EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES最新文献_第7页

Reading Swift's Poetry by Daniel Cook, and: Alexander Pope in the Making by Joseph Hone (review) 阅读丹尼尔·库克的《斯威夫特的诗歌》和约瑟夫·霍恩的《正在成长的亚历山大·波普》(书评)

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900662

Claude Willan

引用次数: 0

The Perils of Interpreting: The Extraordinary Lives of Two Translators between Qing China and the British Empire by Henrietta Harrison (review) 解读的危险：两位翻译家在清与英帝国之间的非凡生活Henrietta Harrison（综述）

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900664

E. Min

引用次数: 0

Staging Civilization: A Transnational History of French Theater in Eighteenth-Century Europe by Rahul Markovits (review) 《舞台文明:18世纪欧洲法国戏剧的跨国历史》作者:拉胡尔·马科维茨

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900668

Keenan Burton

引用次数: 0

The Castle of Otranto and the Whig Fantasy of History 奥特朗托城堡与辉格党的历史幻想

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900659

Kay Chronister

引用次数: 0

Wives Not Slaves: Patriarchy and Modernity in the Age of Revolutions by Kirsten Sword (review) 《妻子不是奴隶:革命时代的父权制与现代性》克尔斯滕·索夫著(书评)

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900676

Antonio T. Bly

引用次数: 0

Carrying All Before Her: Celebrity Pregnancy and the London Stage, 1689–1800 by Chelsea Phillips (review) Chelsea Phillips的《在她之前承载一切：名人怀孕与伦敦舞台》，1689-1800（评论）

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900674

Nora Nachumi

引用次数: 1

Samuel Richardson and Edward Young's Authorship Network 塞缪尔·理查森与爱德华·杨的作家网络

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.a900661

H. Havens

引用次数: 0

The Printed Reader: Gender, Quixotism, and Textual Bodies in Eighteenth-Century Britain by Amelia Dale (review) 《印刷版读者：18世纪英国的性别、吉诃德主义和文本身体》，艾米莉亚·戴尔（评论）

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.0036

April Alliston

引用次数: 0

Art, Science, and the Body in Early Romanticism by Stephanie O'Rourke (review) Stephanie O'Rourke的《早期浪漫主义中的艺术、科学与身体》（综述）

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.0045

R. Marks

{"title":"Art, Science, and the Body in Early Romanticism by Stephanie O'Rourke (review)","authors":"R. Marks","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.0045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0045","url":null,"abstract":"The political threat represented by the quixotic reader figure by the end of the eighteenth century, according to Dale, involves “enthusiastic, materialist misreading” (this is indeed where it seems that more attention to Austen might have complicated the conclusion [120]). Dale herself is a materialist reader, and in that sense a quixotic one, as she seems implicitly to acknowledge in her conclusion, albeit in a new sense. That new sense Dale has created in this book is a novel kind of quixotic reading that is learned and rational rather than enthusiastic, and which produces incisive and helpful readings rather than dangerous misreadings. In summing up the narrative arc the book has traced, she writes: “We can find no straight, progressive A-to-B line from literal to metaphorical impressions, from Allestree’s reader to Austen’s. We have been thrown instead, down some nonlinear route, dragged up and tugged along by philosophical, religious, and geopolitical tectonics . . . that is how we now do quixotic reading” (153). To paraphrase, we do quixotic reading precisely by standing in the slop, or rather being dragged through it, willy-nilly, by scholars like Dale.","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":"56 1","pages":"505 - 508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46264995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Collective Understanding, Radicalism, and Literary History, 1645–1742 by Melissa Mowry (review) 集体理解、激进主义和文学史，1645-1742，Melissa Mowry（评论）

IF 0.4 3区社会学

EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2023.0041

Peter Degabriele

{"title":"Collective Understanding, Radicalism, and Literary History, 1645–1742 by Melissa Mowry (review)","authors":"Peter Degabriele","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0041","url":null,"abstract":"Melissa Mowry’s Collective Understanding, Radicalism, and Literary History follows the traces of a non-elite communal practice of hermeneutics and a collectivist politics in seventeenthand eighteenth-century English literary history. The book has five chapters, the first of which functions as an introduction, as well as a short but provocative coda. Throughout, Mowry looks to the Levellers as the positive articulation of a collective hermeneutics that she claims has been buried by the standard narrative of the rise of liberal individualism, and she argues that the political and literary history of the period she examines should be reconceived as a consistent attempt to eradicate this collectivism in favor of a conservative individualism. This is in stark contrast to the conventional narrative of early eighteenthcentury political and literary history which argues that an individualist ideology produced a new liberal and anti-absolutist politics. For Mowry, by contrast, the theater of the Restoration and early novels by Defoe worked tirelessly to disavow the possibility of collectivist thought and politics. This refraction of the traditional narrative throws up some surprising and enlightening results. The Tory Aphra Behn and the dissenting Whig Daniel Defoe, for instance, are, in Mowry’s account, engaged in the same political project of anti-collectivism rather than existing on opposite sides of a partisan political spectrum. This new lens thus reorients our vision of this period and stands as a profound challenge to conventional ways of understanding the relation of Restoration and early eighteenth-century literature to political ideology.","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":"56 1","pages":"484 - 486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49662457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0