studies - insights and a discussion of preventive measures.

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001730
Iris Warnken, Sabine Polujanski, Thomas Rotthoff, Ann-Kathrin Schindler
{"title":"Stress experience and coping strategies in medical studies - insights and a discussion of preventive measures.","authors":"Iris Warnken, Sabine Polujanski, Thomas Rotthoff, Ann-Kathrin Schindler","doi":"10.3205/zma001730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A high level of stress and critical burnout values (27-56%) has been identified among medical students in numerous international research and review studies. The aim of this interview study was to gain insights into students' perspectives on stressors, stress amplifiers and reactions, as well as the coping strategies they applied. The results will be used to discuss preventative measures in higher education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 22 semi-standardised, semi-narrative interviews were conducted with medical students, students in their practical year and junior doctors to gain retrospective perspectives on their studies. All data were audio-recorded, pseudonymised, fully transcribed as well as structured and analysed using qualitative content analysis, based on Kaluza's stress model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study-related causes (e.g. the amount of material), private issues (e.g. social conflicts) and aspects arising during clinical work phases (e.g. complexity of tasks) were named as stressors. Individual stress amplifiers, such as perfectionism, were also described. The respondents showed stress reactions, such as doubts and fears. The coping strategies described were varied, but some were seen to be effective only in the short term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to cope with stress must be consciously learned and reflected upon across various causative areas. In particular, the discussion of mental strategies for dealing with repeatedly described stress amplifiers, such as one's own perfectionism, appears to be a behavioural prevention measure that is still little used by medical students. In terms of behavioural prevention, discourses on large amounts of learning material, increased support in the transition phase at the start of a degree course and more flexible studying for medical students (e.g. with a family) must be further developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"42 1","pages":"Doc6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A high level of stress and critical burnout values (27-56%) has been identified among medical students in numerous international research and review studies. The aim of this interview study was to gain insights into students' perspectives on stressors, stress amplifiers and reactions, as well as the coping strategies they applied. The results will be used to discuss preventative measures in higher education.

Methods: A total of 22 semi-standardised, semi-narrative interviews were conducted with medical students, students in their practical year and junior doctors to gain retrospective perspectives on their studies. All data were audio-recorded, pseudonymised, fully transcribed as well as structured and analysed using qualitative content analysis, based on Kaluza's stress model.

Results: Study-related causes (e.g. the amount of material), private issues (e.g. social conflicts) and aspects arising during clinical work phases (e.g. complexity of tasks) were named as stressors. Individual stress amplifiers, such as perfectionism, were also described. The respondents showed stress reactions, such as doubts and fears. The coping strategies described were varied, but some were seen to be effective only in the short term.

Conclusion: The ability to cope with stress must be consciously learned and reflected upon across various causative areas. In particular, the discussion of mental strategies for dealing with repeatedly described stress amplifiers, such as one's own perfectionism, appears to be a behavioural prevention measure that is still little used by medical students. In terms of behavioural prevention, discourses on large amounts of learning material, increased support in the transition phase at the start of a degree course and more flexible studying for medical students (e.g. with a family) must be further developed.

医学研究中的压力经验和应对策略——对预防措施的见解和讨论。
目的:在众多国际研究和回顾研究中,医学生中存在高水平的压力和临界倦怠值(27-56%)。本访谈研究的目的是了解学生对压力源、压力放大器和反应的看法,以及他们采用的应对策略。研究结果将用于讨论高等教育中的预防措施。方法:采用半标准化、半叙述性访谈法,对医学生、实习年级学生和初级医生共22例进行回顾性调查。所有数据均录音、假名、完全转录,并基于Kaluza应力模型进行定性内容分析和结构化分析。结果:与研究相关的原因(如材料的数量)、私人问题(如社会冲突)和临床工作阶段产生的方面(如任务的复杂性)被称为压力源。个人的压力放大器,如完美主义,也被描述。受访者表现出压力反应,如怀疑和恐惧。所描述的应对策略多种多样,但有些被认为只在短期内有效。结论:应对压力的能力必须有意识地学习,并反映在各个致病领域。特别是,关于处理反复描述的压力放大器的心理策略的讨论,比如一个人自己的完美主义,似乎是一种行为预防措施,但医学生仍然很少使用。在行为预防方面,必须进一步发展关于大量学习材料的论述,在学位课程开始时增加过渡阶段的支持,以及为医科学生(例如有家庭的学生)提供更灵活的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信